宛如伊林喜剧中的龙套演员……亚历克斯·马戈·阿登的账目。照片:杰克·埃利奥特·爱德华兹/© 艺术家。艺术委员会收藏,伦敦南岸中心。
Like extras from an Ealing comedy … Alex Margo Arden’s Accounts. Photograph: Jack Elliot Edwards/© the artist. Arts Council Collection, Southbank Centre London.
对外来者的恐惧是我们这个时代的核心议题。但我们真正害怕的,难道不是我们自己吗?艺术能否提供答案?在此,英国艺术展的策展人揭示了他为何要探索我们最深层的梦想与噩梦。基尔·斯塔默在唐宁街任职期间的道德低谷之一,便是他那篇“陌生人岛屿”的演讲。该演讲在修辞上令人联想到伊诺克·鲍威尔,并以令人沮丧的笔触描绘了一个因差异而四分五裂的国家。
Fear of outsiders is the defining issue of our times. But is it actually our own selves we’re scared of? And could art hold the answers? Here, the British Art Show’s curator reveals why he’s exploring our deepest dreams and nightmares ne of the moral low points of Keir Starmer’s tenure at Downing Street was his “island of strangers” speech, with its rhetorical echoes of Enoch Powell and dispiriting description of a nation fractured by difference. After widespread criticism, Starmer recanted his words, if not the sentiment behind them. Yet his choice of language was a reminder of how the idea of the stranger – representing immigration, but also wider, more inchoate anxieties about otherness and difference – holds such a potent place in Britain today.
在遭到广泛批评后,斯塔默收回了这番言论,尽管他并未否定其背后的情感。然而,他的措辞提醒我们,“陌生人”这一概念——既代表移民,也代表着更广泛、更模糊的对异质性和差异的焦虑——在当今英国占据着何等强大的地位。
In fact, from masked anti-migrant protesters on the south coast to xenophobic riots over the summer, from politicians vowing to stop the boats to immigration polling as the No 1 concern among UK voters, it’s probably true to say that fear of the stranger is the totemic issue of our times. Not long after Starmer’s speech, I was appointed curator of the British Show, which opens in Coventry this week.
事实上,从南海岸戴面具的反移民抗议者,到夏季的排外骚乱;从政客誓言阻止船只靠岸,到移民问题成为英国选民最关心的头号议题,可以说,对外来者的恐惧确实是我们时代的标志性议题。
My thoughts have turned increasingly to the notion of the stranger among us as I’ve worked on the exhibition.
斯塔默发表演讲后不久,我被任命为英国艺术展的策展人,该展览将于本周在考文垂开幕。在筹备展览的过程中,我越来越频繁地思考“我们中间的陌生人”这一概念。该展览由海沃德画廊巡回展开发并制作,是英国规模最大、最重要的当代艺术定期展览。
The show, developed and produced by Hayward Gallery Touring, is the largest and most significant recurring exhibition of contemporary art in the UK. Founded in 1979, the exhibition takes place every five years, touring across the country to offer a snapshot of the ideas and ambitions of a rising generation of artists born or based in Britain. Previous versions have brought the likes of David Hockney, Bridget Riley and Anish Kapoor to national audiences.
该展览始于1979年,每五年举办一次,在全国各地巡回展出,旨在呈现一批在英国出生或定居的新一代艺术家的理念与抱负。往届展览曾将大卫·霍克尼、布里奇特·莱利和安尼施·卡普尔等艺术家的作品带给全国观众。
This year is the 10th edition and it features a lineup of critically lauded artists including Alvaro Barrington, Lindsey Mendick and recent Turner prize winners Jesse Darling and Jasleen Kaur. Each new iteration prompts the same question: what does the show say about British art?
今年是该展览的第十届,参展艺术家包括备受赞誉的阿尔瓦罗·巴林顿(Alvaro Barrington)、林赛·门迪克(Lindsey Mendick),以及刚刚获得特纳奖(Turner Prize)的杰西·达林(Jesse Darling)和贾斯琳·考尔(Jasleen Kaur)。
Or, indeed, about Britain?
