华盛顿——美国最高法院周二解除了对将移民驱逐到非其本国国家的限制,同时同意在12月就该问题的实质内容进行审理。
Washington – The US Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted restrictions on the deportations of immigrants to countries that are not their own, while agreeing to hear the issue on its merits in December.
这个以保守派为主的最高法院批准了特朗普政府的紧急请求,暂停了下级法院的裁决。该下级法院的裁决虽然限制了这种驱逐行为,但并未完全禁止它。
The conservative-dominated high court granted an emergency request by the Trump administration to suspend a lower court ruling that restricted, but did not outright ban, so-called "third-country removals".
下级法院表示,被驱逐的移民必须提前收到关于他们将被送往何地的确切信息,以便他们能够对可能面临的迫害提出质疑。
The lower court had said people targeted with deportation must be given effective notice ahead of time about where they are being sent to allow them to raise concerns about potential persecution.
在由9名大法官组成的最高法院中,3名持自由派观点的大法官表示他们不会批准政府的请求。
The three liberal justices on the nine-member bench said they would not have granted the administration's request.
唐纳德·特朗普总统在竞选期间曾承诺将数百万非法移民驱逐出美国,并自2021年上任以来采取了一系列措施以加快驱逐进程。
President Donald Trump campaigned on promises to expel millions of undocumented migrants from the United States and has taken several actions aimed at speeding up deportations since returning to the White House in 2025.
为实施这一大规模驱逐计划,特朗普政府辩称将移民驱逐到第三国是必要的,因为一些被驱逐者的原籍国有时拒绝接收他们。
The global machinery built to carry out Trump’s mass deportation drive The Trump administration has defended third-country deportations as necessary since the home nations of some of those who are targeted for removal sometimes refuse to accept them.
在提交给最高法院的文件中,反对解除这些限制的人士指出,下级法院的裁决并未完全禁止将移民驱逐到第三国,只是要求政府必须依法行事。
In a brief to the Supreme Court, opponents of lifting the restrictions argued that the lower court ruling did not fully block all third-country deportations, "it simply requires them to do so lawfully".
特朗普政府的司法部长约翰·索尔向最高法院表示,将移民迅速驱逐到第三国是“驱逐某些外国人(包括那些犯有严重罪行的外国人)的重要手段”;他还称下级法院的裁决给驱逐工作带来了严重的后勤问题。
Trump's solicitor general, John Sauer, meanwhile told the court that the rapid deportation to third countries was "an essential tool to remove certain aliens, including some of the worst criminal aliens." The lower court ruling "created substantial logistical problems" with removals, he said.
法新社的调查发现,美国曾向一些第三国(尤其是非洲国家)提供数百万美元的补偿,并威胁对其实施签证限制,以促使这些国家接收被驱逐的移民。
An AFP investigation found that the US has offered multimillion-dollar deals and threatened visa restrictions in a bid to get "third countries," especially in Africa, to take such deportees.
一旦被驱逐到这些国家(这些国家均不在美国的司法管辖范围内),被驱逐者可能会遭到当地警卫的虐待、被无限期拘留,或者被迅速遣返回原籍国。
Once in these countries – and outside US jurisdiction – deportees have been subject to abuse by local guards, indefinite detention, or quickly re-deported to their home countries.
根据上周发布的一项调查报告,美国通过与35个国家达成的秘密协议,驱逐了超过2.5万名与这些国家毫无关联的移民。
According to an investigation published last week, the United States has deported more than 25,000 people under secretive agreements with 35 countries to take migrants with no ties to those nations.
《Forbidden Stories》的调查显示,美国政府已拨款4.1亿美元,直接支付给接收这些移民的国家或联合国机构,以协助完成驱逐程序。
The investigation by Forbidden Stories found the administration has earmarked $410 million to be paid directly to the receiving countries, or to United Nations agencies to facilitate the returns.
其中绝大多数被驱逐者(约2万人)被送往墨西哥,其余人则被分散到拉丁美洲、非洲和太平洋地区的27个国家;此外,美国还与另外7个国家达成了类似的驱逐协议。
The vast majority of the deportees – around 20,000 – were sent to Mexico, but the rest were dispersed to 27 other countries across Latin America, Africa, and the Pacific, and agreements have been finalized with seven more.
在美国国内,国会规定:不得将移民驱逐到那些他们的生命会受到威胁或可能遭受酷刑的国家。
Inside the US system deporting migrants through African countries Congress has made it US policy not to deport people to countries where their lives would be in danger or they could be subject to torture.
在最高法院作出相关裁决后,一些民主党议员呼吁采取更规范的措施来防止此类驱逐行为,并确保程序的合法性。
After the high court's ruling, some Democratic lawmakers were calling for more formalized steps to prevent such deportations and uphold due process.
众议院民主党议员洛伊丝·弗兰克尔表示:“国会必须介入。任何人都不应在没有基本法律程序保障、也没有机会表达自身安全担忧的情况下被驱逐到异国他乡。”另一位民主党议员罗布·梅嫩德斯则称最高法院的裁决“毫无道理可言”。
"Congress must step in. No one should be shipped off to a country that is not their own without basic due process and a meaningful opportunity to raise legitimate fears for their safety," House Democrat Lois Frankel said on Rob Menendez, another congressional Democrat, called the Supreme Court's decision "indefensible".
“纳税人不应为将人们从他们唯一熟悉的家园中强行驱逐出去的行为提供资金支持;我们的法律体系也不应加速这种单方面的驱逐行为。”
"Taxpayers shouldn't fund tearing people from the only home they've ever known, nor should our legal system fast-track these unilateral deportations."