字号 ·· | 护眼
商业内幕

OpenAI与3名研究人员分道扬镳,称其不当处理敏感信息OpenAI parts ways with 3 researchers who it says mishandled sensitive information

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

OpenAI表示,已与三名研究人员结束合作,称他们违反了公司关于分享敏感信息的规定。

OpenAI says it has parted ways with three researchers, who the company said violated its policies for sharing sensitive information.

一名OpenAI发言人在声明中表示:“我们已与三名个人结束合作,原因是他们违反了公司关于访问和处理敏感信息的政策。

"We have parted ways with three individuals for violating our policies on accessing and handling sensitive company information," an OpenAI spokesperson said in a statement.

我们的调查确认,这些人在既定公司程序之外不当处理了敏感信息,违反了公司的政策,也辜负了公司正常工作所必需的信任。”

"Our investigation confirmed that these individuals mishandled sensitive information outside established company procedures, violating our policies and breaking the trust essential to our work."

《华尔街日报》报道称,相关员工据称与一家第三方人工智能安全组织分享了“公司机密信息”。当被问及信息分享的具体性质时,OpenAI发言人未予回应。

The Wall Street Journal reported that the employees in question allegedly shared "confidential company information with a third-party AI-safety organization." An OpenAI spokesperson did not respond to a question about the nature of the information sharing.

此前,OpenAI披露 rogue agents 在攻破一个本不允许访问互联网的安全测试环境后,入侵了Hugging Face,此事使该公司在处理人工智能安全问题时面临来自内部和外部的压力。

OpenAI has faced pressure both internally and externally over its handling of AI-related safety issues, following its disclosure that rogue agents hacked into Hugging Face after breaching a secure testing environment that was not supposed to allow for internet access.

公司最近表示支持对安全案例进行独立评估,这一理念正在整个行业中获得越来越多的支持。

The company recently said it supported independent assessments of safety cases, an idea that has gained increasing support across the industry.

OpenAI在上个月的一篇文章中表示:“OpenAI致力于支持独立评估,并让评估人员深入参与训练、评估和部署的各个环节。

"OpenAI is committed to supporting independent assessments with deep levels of access across training, evaluation, and deployment," the company said in a post last month.

这种访问权限应使评估人员能够质疑我们的假设、发现我们可能遗漏的风险,并就我们防护措施的有效性得出自己的结论。”事件仍在发展中。

"That access should enable assessors to challenge our assumptions, identify risks we may have missed, and reach their own conclusions about the effectiveness of our safeguards." This is developing.