每一届展览都会引发同样的问题:这场展览究竟反映了英国艺术的哪些特点?或者说,它究竟反映了英国的哪些本质?在当今这个全球范围内遍布各种艺术博览会、双年展和大型画廊的当代艺术体系中,这个问题或许显得有些过时了。然而,任何旨在探讨当代艺术发展的展览,都不可避免地会揭示出这些艺术作品所源自的那个国家的某些特征。因此,谈论英国艺术,实际上也是在探讨我们作为个体、作为社区、作为国家的身份与归属感。
In the context of the globe-spanning fairs, biennales and mega-galleries that make up today’s contemporary art world, the question is possibly antique. Yet an exhibition tasked with addressing recent developments in art will inevitably reveal something about the country in which that work originates. To talk about British art, then, is also to talk about place and belonging. It is to ask who we are as individuals, as communities and as a nation. I’ve chosen to give the latest exhibition a subtitle: A Chorus of Strangers.
我为这次最新的展览选了一个副标题:“陌生人的合唱”(A Chorus of Strangers)。这个标题并非源自斯塔默(Starmer)的演讲,而是让人联想到英国历史上一个更为早期的时期——那个时期同样充满了对外来者的排斥与敌意。
The name is not a reference to Starmer’s speech, but it does gesture back to another much earlier period in British history also characterised by its antipathy to outsiders. Making the Strangers’ Case … an 1897 depiction of Thomas More pleading for compassion at the 1517 May Day riots.
1897年,托马斯·莫尔(Thomas More)在画作《为陌生人辩护》(Making the Strangers’ Case)中呼吁人们怜悯那些外来者。这幅画描绘了他在1517年五一暴乱期间试图平息民众愤怒的场景。
Photograph: Print Collector/Getty Images On 30 April 1517, the eve of the annual May Day festival, an angry crowd of more than 1,000 people marched through London protesting at the city’s immigrant population. Xenophobia was rife in Tudor England.
照片来源:Print Collector/Getty Images 1517年4月30日,即一年一度的五一节前夕,一群愤怒的群众在伦敦游行,抗议该市的外来人口。都铎时期的英格兰充斥着排外情绪:尽管被称为“陌生人”的外国人仅占城市人口的6%,但他们却常常被视为有害的存在——正如一位历史学家所描述的那样:“自由主义者、酒鬼、杀人犯、小偷以及阴谋家。”
Although foreigners, known as “strangers”, made up just 6% of the city’s population, they were often considered a malign presence: “Libertynes, drunkards, murderers, thieves and Conspirators,” in the words of one chronicler. As darkness fell, the mood turned ugly.
夜幕降临后,局势变得愈发恶劣。作为伦敦的副警长,托马斯·莫尔试图劝说群众停止暴力行为,但他的恳求被置若罔闻。暴民冲进街头,洗劫了法国人、意大利人和佛兰德商人的店铺和住宅。直到军队被调来、数十人被逮捕、十多人被处决后,秩序才得以恢复。
Thomas More, under-sheriff of London, appealed to the crowd to turn back. But his entreaties went unheard. The mob surged through the streets sacking the shops and houses of French, Italian and Flemish merchants and craftsmen. Only after an army was called out, leading to scores of arrests and over a dozen executions, was order returned.
五月一日暴乱,正如这场骚乱后来被称为的那样,并未被迅速遗忘。
Evil May Day, as the riot came to be known, was not quickly forgotten.
1591年,一部名为《托马斯·莫尔爵士》的新剧讲述了莫尔的兴衰历程,从市政领袖到亨利八世手下的大法官,随后因拒绝承认国王为英格兰教会首脑而被斩首。该剧由多位作者合作创作。其中最著名的是威廉·莎士比亚,他重述了莫尔与伦敦暴民的遭遇。在莎士比亚的版本中,莫尔通过为“陌生人辩护”,成功平息了人群,这是一份用同理心取代仇恨与偏见那“山一般非人道”行径的激情呼吁。
In 1591 a new play, Sir Thomas More, told the story of More’s rise and fall, from civic leader to Lord Chancellor under Henry VIII and his subsequent beheading for refusing to accept the king as head of the Church of England. The drama was written collaboratively by several authors. Most prominent among them was William Shakespeare, who revisited More’s encounter with the London mob. In Shakespeare’s telling, More successfully calms the crowd by making “the Strangers’ Case”, a passionate call for empathy in place of the “mountainish inhumanity” of hatred and bigotry.
莎士比亚的这一场景至今仍让人感到震撼且切题。这不仅因为当时的暴民暴力与当今相似,更因为《陌生人辩护》提醒我们:数百年来,艺术家们在动荡时期通过捍卫我们共同的人性价值来回应。铭记这段历史,英国艺术展提出了这样的问题:当下的艺术如何面对在不确定与变革时期涌现的对他者性与差异的恐惧?
