字号·· | 护眼
美联社

共和党人曾争相拥抱特朗普。如今他们的辩论回答却讲述了不同的故事Republicans once raced to embrace Trump. Their debate answers tell a different story now

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

美国参议院候选人、爱荷华州共和党众议员阿什利·欣森和康瑟尔布拉夫斯民主党众议员乔什·图雷克于2026年10月7日星期三在爱荷华州约翰斯顿举行的辩论中回答提问。(科迪·斯坎伦/得梅因纪事报通过美联社,联合采访团)U.S. Senate candidates Rep. Ashley Hinson, R-Iowa, and Rep. Josh Turek, D-Council Bluffs, take questions during a debate Wednesday, Oct. 7, 2026, in Johnston, Iowa. (Cody Scanlan/The Des Moines Register via AP, Pool)

共和党在全美范围内竞选参议院、众议院和州长职位的提名人,正在辩论中回避特朗普总统或公开与其划清界限,以应对大选日前的民主党对手。

Republican nominees for Senate, the U.S. House and governor’s offices across the country are sidestepping President Trump or openly distancing themselves as they debate Democratic opponents before Election Day.

比尔·巴罗 亚特兰大报道 —— 不久前,佐治亚州州长共和党提名人里克·杰克逊还热衷于将自己与椭圆形办公室的这位亿万富翁同僚相提并论。他承诺要做一位“带着南方腔调的唐纳德·特朗普”。在夏季的一场集会上共同登台时,杰克逊指着总统宣称:“我将成为这位先生最喜爱的州长。”

BILL BARROW ATLANTA — Not long ago, Georgia gubernatorial nominee Rick Jackson eagerly compared himself to his fellow billionaire in the Oval Office. He promised to be Donald Trump“with a Southern tone.”And sharing a summer rally stage, Jackson pointed at the president and declared, “I’m going to be this man’s favorite governor.”

然而,在本周与民主党对手的辩论舞台上,杰克逊只有在基莎·兰斯·博特姆斯提到特朗普时才谈及他。他向听众保证,自己会“对任何人挺身而出”。杰克逊并非孤例:全美竞选参议院、众议院和州长职位的共和党提名人,在大选日前的辩论中纷纷回避特朗普或公开与其保持距离。

On the debate stage this week with his Democratic opponent, however, Jackson discussed Trump only when Keisha Lance Bottoms brought him up. And he assured his audience that he’d “stand up to anybody.”Jackson is not alone in his recalibration: Republican nominees for Senate, the U.S. House and governor’s offices across the country are sidestepping Trump or openly distancing themselves as they debate before Election Day.

这些手法与共和党从竞选网站上清除特朗普痕迹如出一辙,是特朗普声望因选民对通胀、伊朗战争及其他事务的不满而大幅下滑的最新迹象。这种动态凸显了许多共和党人面临的险境:他们试图拼凑超越特朗普核心支持者的获胜联盟。

Those tactics, not unlike Republicans scrubbing Trump from their campaign websites, are the latest signs of how much Trump’s standing has fallen because of voters’ frustration with inflation, the Iran war and other matters. And the dynamics highlight the perilous options many Republicans face as they try to stitch together winning coalitions that go beyond Trump’s core supporters.

“共和党目前面临本党内部的选民投票率问题,”共和党民调专家保罗·舒梅克表示,必须赢得“最关心经济的无党派选民”。

“Republicans right now are facing a voter turnout problem” in their own party, said GOP pollster Paul Shumaker, and must win “unaffiliated voters” who care most about the economy.

舒梅克说:“你必须有重大举措来扭转这一叙事。”但他解释称,这意味着“在伊朗取得重大胜利”以及经济出现根本性改善——这并非任何共和党中期选举候选人能在辩论讲台上强行实现的。

“You have to have something significant to change this narrative,” Shumaker said. But, he explained, that means “a significant victory in Iran” and seismic economic improvements — not something any Republican midterm candidate can force from behind a debate podium.

在伊朗问题、关税和言辞上走钢丝 部分共和党人采取了与总统相悖的具体立场。

There’s a Trump tightrope on Iran, tariffs and rhetoric Some Republicans are taking specific positions at odds with the president.

