本文涉及自杀话题。如果您或您认识的人有自杀念头，请拨打自杀与危机求助热线 988 或 800-273-TALK (8255)。
This story discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988 or 800-273-TALK (8255).
《观点》节目联合主持人周三批评了 Lindsay Clancy 的辩护律师 Kevin Reddington，指责他似乎在“移动门框”，暗示缺乏证据证明她杀害了自己的孩子。
"The View" co-hosts criticized Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney Kevin Reddington on Wednesday for seemingly "moving the goalposts" by suggesting a lack of evidence that she killed her children.
节目中，这档 ABC 日间脱口秀节目的几位女主持人讨论了 Reddington 似乎改变策略的情况。此前他提交了一份动议，要求法官作出无罪判决，理由是控方未能提供充分证据，证明 Clancy 毫无合理怀疑地杀害了她的三个孩子。
During the show, the women of the ABC daytime talk show discussed Reddington appearing to change strategies after he submitted a motion for a required finding of not guilty on the grounds that the prosecution did not provide sufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy killed her three kids.
“证据在哪里证明她做了这件事？”Reddington 周二在法庭上向 William Sullivan 法官问道，“哪里有证据证明她做了这件事？” Lindsay Clancy 律师请求法官直接宣判无罪，终结案件并禁止重审 这标志着 Reddington 的法律论点发生了重大转变。在审判期间，Reddington 并未争辩 Clancy 杀害了孩子这一事实，而是辩称她因产后精神病发作，不负刑事责任。
"Where’s the evidence that she did this?" Reddington asked Judge William Sullivan in court Tuesday. "Where is the evidence she did this?" LINDSAY CLANCY'S ATTORNEY ASKS JUDGE TO ACQUIT HER OUTRIGHT, ENDING CASE AND BARRING A RETRIAL This marked a significant shift in Reddington's legal argument. During the trial, Reddington did not dispute that Clancy killed her children, but argued that she was not criminally responsible due to postpartum psychosis.
考虑到 Reddington 此前的论点已经预设 Clancy 确实杀害了孩子，《观点》小组对这一新主张持怀疑态度。
"The View" panel was skeptical of this new claim considering Reddington's previous argument already presumed that Clancy had, in fact, killed her children.
“我的下巴都惊掉了，因为辩方的整个论点都建立在她患有产后精神病的基础上。她因精神失常不负刑事责任，但在精神病状态下实施了这起罪行，现在他却说，‘我们甚至不知道她是不是做的，’” Alyssa Farah Griffin 评论道。
"My jaw was on the floor because the defense’s entire argument hinged on she had postpartum psychosis. She wasn’t responsible by reason of insanity but she — in a psychotic state — did this crime, and now he’s like, ‘We don’t even know if she did it,’" Alyssa Farah Griffin remarked.
联合主持人 Sara Haines 认为 Reddington 合理地指出了证据中的漏洞，但补充说，她不认识任何认为应该完全不追究责任的人。
Co-host Sara Haines suggested Reddington reasonably pointed out holes in the evidence but added that she knows no one who believes there should be no accountability.
现在我觉得律师有点在变动底线，但如果你读他的描述……有很多漏洞。所有决定都基于假设她做了。但随后有人质疑她重复的所有内容是否已被告知，因为她在医院里没有记忆，"海恩斯说。
"Now I feel like the lawyer is moving the goalposts a bit, but if you read his description ... there were a lot of holes. Everything was decided on that it was assumed she did it. But there was a question then about everything that she was repeating had been recounted to her because she had no memory in the hospital," Haines said.