Shakespeare’s scene still feels powerfully relevant. Not just due to the similarity between mob violence then and now, but because the Strangers’ Case is a reminder of how, for hundreds of years, artists have faced times of discord by asserting the value of our shared humanity. With that past in mind, the British Art Show asks: how does art today meet the fears of otherness and difference that emerge in a period of uncertainty and change?
团结抗议……乔伊·格拉德,《为巴勒斯坦游行,柏林》,2024年。照片:艺术家及Cristea Roberts画廊提供让我们稍作思考:陌生人的概念不仅描述了一种社会状况,也描述了一种心理状况。是的,陌生人指代令人恐惧的局外人。但正如哲学家朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃所言,我们常是“自己对自己的陌生人”,困于心灵的奥秘之中。陌生人可能是一种被压抑的情感,或一段我们难以承认的记忆,它的存在使我们对世界的看法变质,将他人变成我们自身焦虑的投射。
United in protest … Joy Gerrard, March for Palestine, Berlin, 2024. Photograph: courtesy of the artist and Cristea Roberts Gallery Let’s reflect for a moment that the idea of the stranger describes a psychological as well as a social condition. Yes, the stranger denotes a feared outsider. But as the philosopher Julia Kristeva says, we are often “strangers to ourselves”, caught within the mysteries of our psyche. The stranger might be a repressed feeling or a memory that we struggle to acknowledge, its presence curdling our view of the world, turning others into projections of our own anxieties.
越来越让人感觉,当我们谈论前者——作为局外人的陌生人时,实际上指的却是后者——作为“他者”的陌生人,一种不安与失衡的感觉;一种时代错位的感觉,本该由未来带来财富与安逸的种种承诺,却让我们发现自己漂泊无依、迷失方向。正如哲学家马歇尔·伯曼在《一切坚固的都烟消云散:现代性的体验》中所写:“成为现代人,就是发现我们身处一种环境中,它向我们许诺冒险、权力、欢愉、成长、自我与世界的变革——而同时,它又威胁要摧毁我们拥有的一切、所知的一切、我们存在的一切。”
More and more, it feels as though, when we’re talking about the former, the stranger as outsider, what we’re actually referring to is the latter, the stranger as other, a feeling of unease and disequilibrium; a sense that the times are out of joint, and that instead of all the promises of wealth and ease that the future was supposed to bring, we find ourselves unmoored and lost. As the philosopher Marshall Berman wrote in All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity: “To be modern is to find ourselves in an environment that promises us adventure, power, joy, growth, transformation of ourselves and the world – and, at the same time, that threatens to destroy everything we have, everything we know, everything we are.”
你可以在民意调查中听到这种恐惧的回响——根据“共同点”组织2025年《破碎的英国》报告,十分之七的人担心英国“走上了歧途”——也能在理论家给当下时代贴上的绝望标签中听到,诸如“新黑暗时代”和“失衡时代”。
You can hear echoes of that dread in public polling – seven in 10 people fear the UK is “on the wrong track”, according to More in Common’s 2025 Shattered Britain report – and in the despairing labels given by theorists to our current era, such as the New Dark Age and the Age of Unhingement.
然而,在不确定的时代,艺术可以成为一座灯塔。当我们走进展览,便抛弃了那种只想用“我们对他们”来看世界的简化思维。我们跨入了一个充满复杂性、矛盾与创造性丰富性的领域。我们采纳了局外人的视角,以陌生人的眼睛重新审视世界。“当你是个陌生人时,你既在其中又在之外。你在那里,却并不真正在那里,”埃杰·特梅尔库兰在《陌生人的国度:二十一世纪重建家园》中写道。
Yet in uncertain times art can be a beacon. When we enter an exhibition, we leave behind the reductive thinking that only wants to see the world in terms of us versus them. We cross into a realm of complexity, contradiction and creative richness. We take on the point of view of an outsider, seeing the world anew with the eyes of a stranger. “When you are a stranger, you are both in and out. You are there but not really,” writes Ece Temelkuran in Nation of Strangers: Rebuilding Home in the 21st Century.
陌生人一词标志着“一种纯粹的好奇心”。它描述的是“那些尚未被对异己的恐惧所毒害的人”。所有“觉得我们这个时代太过陌生,以至于不愿在它的怪诞行径中成为同谋”的人。
The term stranger signifies “a pure form of curiosity”. It describes “those who are still not poisoned by the fear of the alien”. All those “to whom our time seems too strange to become complicit in its monstrosities”.
