与伊朗的战争对美国人的钱包、政府开支和美国外交政策都产生了重大影响。在距离2026年美国中期选举还有数月之际，这场战争也已成为重塑政治格局的关键因素。
The war with Iran has had major implications for Americans’ wallets, government spending and US foreign policy. It’s also been key in reshaping the political landscape as it enters its seventh month before the 2026 US midterms.
我们将在2026年10月6日（周二）美国东部时间中午12点，在《卫报》美国网站上举办一场中期选举实时问答活动，届时我们的政治和外交政策记者小组将帮助读者了解这场战争的代价，以及对特朗普和11月参选候选人带来的政治后果。
We’ll be hosting a live midterm election Q&A on Tuesday 6 October 2026 at 12pm EDT on the Guardian US site, with a panel of our politics and foreign policy reporters to help readers understand the costs of the war and political consequences for Trump and candidates running in November.
如果你对与伊朗的战争可能如何影响中期选举结果有疑问，我们希望听到你的声音——并且一定要收看我们10月6日的直播对话，记者们可能会对你的问题作出解答。
If you have a question about how the war with Iran could shape midterm election results, we’d like to hear from you – and be sure to tune in to our live conversation on 6 October, as reporters may have an answer to your question.
美国政治团队正在举办一系列读者问答活动，为11月的美国中期选举预热。请在此查看我们的前两场对话：
The US politics team is hosting a series of reader Q&As leading up to the November US midterm elections. See our first two conversations , here:
- _中期选举中为候选人提供资金支持的是哪些团体？_你可以在下方表单中提交问题，供我们的直播问答小组解答。
- The makeup of the Democratic party, plus key races to watch * Who are the groups financially backing the candidates in the midterms? You can share your question for our live Q&A panel in the form below.
如果你年满18岁，请分享你的故事，也可以匿名。如需了解更多信息，请参阅我们的服务条款和隐私政策。
Please share your story if you are 18 or over, anonymously if you wish. For more information please see our terms of service and privacy policy.
你的回复可以匿名，且是安全的，因为表单经过加密，只有《卫报》能够访问你的内容。我们只会将你提供的数据用于本专题目的，并在不再需要时将删除所有个人数据。如需其他安全联系方式，请参阅我们的提示指南。你住在哪里？
Your responses, which can be anonymous, are secure as the form is encrypted and only the Guardian has access to your contributions. We will only use the data you provide us for the purpose of the feature and we will delete any personal data when we no longer require it for this purpose. For alternative ways to get in touch securely please see our tips guide. Where do you live?
请简单介绍一下你自己（例如年龄、背景、职业）选填 你想了解与伊朗的战争如何影响了美国人，以及他们将在美国中期选举中如何投票？选填 请尽可能提供详细信息。
Tell us a bit about yourself (e.g. age, background, what you do) Optional What do you want to know about how the war with Iran has impacted Americans and how they’ll vote in the US midterms? Optional Please include as much detail as possible.
您还有其他关于美国中期选举的问题吗？或者有哪些政治话题您想进一步了解？（可选）如果您提供您的联系方式，我们将非常感谢；这些信息仅会由《卫报》（The Guardian）查看。
Do you have any other US midterm election questions you’d like us to answer, or political topics you’d like to learn more about? Optional Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. You can add more information here Optional If you include other people's names please ask them first.
（如果您需要添加更多信息，请在此处填写；如果需要提及他人的名字，请事先征得他们的同意。）通过提交您的回复，您即表示同意与我们分享您的个人信息，以便我们为您提供相关服务。
By submitting your response, you are agreeing to share your details with us for this feature. If you’re having trouble using the form, click here. Read the terms of service here and our privacy policy here. ## In 33 days, our democracy faces a critical test…With the midterm elections approaching, voters need fact-based reporting to decide the future of our country.
如果您在使用该表格时遇到困难，请点击此处。请在此处阅读我们的服务条款和隐私政策。
Facing declining popularity, Donald Trump is accelerating his attacks on journalists’ First Amendment rights.
33天后，我们的民主制度将面临一场关键的考验…… 随着中期选举的临近，选民需要基于事实的报道来决定国家的未来。由于支持率持续下降，唐纳德·特朗普正在加紧攻击记者的言论自由（即《美国宪法第一修正案》赋予的权利）。在您关闭此页面之前，我们能否请您在这个关键时刻支持《卫报》，以维护美国的新闻自由？
Before you close this tab, can we ask you to support the Guardian at this critical time for journalism in the US? The assault on the free press makes it more difficult to report on top election issues like the war in Iran, immigration enforcement, and AI’s potentially existential threat to humanity. Most recently, Trump banned CNN, MS Now and Politico from the White House, in retaliation for “negative” coverage.
