
上周,在联合国大会上,特朗普总统向在场的各国发出“挑战”,呼吁大家“团结一致、坚强前行,共同对抗全人类的敌人”,从而“让这个世界变得更加美好与安全”。虽然我们很容易将特朗普的这番话视为空洞的修辞,但他所倡导的使命却是真实且至关重要的——遗憾的是,如今许多美国人却对此置若罔闻。近来,一种错误的世界观在华盛顿的当选官员中日益流行。
Last week at the United Nations General Assembly, President Trump issued a “challenge for every nation in this room” to “go forward strong and united against the enemies of all humanity” and, by doing so, “make this world a far better and safer place.”While it is tempting to write Trump’s words off as rhetorical fanfare, the mission they describe is real, critical and — unfortunately — now being dismissed by many in the U.S. Lately, a foolish worldview is growing in popularity among elected leaders in Washington.
从塔克·卡尔森到哈桑·皮克尔,许多人都宣扬这种观点。无论左派还是右派,都有人坚信:要解决美国的国内问题,就必须放弃在世界舞台上的领导地位。这种论调要求人们无视历史事实,相信美国正不可逆转地走向衰落,早已不复昔日的辉煌。然而,美国最美好的时光还在后头;我们必须积极投身于外交政策,才能保护美国民众及其生活方式。
You hear it from voices ranging from Tucker Carlson to Hasan Piker. Some on the left and right have become convinced that solving America’s domestic issues requires our retreat from leadership on the world stage. Their narrative requires us to ignore history and believe that America is in irreversible decline and has shriveled in form from her former greatness. But America’s best days are ahead, and we can and must stay energetically engaged in foreign policy to protect Americans and our way of life.
因此,我们必须认清:倘若美国退出国际舞台,倘若任由中国共产党制定规则、任由我们的敌人建立新的世界秩序,美国人的生活将会变成什么模样?这些常被包装成“民粹主义理念”的观点其实并非新鲜事物。近一个世纪前,当世界各地的邪恶势力开始威胁美国安全时,我们也曾面临类似抉择。1939年秋,大萧条带来的苦难笼罩着无数美国人的生活,与此同时纳粹德国入侵了波兰。
And so, we must be clear about what a U.S. retreat would mean and how American life would look if we allowed Communist China to write the rules and our enemies to establish a New World Order. These views, often sold as populist ideas, are nothing new. Nearly a century ago, America faced similar choices as evil around the world began to threaten our security. In the fall of 1939, the devastation caused by the Great Depression hung like a dark cloud over the lives of many Americans while Nazi Germany invaded Poland.
尽管欧洲的局势令人担忧,但当时华盛顿仍有不少“领袖”对普通民众宣称:当本国民众连工作都难以保住时,美国根本无暇顾及欧洲的安全。如今,当年轻一代为食品价格、电费开支以及养家糊口的难题而发愁时,同样的论调又被重新搬了出来。
While the news out of Europe was troubling, there were plenty of “leaders” in Washington telling hardworking families that America couldn’t possibly be worried about the security of Europe when our own citizens couldn’t guarantee the security of their own jobs. These are the same arguments being sold today as young Americans worry about grocery bills, the cost of electricity, and how they are going to afford to raise a family.
当然,所谓在全球领导力与国内繁荣之间做选择其实是个伪命题。美国梦的实现离不开美国在世界舞台上的领导地位——唯有如此,我们才能制定出能保护本国人民、保障经济安全并推动国家目标实现的规则。如果美国放弃其在世界上的主导地位,“美国优先”便无从谈起。我们希望看到一个足够强大的美国,既能震慑敌人,也能在战争爆发时赢得胜利。
Of course, the choice between global leadership and domestic prosperity is a false one. The American Dream depends on the United States’ leadership in the world, where we set rules in a way that protects the American people, secures our economy, and advances our goals. America First is not possible if America surrenders its position on the world stage. We want an America strong enough to deter our enemies and win a war if an adversary starts one.
但这并不意味着要深陷无休止的战争,或是开展那些毫无明确目标、看不到终点的政权更迭行动。塔克-派克阵营未能认清的事实是:美国依然面临诸多敌人。中国共产党、俄罗斯、伊朗、朝鲜和古巴已经结成反美联盟——一个由专制政权组成的同盟——企图削弱美国作为全球超级大国的地位,并切断美国与西方阵营的联系。
That does not mean getting entangled in forever wars and needless regime change operations with no goal and no endgame. What the Tucker-Piker camp fails to understand is that America still has enemies. Communist China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Cuba have created an anti-American coalition — an authoritarian alliance — to undercut us as the global superpower and sever the ties between the U.S. and the Western coalition.
问题还不止于此:俄罗斯在乌克兰发动战争,意在试探北约的意志,并让美国人误以为必须牺牲西方最古老、最繁荣的民主国家间的和平,否则就会面临灾难性战争。这些国家背后还有伊朗、朝鲜和古巴等专制政权撑腰,它们正齐心协力达成一个目的:削弱美国的影响力,用专制政权的势力取而代之,进而破坏西方所构建的世界秩序。
And it doesn’t end with China — Russia is waging a war of choice in Ukraine to test the resolve of NATO and to scare Americans into believing that they must surrender peace among their oldest and most prosperous Western democracies or risk catastrophic war. Those powers — supported by authoritarians in Iran, North Korea and Cuba — are consolidating with one goal: undermine the United States, replace its influence with those of authoritarian powers, and undermine the world that the West has built.
