字号 ·· | 护眼
政治报

霍利测试特朗普对人工智能的“不干涉”方针Hawley tests Trump’s hands-off approach to AI

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

尽管立法前景黯淡,这位密苏里州共和党人仍在推动华盛顿采取行动。

The Missouri Republican is pushing Washington to act even as the prospects of legislation dim.

参议员乔什·霍利(Josh Hawley)在人工智能问题上的民粹主义立场,正暴露出共和党内部日益加剧的分歧。

议员们正试图在支持唐纳德·特朗普总统的“不干涉”监管方针,与回应选民对该技术风险的焦虑之间寻找平衡。

Sen. Josh Hawley’s populist push against artificial intelligence is exposing a growing rift within the Republican Party as lawmakers try to thread the needle between backing President Donald Trump’s hands-off approach to regulation and responding to voter anxiety about the technology’s risks.

霍利本周呼吁制定人工智能安全立法——包括在人工智能造成损害时追究企业责任——这与特朗普主张的自愿标准和行业自律方针形成了鲜明对比。

Hawley’s call for AI safety legislation this week — including imposing corporate liability when AI causes harm — contrasts with Trump’s approach to voluntary standards and the industry policing itself.

但随着越来越多的迹象表明选民担心大规模失业和经济动荡,霍利的做法为2028年大选中雄心勃勃的共和党人打下了反科技言论的明确标志。

But with more signs that voters fear mass job loss and economic disruption, Hawley’s approach places an unmistakable marker for anti-tech rhetoric in the 2028 campaign among ambitious Republicans.

共和党战略家杰森·罗(Jason Roe)对《政治报》(POLITICO)表示:“我认为每个人都感觉到,它不仅对我们的经济,而且对我们的生活方式产生的影响,是值得担忧的理由。

“I think everyone kind of feels like the impact that this is going to have — not just on our economy but on how we live our lives — is reason to be concerned,” GOP strategist Jason Roe told POLITICO.

我认为抓住这一点的政客可能会超越他们的基本盘,触及各自党派之外关心这一议题走向的选民。”这种不确定性最终可能会推动有关如何处理该技术的政治走向。

“I think the politicians that seize on it are going to probably reach beyond their base, to voters outside of their respective parties that care about where we’re going on this.”The uncertainty could ultimately drive the politics over how to approach the technology.