密歇根州参议院候选人迈克·罗杰斯在周四与民主党人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德的辩论中表示,他曾私下敦促白宫与加拿大达成贸易协议,以取消总统实施的关税措施。加拿大不仅是密歇根州最大的贸易伙伴,也是众多五大湖地区及中西部各州的主要贸易对象。

Michigan Senate candidate Mike Rogers said in his debate Thursday with Democrat Abdul El-Sayed that he’d urged the White House privately to reach a trade deal with Canada and end the president’s tariffs. Canada is Michigan’s largest trading partner, as it is for many Great Lakes and Midwestern states.

几天前,罗杰斯发布了一则新广告,他在广告中称:“我们深知加拿大并非我们的敌人。我们必须立即结束这场关税战。”这一表态明显不同于他此前的言论——当时他虽称赞特朗普的“美国优先”经济政策,却并未明确表示反对关税措施,仅称其并非适用于所有情况的解决方案。

Days before, Rogers unveiled a new ad in which he said, “We know that Canada is not our enemy. We need to end the tariff war — now.”That’s a noticeable departure from Rogers’ earlier, less specific statements praising Trump’s “America First” economic agenda while saying tariffs are not a “one-size-fits-all” solution.

另一位密歇根州共和党人、众议员汤姆·巴雷特此前已违逆总统意愿,投票支持了旨在强化国会在伊朗军事行动方面权力的决议。本周一,在密歇根州中部选区与民主党人威尔·劳伦斯辩论时,巴雷特又对特朗普在内布拉斯加州发表的言论提出了批评。当时特朗普暗示伊朗有可能对圣地亚哥和洛杉矶发动袭击。

Another Michigan Republican, Rep. Tom Barrett, already had bucked the president by voting for a war powers resolution intended to assert congressional authority over military actions in Iran. But debating Democrat Will Lawrence in their central Michigan district, Barrett added a criticism of Trump’s rhetoric Monday in Nebraska, where he floated the possibility of Iran attacking San Diego and Los Angeles.

总统提及这两座城市,意在说明因伊朗问题引发的油价上涨不过是保障国家安全所需付出的“微小代价”。然而民主党人抓住这些言论大做文章,部分人甚至声称特朗普是在鼓动伊朗袭击美国城市。

The president mentioned those cities as part of his argument that higher gas prices because of his Iran war are a “small price to pay” to keep the country safe. But Democrats seized on the remarks, some insisting that Trump was calling for Iran to attack U.S. cities.

有人问巴雷特,特朗普的言论是否可以接受。面对可以借以引用白宫解释——即特朗普只是随口提及他试图避免的最坏情况——的机会,巴雷特并未为总统辩护。“不,”他干脆地答道。

Barrett was asked whether Trump’s words were acceptable. Given the opportunity to echo the White House explanation that Trump was offhandedly mentioning a worst-case scenario he was trying to prevent, Barrett offered no defense. “Nope,” he said flatly.

许多共和党人倾向于采取较为笼统的抵制态度。鉴于当前复杂的选情,多数共和党人试图与总统保持距离,但又不愿明确表露与总统的分歧。

Many Republicans prefer a more generalized stiff arm Reflecting the complex electoral balance, most Republicans have attempted to separate themselves without naming any firm difference with the president.

正在竞选参议员的爱荷华州联邦众议员阿什利·欣森,周三在与民主党人乔什·图雷克的辩论中试图调和自己此前作出的“在参议院做特朗普盟友”的承诺。她表示,既信守诺言又能保持跨党派合作其实“非常容易”——这一词汇如今已成为她竞选宣传中的常用词。

Running for a promotion to the Senate, Iowa U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson tried in her debate Wednesday against Democrat Josh Turek to reconcile her earlier promises to be a Trump ally in Congress’s upper chamber. She said it would be “really easy” to keep her word and still be bipartisan — a buzz word she’s already been featuring in her campaign.