这一切正以不同层面、不同方式发生着。中国共产党利用西方国家对其经济的依赖,诱导我们的盟友顺从其利益诉求;俄罗斯则试图瓦解北约,以便从主权民主国家手中夺取领土;伊朗在破坏中东地区稳定并扰乱全球贸易秩序;与此同时,朝鲜一方面大力发展非法的核导弹计划,另一方面还向俄罗斯派遣士兵参与对乌战争。
This is happening at different levels and with different methods. The Chinese Communist Party is leveraging economic dependence against the West to bend our allies toward its interests. Russia is attempting to break NATO to claim territory from sovereign democratic nations. Iran is destabilizing the Middle East and global trade.
这四个国家正以各种形式相互协作,目标就是将美国及其海外军事基地与影响力逐出各自所在的地区。
Meanwhile, North Korea is investing in its illegal nuclear missile program while providing soldiers to Russia for its war against Ukraine.
就我们自身而言,几十年来古巴一直是西半球最具破坏性的不稳定因素。我毫不怀疑,我们的外部敌对势力也将信奉伊斯兰社会主义的哈桑·皮克视为可加以利用的国内工具——此人仅凭出生权才成为美国人。他主张消灭资本家,认为“9·11”事件情有可原,还积极为社会主义者竞选造势。事实再清楚不过:这个专制联盟一心要摧毁战后秩序,以及几代人用生命捍卫的权利与繁荣。
All four nations are collaborating in various ways, and aim to push the U.S., its forward deployed bases, and its influence out of their regions. In our own, Cuba has proven to be the greatest destabilizing force in the Western Hemisphere for decades. I have no doubt our foreign adversaries see a useful domestic asset in Islamist-Socialist Hasan Piker — an American via birthright citizenship only — who wants capitalists dead, believed 9/11 was justified, and campaigns for socialists in our elections. It cannot be any clearer: the authoritarian alliance desires the destruction of the postwar order, and the rights and prosperity generations have died defending.
如果我们退缩并任由这一联盟得逞,美国必将遭受重创。共产主义中国及其同伙会让我们陷入饥荒、孤立无援,并剥夺我们一切可用资源,直至美国变得软弱且依赖他人。届时我们将失去自主权、机遇与自由;金融市场也将无力推动创新,企业纷纷倒闭,美国梦随之破灭。特朗普总统与国务卿马尔科·鲁比奥深知事态的严重性,也证明了有比本世纪以来的种种错误做法更为明智的应对方式。
If we retreat and allow this authoritarian alliance to take hold, America will suffer. Communist China and its accomplices will starve us, isolate us, and deprive us of every resource possible until America is weak and dependent. We will have no autonomy, no opportunity, and no freedom. Our financial markets will be powerless to fuel innovation, our business will shutter, and the American Dream will die. President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio understand what’s at stake, and they’ve shown that there’s a smarter way to do it than the mistakes we’ve seen this century.
他们向全世界表明:美国绝不会屈服。特朗普总统促使北约盟友重新坚定对联盟的承诺,还鼓励其他非北约国家加入这一阵营。他们同样明白必须减少我们与敌对势力的接触,尤其是通过贸易渠道。我们每向北京及整个专制联盟输送一美元,就等于为他们提供伤害我们及盟友的资本。面对对我们实力的挑战选择退缩并不能平息他们的野心,只会让日后对抗的代价更高。
They showed the world America is not giving up. President Trump made NATO allies recommit to the alliance and have encouraged others outside the alliance to join the cause. They also understand the need to reduce our exposure to our enemies, especially via trade. Every dollar we send to Beijing — and the rest of the authoritarian alliance — is capital for them to hurt us and our allies. Retreating from the challenges to our power will not appease them; it only increases the cost of confronting them down the road.
强有力的领导力才能为国内安全与经济繁荣创造条件;缺乏这种领导力,美国及其盟友便极易沦为那些仇视我们生活方式的独裁政权的猎物。我们绝不能为了所谓“国内问题与海外事务不可兼得”的伪命题而牺牲国家与全球安全。这绝非零和博弈。
Strong leadership creates the environment for domestic security and economic prosperity. Without it, America and her allies remain vulnerable to criminal regimes who hate our way of life. We cannot sacrifice national and global security to a false dilemma of domestic versus overseas issues. It is not a zero-sum equation.
相信这种做法会毁掉美国百年来积累的辉煌成就以及美国梦本身。美国人民理应拥有一个安全、繁荣且自由的未来。而要实现这一点,美国必须发挥领导作用。里克·斯科特是佛罗里达州的资深联邦参议员,同时也是外交委员会和军事委员会的成员。丽贝卡·海因里希斯是哈德逊研究所的高级研究员,并担任该研究所“基石国防计划”的负责人。
To believe it would destroy a century of American greatness and the American Dream itself. Americans deserve a future that is safe, prosperous and free. For that to happen, America must lead. Rick Scott is Florida's senior U.S. senator. He serves on the Foreign Relations and Armed Services committees. Rebeccah Heinrichs is a senior fellow at Hudson Institute and the director of its Keystone Defense Initiative.