字号·· | 护眼
semafor

民主党议员敦促白宫公开尚未公布的人工智能监管框架Democrats press White House on still-secret AI framework

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

据Semafor率先披露的信件内容,两名民主党参议员要求特朗普政府官员说明产业界对那份尚未发布的AI监管框架的影响。该框架是特朗普总统今年早些时候签署的AI行政命令的重要组成部分。

Two Democratic senators want answers from Trump administration officials on industry influence on the still-unreleased AI regulatory framework, part of the AI executive order President Donald Trump signed earlier this year, according to a letter shared first with Semafor.

马萨诸塞州民主党参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦与康涅狄格州民主党参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔在致财政部长斯科特·贝森特、白宫网络安全顾问肖恩·凯恩克罗斯及白宫幕僚长苏西·怀尔斯等人的信中写道:“我们担忧特朗普政府正迎合科技巨头高管的利益,而非应对日益复杂的AI系统所带来的安全与风险隐患。”

“We are concerned that the Trump administration is accommodating the interests of Big Tech CEOs rather than addressing the safety and security risks posed by increasingly sophisticated AI systems,” Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., wrote in the letter addressed to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House cyber adviser Sean Cairncross, and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, among others.

信件指出,有报道称产业界对最终形成的行政命令施加了影响。信中还特别提到Meta首席执行官马克·扎克伯格在促成近期白宫AI协议过程中发挥的核心作用,并批评政府与产业界高管关系过于密切且对其言听计从。这封信件再次表明,民主党人仍在持续施压,要求政府公开这一目前仍充满神秘色彩的自愿性监管框架——该框架要求AI企业向政府报备其最高级别AI模型后方可发布。一旦民主党重新掌控国会,他们的诉求将更具执行力。

The letter cites reported industry influence over what eventually became the executive order. It also highlights Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s central role in shaping the more recent White House AI accord, pointing to the administration’s “cozy relationship” with and “deference to industry executives.”The letter is the latest indication that Democrats are not giving up on a sustained push for answers from the administration on what is still a mysterious, voluntary framework for AI companies to submit their highest-level AI models to the government before release. Should the party gain power back in Congress, its demands will have more teeth.

沃伦与布卢门撒尔在信中强调:“美国民众理应享有民选官员制定的严格监管规则,而非由少数亿万富翁暗中炮制的形同虚设的框架。”两人要求政府在10月19日前答复五项具体问题。

“The American people deserve strong guardrails set by democratically elected officials, not a toothless framework shaped in secret by a handful of billionaires,” Warren and Blumenthal wrote Monday, pressing for answers to five questions by Oct. 19.

这些问题涉及6月份行政命令发布前产业界与政府官员的会晤及通信记录;是否征询了独立于产业界之外的评估机构及其他利益相关方的意见;以及该框架所规定的模型发布前测试流程的具体细节。

They asked for details on meetings and correspondence between industry and government officials leading up to the release of the executive order in June. They also want to know whether independent evaluators or other stakeholders beyond industry were consulted, and demanded a description of the pre-deployment testing process established under the framework.