这种开放与探索的感觉为许多参加英国艺术展的艺术家所共有。例如,亚历克斯·马戈·阿登的雕塑《账目》将国家汽车博物馆退役的男性模特用一根粗绳串联在一起。这件作品或许暗示了去工业化或男性气概的穷途末路。声音高扬……朱利安克尼克斯的《转移/精神/时间》剧照。
This sense of openness and discovery is shared by many of the artists in the British Art Show. For example, Accounts, a sculpture by Alex Margo Arden, ties together decommissioned male mannequins from the National Motor Museum with a thick length of rope. The work might gesture to deindustrialisation or exhausted ideas of masculinity. Voices raised … a still from Julianknxx’s Shifting/ Spirit/Time.
摄影:© Studioknxx 但看着那些满面红光、侧分发型的男人,就像伊林喜剧里自作聪明的群演,很难不觉得展出的东西既荒诞又滑稽。这种俏皮感反映了阿登对英国各地那些小而独特的私人博物馆的喜爱:她最喜欢的是北约克郡的维多利亚科学博物馆,该馆自夸是“惠特比地区排名第一的游客景点!”这些场所共同提供了一种英国的民间历史,它建立在讲故事、想象力以及阿登所谓的“记忆的记忆”之上,而非事实。
Photograph: © Studioknxx But it’s hard to look at the men’s florid faces and side-parted hair, like bumptious extras from an Ealing comedy, and not also find something absurd and comic on show. This playfulness reflects Arden’s delight in the small, idiosyncratic private museums dotted around Britain: a favourite of hers is the Museum of Victorian Science in North Yorkshire which it boasts is“Ranked Number 1 Visitor Attraction in the Whitby Area!”. These venues collectively offer a folk history of Britain, based less on fact than storytelling, imagination and what Arden calls the “memories of memories”.
马赫塔布·侯赛因与作家盖·古纳拉特内合作的电影《砖头来了》,通过一段狂热的蒙太奇,讲述了过去半个世纪英国南亚裔和穆斯林的生活故事:反穆斯林的足球口号、家庭VHS录像、伊斯兰恐惧症政客的演讲、旧种族主义电视节目的片段,以及2005年伦敦自杀式爆炸案的报道。片名指的是一块砖砸破亚裔店主店铺窗户、击中店主面部并打断其牙齿的事件。
Mahtab Hussain’s film Here Is the Brick, made with writer Guy Gunaratne, tells a story of south Asian and Muslim life in Britain over the past half century through a feverish montage of anti-Muslim football chants, family VHS recordings, speeches by Islamophobic politicians, excerpts from old racist TV programmes, and coverage of the 2005 London suicide bombings. The title refers to a brick thrown through the window of an Asian-owned shop that struck the storekeeper in the face, breaking his teeth.
然而影片以乐观基调收尾:利物浦球迷满座高唱赞美穆罕默德·萨拉赫:“如果他再进几个球,我也要改信伊斯兰教。” 其他艺术家则探讨我们如何在现代世界令人无力的结构中争取主体性。在梅拉尼·曼肖和朱利安克尼克斯的电影中,以及乔伊·杰拉德描绘抗议人群的墨水画里,有舞蹈、歌唱、涌上街头的躯体:这是对一种常将个体置于资本力量支配之下的现状的拒绝;转而坚持聚集的价值、发声的价值、共同行进或游行的价值。
Yet the film ends on an optimistic note with a stadium full of Liverpool fans singing in praise of Mo Salah: “If he scores another few, I’ll be a Muslim too.”Other artists explore how we might claim a sense of agency within the disempowering structures of the modern world. In films by Melanie Manchot and Julianknxx, and in Joy Gerrard’s ink drawings of protesting crowds, there is dancing, singing, bodies surging on to the streets: a rejection of a status quo that is so often based on the subjection of the individual to the forces of capital; and an insistence instead on the value of gathering, of raising voices and moving or marching together.
因此,《陌生人的合唱》并非一座被差异隔绝的孤岛,而是一首献给可能性的赞歌。通过参展艺术家的作品,展览找到了大量证据表明:如果我们不听从分裂的号召,而是选择透过他人的眼睛看世界,生活可能会更丰富、更奇妙地陌生、也更陌生地奇妙。
Rather than an island separated by difference then, A Chorus of Strangers offers a hymn to possibility. Through the work of the participating artists, the exhibition finds abundant evidence that life might be richer, more wonderfully strange and strangely wonderful if, instead of heeding calls to division, we choose to look at the world through the eyes of others.