罗根·谢德斯：支持林赛·克兰西，表示如果父亲因同一罪行受审，他们不会集会。前律师桑尼·霍斯汀对雷丁顿的批评最为严厉，他称他的论点是“糟糕的说法”。“我不明白你怎么能在整个审判中辩称她做了，但她因精神分裂发作和产后精神病而不负刑事责任，然后又在同一位法官面前转变立场说没有证据表明她做了。我认为那是糟糕的说法，”霍斯汀说。 "我不相信他不在抖音上，"海恩斯回答。 "这感觉像极了阴谋论，根本没有法律依据，我不喜欢这个新立场，"霍斯汀补充道。
ROGAN SHREDS SUPPORTERS OF LINDSAY CLANCY, SAYS THEY WOULDN'T RALLY IF A FATHER WERE ON TRIAL FOR SAME CRIME Sunny Hostin, a former lawyer, had the harshest criticism against Reddington, calling his argument "a terrible take." "I don’t understand how you can spend an entire trial arguing that she did it but she is not criminally responsible because she was suffering from a psychotic episode and postpartum psychosis and then turn around in front of the very same judge and say there’s no evidence she did it. I think that is a terrible take," Hostin said. "I’m not convinced he’s not on TikTok," Haines replied. "It feels very conspiracy theory and not grounded in the law and I don’t love this new position," Hostin added.
在给福克斯新闻数字版的评论中，乔治华盛顿大学教授兼福克斯新闻撰稿人乔纳森·特利也批评了雷丁顿的新策略。 "凯文·雷丁顿似乎正在打造一套像1985年电影《线索》剧本一样的刑事辩护，为不同受众提供不同结局。在坚持克兰西杀害她的孩子后，他现在主张没有证据表明她杀害了孩子，"特利说。
In a comment to Fox News Digital, George Washington University professor and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley likewise criticized Reddington's new strategy. "Kevin Reddington appears to be crafting a criminal defense like the 1985 screenplay of ‘Clue’ with different endings for different audiences. After insisting that Clancy did kill her children, he is now arguing that there is no evidence showing that she killed her children," Turley said. He added, "Reddington says that the judge effectively prevented him from arguing that Clancy may not have committed the crime. If so, he should thank Judge Sullivan.
他补充道：“雷丁顿说，法官实际上阻止了他辩称克兰西可能没有犯下罪行。如果是这样，他应该感谢苏利文法官。他的精神错乱辩护建立在明显同情的陪审团基础上。主张这一替代理论可能会因侮辱陪审员的智商而疏远许多陪审员。”
His insanity defense built on a clearly sympathetic jury. Arguing this alternative theory would likely have alienated many jurors by insulting their intelligence." SUNNY HOSTIN'S HOLDOUT JUROR CLAIM COMPLICATED BY CONFLICTING REPORTS FROM INFAMOUS 1991 MURDER TRIAL Fellow Fox News contributor Gregg Jarrett also said Reddington has lost all credibility.
阳光霍斯汀的持异陪审员主张因1991年臭名昭著的谋杀审判的相互矛盾报道而变得复杂。福克斯新闻的同事格雷格·贾雷特也表示雷丁顿已失去所有可信度。
"At trial, he openly conceded that his client strangled her three young children. It was never in doubt or dispute. Now he's contradicting himself by saying something that's demonstrably untrue and utterly absurd.
“在审判中，他公开承认他的客户勒死了她的三个年幼孩子。这从未存在疑问或争议。现在他通过说出明显不真实且荒谬的事情来与自己相矛盾。当你作为律师这么做时，你会破坏你向法官提出的论点。你也在此过程中损害了你的客户。但鉴于雷丁顿公开攻击持异陪审员的荒唐行为，没有人应该感到惊讶。”
When you do that as a lawyer, you undermine the very argument you're making to the judge. And you've damaged your client in the process. But given the outrageous conduct of Reddington in publicly attacking the holdout juror, no one should be surprised."
克兰西将于11月2日再次回到法庭参加另一场动议听证会。她有待处理的动议，要求以双重危险为由驳回指控，并对持异陪审员展开调查。
Clancy is due back in court on Nov. 2 for another motion hearing. She has pending motions to dismiss the charges on double jeopardy grounds and to open an inquiry into the holdout juror.
尚未安排新的审判。检方和辩方都告诉法庭他们需要更多时间，雷丁顿表示他在2027年6月之前无法开始新的审判。
A new trial has not yet been scheduled. Both the prosecution and the defense told the court they needed more time, and Reddington said that he's not available to start one until June 2027.