“只要对爱荷华州有利,我就会成为唐纳德·特朗普总统的盟友;但对于那些对我们州不利的政策,我也会提出反对意见——他对此心知肚明,因为我经常与他沟通。”她说,“无论谁入主白宫、无论由谁执掌政权,我都会坚持这一原则。”这一策略与杰克逊在乔治亚州的做法如出一辙:他转而支持与特朗普立场相左的现任州长布赖恩·坎普——这位共和党人从特朗普声称自己赢得了2020年总统选举开始便与总统产生分歧。

“I’ll be President Donald Trump’s ally when it is important for Iowa, but I will push back on him — he knows this, because I talk to him regularly — on things that are wrong for our state,” she said. “That’s true no matter who’s in the White House. That’s true no matter who is governing and who has the gavel.”That’s the same path Jackson took in Georgia, as he pivoted away from Trump by embracing outgoing Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican who has clashed with the president starting with Trump’s false claims that he won Georgia in the 2020 presidential election.

“我会像布赖恩·坎普那样,敢于直面任何人的压力。”杰克逊说道。

“I will stand up to anybody, just like Brian Kemp has done,” Jackson said.

另一位共和党众议员、来自纽约州的迈克·劳勒则特意提及自己的民主党同僚——新泽西州的乔什·戈特海默,还谈到了两人计划共同推进的法案。他以此证明自己有能力挑战特朗普及党的既定路线。

Another Republican House member, Mike Lawler of New York, made a point of name-checking a Democratic colleague, New Jersey’s Josh Gottheimer, and discussing bills they’d work on together. It was part of his argument that he’s able to challenge Trump and the party line.

“我赞同总统意见时会直言不讳;若有不同意见,我同样会直截了当地表达。”他在总结陈词中说道。

“When I agree with the president I say it. When I disagree with the president, I say it,” he said in his closing remarks.

欣森则列举了自己在众议院推动并通过的多项法案——这些法案后来均得到了乔·拜登总统与特朗普的签署批准。

Hinson, meanwhile, referenced bills she’s worked on in the House that have been signed into law by both President Joe Biden and Trump.

不过,当被问及特朗普向部分民众发放《平价医疗法案》返款、并承诺若共和党保住参众两院控制权便发放5000美元奖励一事时,她并未对特朗普提出任何批评。

But she also avoided criticizing Trump when asked about the president sending Affordable Care Act rebate checks to some Americans and promising a $5,000 bonus after the midterm elections if Republicans retain control of the House and Senate.

她表示自己“极为关心”如何确保国会掌握财政大权,并认为“量体裁衣、合理开支”至关重要。无论共和党人采取何种举措,民主党人始终不断对他们发起攻击,就特朗普相关问题予以反驳。最激烈的交锋出现在民主党人凯特·康利反复指出劳勒总是投票支持特朗普之时。

She said she “cares very deeply” about making sure Congress maintains the power of the purse and thinks it’s important to “live better within our means.”Democrats pounce on either approach Regardless of the Republican efforts, Democrats have continued peppering them with attacks and retorts about Trump. The most heated moments came when Democrat Cait Conley repeatedly said Lawler always voted with Trump.

“不管你说多少次‘百分之百如此’,这都经不起事实检验,”这位众议员回应道。在与埃尔-赛义德的辩论中,罗杰斯承认政府的大规模驱逐计划“很可能”存在失误,对此民主党人迅速予以回应。

“No matter how many times you say 100% of the time,” the congressman answered, “it’s provably false.”When Rogers conceded in his back-and-forth with El-Sayed that the administration “probably” made errors in its mass deportation strategy, the Democrat answered swiftly.

“他说这‘很可能’不对。事实上,这绝对是错的,”埃尔-赛义德说道,“他们的行为导致两人丧生。”虽然佐治亚州的杰克逊谈及特朗普时显得有些局促,但博特姆斯却乐此不疲地提及他。

“He said it was probably not right. I mean, it’s definitely not right,” El-Sayed said. “They killed two people.”And while Georgia’s Jackson seemed uncomfortable talking about Trump, Bottoms was more than happy to mention him.

“我参选并非为了成为他最青睐的州长,”她说道,“我参选是为了为像各位这样的民众服务。” ___ 美联社记者乔伊·卡佩莱蒂(华盛顿)、汉娜·芬格胡特(艾奥瓦州得梅因)以及吉尔·科尔文(纽约)对本文亦有贡献。

“I’m not running to be his favorite governor,” she said. “I’m running to work on behalf of people like you.” ___ Associated Press reporters Joey Cappelletti in Washington; Hannah Fingerhut in Des Moines, Iowa; and Jill Colvin in New York contributed to this report.