对新闻自由的打压使得报道诸如伊朗战争、移民政策以及人工智能对人类可能构成的威胁等重大议题变得更加困难。
While a federal judge has restored White House access for now, saying the ban is likely unconstitutional, Trump is still blocking CNN from Air Force One.
最近，特朗普以这些媒体进行了“负面”报道为由，禁止它们进入白宫；虽然一名联邦法官暂时恢复了这些媒体进入白宫的权限（并指出该禁令可能违反宪法），但特朗普仍禁止CNN使用“空军一号”（总统专机）进行报道。
At the same time, Trump is using the FCC – which is supposed to be an independent regulator in the public interest – to settle political scores: The FCC targeted ABC after Jimmy Kimmel made a joke about the First Lady, and Trump suggested that the agency should punish the host of Meet the Press for making a factual statement the president disliked.
与此同时，特朗普正在利用美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）——这个本应代表公众利益进行监管的机构——来报复政治对手：在吉米·坎摩尔（Jimmy Kimmel）对第一夫人开玩笑后，FCC针对ABC电视台采取了行动；特朗普还暗示该机构应该惩罚《Meet the Press》节目的主持人，仅仅因为主持人发表了一句令他不满的客观事实。
The Pentagon, meanwhile, fired the editor of Stars and Stripes newspaper for “insubordination” shortly after they reported on a suicide attempt aboard the USS Lincoln, the Navy aircraft carrier reported to be in dire straits after 10 months at sea. Making matters worse, many of the US’s largest news organizations are now owned by billionaires whose personal and business interests may imperil the outlets’ editorial independence.
与此同时，五角大楼以“抗命”为由解雇了《星条旗报》的编辑，此前该报刚刚报道了“林肯”号航空母舰上发生的一起自杀未遂事件，据报道，这艘海军航母在海上部署10个月后已陷入困境。
Media critics have observed how CBS News, now owned by a Trump ally, has softened its coverage; CNN could be taken over by the same billionaire; and Jeff Bezos has imposed extreme staff cuts and editorial interventions at the Washington Post.
更糟糕的是，美国许多最大的新闻机构现在都由亿万富翁拥有，他们的个人和商业利益可能危及这些媒体的编辑独立性。媒体评论家观察到，现由特朗普盟友拥有的CBS新闻软化了其报道；CNN可能被同一位亿万富翁收购；而杰夫·贝索斯在《华盛顿邮报》实施了大规模裁员和编辑干预。
When freedom is under attack, it falls to a determined few news organizations to ensure the full truth still reaches the public. The Guardian is owned neither by a billionaire nor a corporation and remains dedicated to keeping trustworthy journalism paywall-free for the world.
当自由受到攻击时，责任落在少数坚定的新闻机构身上，以确保完整的真相仍能传达给公众。《卫报》既不由亿万富翁拥有，也不由公司拥有，依然致力于为世界提供无付费墙的可信新闻。
**Despite the risks of maintaining our fierce independence, what sustains us – and fills us with deep gratitude – is the unwavering support we’ve seen from readers. A majority of our funding comes directly from readers.
尽管保持我们的强硬独立性伴随着风险，但支撑我们前行、并让我们深怀感激的是读者坚定不移的支持。我们大部分资金直接来自读者。您的支持不仅推动了我们的工作，更重要的是，它保障了支撑我们编辑自由和勇气的财务独立性。 我们知道，请求支持不如我们的新闻报道受欢迎，但没有这些支持，我们的新闻就无法存在。当然，我们理解有些读者无力支持我们，如果您是这种情况，我们同样珍视您的阅读。
Your support not only powers our work, but more importantly, it safeguards the financial independence that underpins our editorial freedom and courage. We know our requests for support are not as welcome as our journalism, but without them our journalism wouldn’t exist. Of course, we understand that some readers are not in a position to support us, and if that is you, we value your readership no less. If you can, please support us today. We’re especially grateful for anyone able to set up a monthly contribution: reliable funding is vital for sustaining us throughout this dangerous period.
如果您能，请今天就支持我们。我们特别感激任何能够设置每月捐款的人：可靠的资金对于在整个危险时期维持我们的运营至关重要。捐款只需37秒。感谢您保护自由新闻。 单次支持仅需1美元 欢迎任何金额、任何时间的支持——无论您选择捐赠1美元还是更多解锁全通道数字权益：
It takes just 37 seconds to give. Thank you for protecting the free press. Support once from just $1 lcome support of any size, any time - whether you choose to give $1 or more UnlockAll-access digital**benefits: