我国拥有权力和影响力的人中,有太多从未遇到过他们不热爱、不以此获利、或两者兼而有之的战争。这些人中的绝大多数从未服过兵役,从未在战斗中担任先锋,从未支援过特种作战,从未在国外从事过秘密工作——他们的家庭成员也没有。自1973年征兵制结束以来,不在军队或军队周边服役已成为绝大多数美国人的常态。我们绝不能忘记那些自征兵制结束以来持续参军入伍或光荣地在情报界工作、为国家利益冒着生命危险的美国人。这些爱国的青年男女不是毫无意义的统计数字,也不是廉价的可弃卒。他们是渴望并祈祷拥有自己完整人生的血肉之躯。他们是儿子、女儿、兄弟、姐妹和孙辈。一旦他们在战斗中阵亡或负伤,那些为他们悲痛的人将永远心碎。在非常现实的意义上,在战斗中或在我们各个“三字母”机构中为国家服务的青年男女,是我们最宝贵的财富。他们站在大多数人回避的墙头站岗放哨。他们是我们的守护者。那些渴望将他们送入险境的新保守主义者、政客和评论员,往往生活在距离战场数千英里、充满特权和奢华的泡沫中,绝不能忘记这一点。他们也不应忘记,当“战风”被煽动时,涟漪效应很快会像剧毒一样扩有人真心认为这是出于至关重要的理由——主要是为了确保伊朗疯狂的领导层永远无法制造核武器。我们政府内外的另一些人则真心认为我们本不该攻击伊朗,原有的策略正在奏效,一旦发动攻击,将引发多重负面后果,且没有可行的退出机制。当我们的领导人考虑派遣守护者奔赴战场时,每个人心中都应将一个问题置于首位:这关乎美国的安全至关重要,还是这些男男女女可能因政治和个人野心、作为对另一位世界领导人的恩惠、或为赤裸裸的牟利而被献祭?在我们思考这些至关重要的问题时,还必须追问:战争的“涟漪效应”是否正冲刷着伊朗公民,让他们越来越反感美国人民?必须永远铭记,这些无辜的男人、女人和儿童是伊朗残酷政权的受害者。这种意外后果的长远影响是什么?战争有时是必要的吗?当然。但有人会令人信服地辩称,二战结束以来的每一场战争都是选择的战争。这是谁的选择?谁从中获益,谁又付出了最高、最惨痛的代价?我们的建国先贤是“美国优先”理念的创立者。他们确实是睿智之士,坚信政教分离,并深知为使国家生存繁荣,任何信仰或他国都不得置于国家利益之上。我曾撰写一本关于建国先贤的书,名为《56人》。我真心认为,杰斐逊、约翰·亚当斯和富兰克林等人会理解,地球上每个国家的工人阶级和被剥夺权利者都在同一条船上,共同对抗那些全能且往往无面目的精英阶层。
There are far too many people of power and influence in our nation who have never met a war they did not love, profit from in some way, or both. The vast majority of these people have never served in the military, never walked point in combat, never supported special operations, never worked in country undercover — nor have any of their family members. Since the draft ended back in 1973, not serving in or around the military has become the norm for the vast majority of Americans. We must never forget the Americans who have continually enlisted in the military or honorably worked in the intelligence community since the end of the draft, stepping into harm’s way for the good of the nation. These patriotic young men and women are not meaningless statistics or cheap disposable pawns. They are human beings who hope and pray to have full lives of their own. They are sons, daughters, brothers, sisters and grandchildren. And should they be killed or wounded in combat, those who will grieve for them will forever be broken. In a very real way, the young men and women who serve our nation in combat or in our various three-letter agencies are our most valuable commodity. They stand watch on a wall most shun. They are our protectors. The neocons, politicians and pundits aching to send them into danger, often living in bubbles of entitlement and luxury thousands of miles from the battlefield, must never forget that. Nor should they forget that when the “winds of war” are fanned, the ripples soon spread like a toxic poison, which can stay in the global system for years. Back in March of 2003, the “nation-building” neoconservatives got their way with Iraq. Hundreds of thousands of men, women and children were killed or wounded as those ripples spread across that land — a land that, ironically, stood as a natural buffer to Iran. Today, we are at war with Iran. Some truly believe it is for vital reasons — mainly, to ensure that the maniacal leadership of Iran never builds a nuclear weapon. Others in and out of our government truly believe that we never should have attacked Iran, that the strategy we had in place was working and that, if we did attack, multiple negative consequences would be created with no viable off-ramps. As our leaders contemplate sending our protectors into combat, one question should be uppermost in everyone’s mind: Is it vital to the security of the U.S., or are these men and women potentially being sacrificed in the name of political and personal ambition, as a favor to another world leader, or for outright profiteering? And , as we ponder those critically important questions, another must be asked: Are some of the “ripples of war” now washing over, say, the citizens of Iran turning more and more of them against the people of the U.S.? These innocent men, women and children, it must never be forgotten, are victims of the brutal regime in Iran. What are the long-term implications of that unintended consequence? Is war sometimes necessary? Of course. But some would convincingly argue that every war since the conclusion of WWII has been a war of choice. Whose choice is it? Who has benefited from that choice, and who has paid the highest and most devastating of prices? Our Founding Fathers were the originators of the “America First” ideal. They were indeed wise men who strongly believed in the separation of church and state, and understood that for our nation to survive and flourish, no faith nor any other nation must come before it. I authored a book on the Founding Fathers, titled “The 56.” I truly believe that men like Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Benjamin Franklin would understand that the working class and disenfranchised of each country on earth are all in this together, against the all-powerful and often faceless elites. “America First” must ensure that the innocent, powerless civilians of any and every nation on earth, be it Iran, Israel, China, Russia, Ukraine, Venezuela, Cuba or even Canada, understand that the people of the United States are not their enemy. That, truly, is “America First.” Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official.
“美国优先”必须确保地球上任何国家的无辜、无权的平民——无论是伊朗、以色列、中国、俄罗斯、乌克兰、委内瑞拉、古巴,甚至加拿大——都明白美国人民不是他们的敌人。这才真正是“美国优先”。道格拉斯·麦金农曾任白宫和五角大楼官员。
There are far too many people of power and influence in our nation who have never met a war they did not love, profit from in some way, or both. The vast majority of these people have never served in the military, never walked point in combat, never supported special operations, never worked in country undercover — nor have any of their family members. Since the draft ended back in 1973, not serving in or around the military has become the norm for the vast majority of Americans. We must never forget the Americans who have continually enlisted in the military or honorably worked in the intelligence community since the end of the draft, stepping into harm’s way for the good of the nation. These patriotic young men and women are not meaningless statistics or cheap disposable pawns. They are human beings who hope and pray to have full lives of their own. They are sons, daughters, brothers, sisters and grandchildren. And should they be killed or wounded in combat, those who will grieve for them will forever be broken. In a very real way, the young men and women who serve our nation in combat or in our various three-letter agencies are our most valuable commodity. They stand watch on a wall most shun. They are our protectors. The neocons, politicians and pundits aching to send them into danger, often living in bubbles of entitlement and luxury thousands of miles from the battlefield, must never forget that. Nor should they forget that when the “winds of war” are fanned, the ripples soon spread like a toxic poison, which can stay in the global system for years. Back in March of 2003, the “nation-building” neoconservatives got their way with Iraq. Hundreds of thousands of men, women and children were killed or wounded as those ripples spread across that land — a land that, ironically, stood as a natural buffer to Iran. Today, we are at war with Iran. Some truly believe it is for vital reasons — mainly, to ensure that the maniacal leadership of Iran never builds a nuclear weapon. Others in and out of our government truly believe that we never should have attacked Iran, that the strategy we had in place was working and that, if we did attack, multiple negative consequences would be created with no viable off-ramps. As our leaders contemplate sending our protectors into combat, one question should be uppermost in everyone’s mind: Is it vital to the security of the U.S., or are these men and women potentially being sacrificed in the name of political and personal ambition, as a favor to another world leader, or for outright profiteering? And , as we ponder those critically important questions, another must be asked: Are some of the “ripples of war” now washing over, say, the citizens of Iran turning more and more of them against the people of the U.S.? These innocent men, women and children, it must never be forgotten, are victims of the brutal regime in Iran. What are the long-term implications of that unintended consequence? Is war sometimes necessary? Of course. But some would convincingly argue that every war since the conclusion of WWII has been a war of choice. Whose choice is it? Who has benefited from that choice, and who has paid the highest and most devastating of prices? Our Founding Fathers were the originators of the “America First” ideal. They were indeed wise men who strongly believed in the separation of church and state, and understood that for our nation to survive and flourish, no faith nor any other nation must come before it. I authored a book on the Founding Fathers, titled “The 56.” I truly believe that men like Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Benjamin Franklin would understand that the working class and disenfranchised of each country on earth are all in this together, against the all-powerful and often faceless elites. “America First” must ensure that the innocent, powerless civilians of any and every nation on earth, be it Iran, Israel, China, Russia, Ukraine, Venezuela, Cuba or even Canada, understand that the people of the United States are not their enemy. That, truly, is “America First.” Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official.