在过去的二十多年里,我一直在芝加哥各地的急诊室工作,我亲眼目睹了一家医院从它赖以生存的社区消失时所发生的一切。
For more than two decades, I have worked in emergency departments across Chicago, and I have watched what happens when a hospital disappears from a neighborhood that depended upon it.
救护车不得不行驶更远的距离,候诊室填满的速度更快,患者到达时病情也更重,因为他们在需要时没有得到所需的护理。在我职业生涯的过程中,我没有料到会看到这种情况发生——不是因为社区无法维持这家医院的运营,而是因为医院被拆分变卖的资产价值可能高于其正常运营的价值。
The ambulances have to drive farther, waiting rooms fill faster, and patients arrive sicker because the care they needed wasn’t there when they needed it. What I didn’t expect over the course of my career was to watch this happen not because a neighborhood couldn’t support the hospital, but because the hospital’s assets may be worth more extracted than operating.
2026年3月,位于伊利诺伊州奥克帕克的西郊医疗中心(West Suburban Medical Center)突然关闭,成为芝加哥医疗安全网中第三家倒闭的医院。韦斯纪念医院(Weiss Memorial Hospital)也在2025年意外关闭,梅尔罗斯帕克的韦斯特莱克医院(Westlake Hospital)则在2019年关闭。它们的共同点是,这三家医院曾在某个时期由派普线医疗(Pipeline Health)所有——这是一家私募股权支持的医院连锁集团,于2019年收购了它们。
In March 2026, West Suburban Medical Center, located in Oak Park, Ill., became the third hospital in Chicago’s safety net to abruptly close. Weiss Memorial Hospital also closed unexpectedly in 2025, and Westlake Hospital in Melrose Park in 2019. The common denominator is that all three were, at one point, owned by Pipeline Health, a private-equity-backed hospital chain that acquired them in 2019.
这不仅仅是芝加哥的故事,它正在全美各地上演。目前大约有447家医院由私募股权所有,其中约25%服务于农村人口。虽然私募股权支持的公司创造了美国约7%的国内生产总值,但它们占了2024年所有医疗保健破产案的21%,以及当年八大最大医疗保健破产案中的七起。
This is not just a Chicago story — it is happening all across the country. Approximately 447 hospitals are now under private-equity ownership, and about 25 percent serve rural populations. While private-equity-backed companies generate roughly 7 percent of U.S. GDP, they accounted for 21 percent of all health care bankruptcies in 2024, and seven of the eight largest health care bankruptcies that year.
最引人注目的是,曾是全国最大的私营营利性医院系统的斯图尔德医疗集团(Steward Health Care),于2010年被一家私募股权公司收购,并于2020年出售。四年后,该医院系统关闭了其医疗安全网医院并申请破产,导致弱势患者群体无法获得医疗服务,并且距离可能需要争分夺秒的急诊护理长达数英里,同时伴随着延长的紧急医疗运输时间。
Most notably, Steward Health Care, once the largest private for-profit hospital system in the country, was purchased by a private-equity firm in 2010 and sold in 2020. Four years later, the hospital system closed both their safety net hospitals and filed for bankruptcy, leaving a vulnerable patient population without access to health care and many miles away from potentially time-sensitive emergency care with prolonged emergency medical transport times.
安全网医院服务的患者群体中,低收入人群、公共保险覆盖人群以及种族和民族多元化人群的比例显著偏高。根据“美国基本医院”(America’s Essential Hospitals)的数据,75%的患者要么没有保险,要么由医疗补助计划(Medicaid)或联邦医疗保险(Medicare)覆盖。这些医院通常是农村和城市社区唯一的高危医疗服务来源。作为急性医疗服务的入口,这些医院的急诊科就诊量平均是其他医院的两倍。
Safety-net hospitals serve a patient population that is disproportionately low-income, publicly insured and racially and ethnically diverse. According to America’s Essential Hospitals, 75 percent of the patients are either uninsured or covered by Medicaid or Medicare. These hospitals are frequently the sole local source of high-acuity services for rural and urban communities. As the front door to acute care, these hospitals see twice as many emergency department visits on average.
由于服务大量低收入患者,大多数安全网医院依赖有针对性的公共资金来弥补未获补偿和补偿不足的医疗服务成本。与单纯追求支付方结构优化不同,这些医院致力于履行服务弱势群体的使命,这导致其财务状况十分脆弱。因此,这种利润微薄且依赖公共支付方的结构,使得安全网医院和农村医院成为杠杆收购、售后回租以及不幸的关闭对象。
Serving high volumes of low-income patients, most safety-net hospitals rely on targeted public financing to offset uncompensated and under-reimbursed care. The commitment to the mission of providing care for vulnerable populations, as opposed to targeting payer mix, contributes to their financially fragile existence. As a result, the thin-margin, public payer-dependent structure makes safety-net and rural hospitals targets for leveraged buyouts, sale-leasebacks and, unfortunately, closures.
