学者洛娜·伍兹（Lorna Woods）反驳了美国政府关于澳大利亚计划等同于审查制度的说法。
Academic Lorna Woods rejects U.S. government claims that the Australian plan amounts to censorship.
作为数字关怀义务（digital duty of care）的学术奠基人，该制度目前正由阿尔巴尼斯政府在澳大利亚提出，她驳斥了特朗普政府关于该体制可能导致对不受欢迎观点进行审查的指控。
The academic architect of the digital duty of care, now proposed in Australia by the Albanese government, has rejected the Trump Administration’s charge that the regime could lead to censorship of disfavored views.
埃塞克斯大学互联网法教授洛娜·伍兹在澳大利亚对其《在线安全法》的审查中，被公认为数字关怀义务的主要倡导者之一。保罗·卡普（Paul Karp）通过电子邮件与伍兹进行了通信，讨论了澳大利亚政府的公开征求意见稿法案以及它将对社交媒体巨头施加的新义务。本访谈记录已经过删节和编辑以保证清晰度。
Lorna Woods, professor of internet law at Essex University, was credited in Australia’s review of its Online Safety Act as one of the leading proponents of the digital duty of care. Paul Karp corresponded with Woods by email to discuss the Australian government’s exposure draft bill and new obligations it would impose on social media giants. This transcript has been edited for length and clarity.
澳大利亚政府经常表示，由于其对16岁以下用户实施社交媒体账号禁令，它在社交媒体监管方面处于世界领先地位。数字关怀义务也是如此吗？
The Australian government often says it’s a world leader on social media regulation because of its under age 16 social media account ban. Is this also true of the digital duty of care?