特朗普政府寻求重启其终止向哈佛大学发放超过20亿美元联邦拨款的努力，理由是该大学未能解决针对犹太学生的骚扰问题。
The Trump administration seeks to revive its effort to terminate over US$2 billion in federal grants to Harvard, citing the university's alleged failure to address harassment of Jewish students.
哈佛大学反对终止多元化项目以及政府对学术事务进行管控的要求，称冻结资金是违反第一修正案权利的报复行为。
Harvard opposes the demands to end diversity programmes and government control over academic matters, calling the funding freeze retaliation violating First Amendment rights.
一名联邦法官裁定，政府的行为出于意识形态动机，而司法部则辩称，大学必须处理反犹行为才能保留资金。
A federal judge ruled the administration's actions were ideologically motivated, while the Justice Department argues universities must address anti-Semitic conduct to keep funding.
人工智能生成内容：美国总统唐纳德·特朗普政府将于10月5日向上诉法院提出请求，以重启其终止向哈佛大学发放超过20亿美元（25.6亿新元）拨款的努力，这是其针对美国最富有且历史最悠久大学的广泛行动的核心部分。
AI generated US President Donald Trump’s administration will ask an appeals court on Oct 5 to revive his effort to terminate more than US$2 billion (S$2.56 billion) in grants awarded to Harvard University, a centrepiece of his broad campaign against the nation’s richest and oldest university.
定于美国东部时间上午9点30分（新加坡时间晚上9点30分）在波士顿的美国第一巡回上诉法院进行的口头辩论，将有助于决定特朗普能否利用联邦资金迫使美国大学进行变革，这位共和党总统曾表示这些大学被“激进左翼”意识形态所控制。
The oral argument before the Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals, slated for 9.30am ET (9.30pm, Singapore time), will help determine whether Trump can leverage federal funding to force change at US universities, which the Republican president has said are gripped by “radical left” ideologies.
自重返白宫以来，特朗普已通过民权调查、驱逐非公民学生、威胁撤销认证及其他手段，重塑精英和公立大学。
Trump, since returning to the White House, has used civil rights investigations, deportations of non-citizen students, accreditation threats and other tactics to reshape elite and public universities.
哈佛大学是该行动的主要目标之一，已在法庭上积极反击，并取得了多项胜利，其中包括上诉法院将于10月6日单独审查的另一项裁决，该裁决禁止政府阻止该校接待国际学生。
Harvard, a major target of that campaign, has fought back aggressively in court and has secured several victories, including another ruling the appeals court will review separately on Oct 6 that barred the administration from preventing the school from hosting international students.
特朗普政府官员于2025年4月向哈佛大学发送了一份包含10项要求的清单，其中包括终止多元化、公平和包容项目，以及任命第三方审计员监督学术部门，以确保观点的多样性。
Trump administration officials sent Harvard a list of 10 demands in April 2025, including ending diversity, equity and inclusion programmes and the appointment of third-party auditors to monitor academic departments for viewpoint diversity.
哈佛大学校长艾伦·加伯拒绝了这些要求，他说“任何政府--无论哪个政党执政--都不应该规定私立大学可以教什么、可以录取和雇用谁以及可以从事哪些研究和研究领域。”加伯发表声明后几个小时内，政府表示将冻结对该大学的联邦拨款，因为据称该大学未能解决与以色列-哈马斯冲突相关的校园抗议活动中对犹太学生的骚扰问题。它最终终止了约22亿美元的拨款。
Harvard President Alan Garber rejected the demands, saying “no government – regardless of which party is in power – should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”Within hours of Garber’s statement, the administration said it was freezing federal grants to the university because of its alleged failure to address harassment of Jewish students during campus protests related to the Israel-Hamas conflict. It ultimately terminated about US$2.2 billion in grants.
总部位于马萨诸塞州剑桥的哈佛大学提起诉讼，寻求阻止资金冻结，称这是对受宪法第一修正案保护的言论的报复。
Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Harvard filed a lawsuit seeking to block the funding freeze, calling it retaliation for speech protected by the Constitution’s First Amendment.
此案被指派给波士顿的美国地区法官艾莉森·巴勒斯，他是民主党总统巴拉克·奥巴马的任命。
The case was assigned to US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama.
在2025年一份长达84页的决定中，她表示特朗普政府利用“反犹太主义作为烟幕弹，对这个国家的一流大学进行有针对性的、出于意识形态动机的攻击”。
In an 84-page decision in 2025, she said the Trump administration used “anti-Semitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities.”
司法部向第一巡回法院提出上诉，称“政府不需要继续向那些故意漠视反犹太行为和校园歧视的大学提供纳税人的钱。”
The Justice Department appealed to the 1st Circuit, saying “the Government is not required to continue giving taxpayer dollars to universities that have demonstrated deliberate indifference to anti-Semitic conduct and discrimination on campus.”
政府还分别对哈佛大学提起了另外三起诉讼，其中包括司法部3月份提起的案件，指控哈佛大学未能保护犹太学生，违反了民权法。八月份，一名法官驳回了该诉讼，该诉讼试图收回联邦资金。
The administration has separately filed three other lawsuits against Harvard, including a case that the Justice Department launched in March alleging it violated a civil rights law by failing to protect Jewish students. A judge in August dismissed that lawsuit, which had sought to claw back federal funding.