私募股权对医疗体系的资本化运作带来了巨大代价。虽然私募股权对医院的控股可能为其投资者带来数百万美元的收益,但却将患者、社区和医疗服务提供者置于风险之中。
The corporatization of the health care system by private equity has come with significant costs. While private equity’s ownership of hospitals may earn millions for their investors, they have put patients, communities and providers at risk.
美国参议院预算委员会的一项两党联合调查审查了超过一百万份内部文件,得出结论称,私募股权公司“从医院中攫取了巨额利润,同时增加了医院的债务,并导致患者护理质量和安全水平下降”,在某些情况下,这直接迫使医院关闭。
A bipartisan U.S. Senate Budget Committee investigation, which reviewed more than a million internal documents, concluded that private-equity firms “extracted huge profits from hospitals, while increasing their debt and allowing patient care and safety to decline,” and that in some cases this directly forced closures.
2023年发表在《美国医学会杂志》(Journal of the American Medical Association)上的一项研究发现,在私募股权收购医院后,可预防的不良事件增加了25%,其中包括中心静脉导管血流感染增加38%,以及手术部位感染率翻倍。
A 2023 study in the Journal of the America Medical Association found a 25 percent increase in preventable adverse events at hospitals after private-equity acquisition, including a 38 percent rise in central-line bloodstream infections and a doubling of surgical-site infections.
近期发表在《内科年鉴》(Annals of Internal Medicine)上的一项研究则指出,私募股权控股与人员裁减有关,并导致急诊室死亡率相应上升了13%。
A more recent study in the Annals of Internal Medicine linked private-equity ownership to cuts in staffing and a corresponding 13 percent increase in emergency room deaths.
2024年7的一项研究发现,在被私募股权收购后的两年内,医院资产平均下降了24%,相当于每家医院有大约2800万美元的建筑、设备和基础设施凭空消失。
And a July 2024 study found that hospital assets fell by 24 percent, on average, in the two years after a private-equity purchase, approximately $28 million per hospital in buildings, equipment and infrastructure that simply disappeared.
这一切并非不可避免。这是一种特定融资模式的可预测结果,而政策制定者们正开始以这种眼光看待它。包括伊利诺伊州在内的25个州的立法者已经提出了至少79项法案,并颁布了几项针对医疗机构私募股权所有权的法律。
None of this is inevitable. It is the predictable result of a specific financing model, and policymakers are beginning to treat it that way. Lawmakers in 25 states, including Illinois, have introduced at least 79 bills, and enacted several addressing private-equity ownership of medical facilities.
而且,这一切发生之时,一个更大的威胁正在逼近。预计于2025年通过的联邦医疗补助(Medicaid)重组将在未来十年内将联邦医疗补助支出减少约1万亿美元,其中新条款定于2027年1月开始对伊利诺伊州产生影响。
And this is happening as a much larger threat looms. Federal Medicaid restructuring passed in 2025 is projected to reduce federal Medicaid spending by roughly $1 trillion over the next decade, with new provisions set to hit Illinois starting in January 2027.
按定义服务于最高比例医疗补助患者的兜底医院(Safety-net hospitals),将承担这一削减带来的最大冲击。我们不得不问,一旦其主要资金来源进一步缩减,这些幸存的兜底医院将会面临怎样的命运。
Safety-net hospitals, which by definition serve the highest share of Medicaid patients, will absorb the brunt of that reduction. It is worth asking what happens to the remaining safety-net hospitals once their primary funding source shrinks even further.
兜底医院绝不是等待倒手转卖的不良资产。相反,它们往往决定了中风是否能被及时发现、枪伤是否能在几分钟内得到稳定处理,以及一个社区是能够自给自足地获得医疗照顾,还是必须驱车很远才能就医。
Safety-net hospitals are not distressed assets waiting to be flipped. Instead, they often may be the difference between a stroke caught in time and one that isn’t, between a gunshot wound stabilized in minutes and one that isn’t, between a neighborhood that can care for its own and one that has to drive a considerable distance to do so.
私募股权集团承诺提高效率和扭亏为盈,但作为一名致力于所有人健康与福祉的医生、医疗倡导者和关注此事的公民,核心问题依然是:“究竟对谁而言是高效的?”
Private-equity groups promise efficiency and turnaround, but as a physician, health care advocate and concerned citizen committed to health and well-being for all, the million-dollar question remains “Efficient for whom?” Heather Prendergast, MD, is a professor of emergency medicine, attending physician, and vice dean of clinical affairs at the University of Illinois College of Medicine, and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpED Project at the University of Illinois.
希瑟·普伦德加斯特(Heather Prendergast)医学博士是伊利诺伊大学医学院急诊医学教授、主治医师兼临床事务副院长,也是伊利诺伊大学“观点专栏项目”(OpED Project)的公共之声研究员(Public Voices Fellow)。
Private-equity groups promise efficiency and turnaround, but as a physician, health care advocate and concerned citizen committed to health and well-being for all, the million-dollar question remains “Efficient for whom?” Heather Prendergast, MD, is a professor of emergency medicine, attending physician, and vice dean of clinical affairs at the University of Illinois College of Medicine, and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpED Project at the University of Illinois.