字号 ·· | 护眼
阿纳多卢通讯社

美国特使警告:欧盟推动“购买欧洲产品”防务倡议可能割裂跨大西洋防务工业体系"US envoy warns EU’s ‘Buy European’ defense push could fragment transatlantic defense industry

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

布鲁塞尔(AA)——美国驻欧盟大使安德鲁·普兹德(Andrew Puzder)周三警告称,该集团优先采用欧洲制造武器的努力可能导致跨大西洋防务工业体系碎片化。

BRUSSELS (AA) - US Ambassador to the European Union Andrew Puzder warned Wednesday that the bloc’s efforts to prioritize European-made weapons could fragment the transatlantic defense industrial base.

普兹德在布鲁塞尔举行的 Euronews 国防与太空峰会上表示,军事能力和可获得性应优先于防务装备的地理来源。

Speaking at Euronews’ Defense and Space Summit in Brussels, Puzder said military capability and availability should take precedence over the geographic origin of defense equipment.

他说:“只有当我们失去重点,无法确保拥有最有效的武器并支持共同防御时,我们的敌人才会从中受益。”

“Only our enemies benefit when we lose focus on making sure we have the most effective weapons, supporting our mutual defense,” he said.

普兹德补充道:“一旦某个成员国遭到强大对手攻击,我们都会庆幸自己把重点放在了武器优势而非地区经济上。”

“One attack by a powerful adversary on a member state, and we’ll all be glad that we focused on weapon superiority rather than regional economics,” Puzder added.

这位大使强调:“当生命受到威胁时,决定解决方案的应该是能力和可获得性,而不是地理因素。”欧盟委员会和欧盟成员国一直在推进旨在加强该集团防务工业并减少对美国制造武器依赖的提案。

The ambassador stressed that “when lives are at stake, capability and availability should determine the solution, not geography.”The European Commission and EU member states have been advancing proposals aimed at strengthening the bloc’s defense industry and reducing reliance on US-made weapons.

欧盟的这一倡议导致成员国意见分化,一些政府警告不要采取保护主义措施,并强调获得美国防务能力的重要性。

The EU initiative has divided member states, with some governments cautioning against protectionist measures and stressing the importance of access to US defense capabilities.

普兹德表示,欧盟委员会已表明,无意阻止欧盟成员国使用国家资金购买美国武器系统。

Puzder said the European Commission had indicated it had no intention of preventing EU member states from using national funds to purchase US weapons systems.

他说,目标应当是“建立一个以团结和力量而非分裂和私利来共同应对对手的联盟”。

He said the goal should be “an alliance which faces our adversaries with unity and strength rather than division and self-interest.”