Last week, journalist Rob Parker called Deion Sanders a “sellout” for taking part in an advert promoting the Protect College Sports Act (PCSA). The “sellout” label is harsh, but reflects how disappointing it is for many people to see Sanders stumping for a bill that will hurt athletes.

The major points of contention around the PCSA, which the Senate passed last week and now awaits approval from the House, are a ceiling of around $49m that schools can direct to athletes, as well as a new transfer rule that would, except in a few specific circumstances, restrict players to one “free” transfer (if they move schools again, they’d have to wait a year to play for their next team). Former NFL player Domonique Foxworth has said that “the core of [the PCSA] is about reestablishing the power the NCAA had in the past – that the court system determined was illegal”.

Sanders takes a different approach. In his pro-PCSA ad, he notes, “As a coach and father, I’m helping the next generation find their spotlight. That’s why I support the Protect College Sports Act. It gives student-athletes a chance to shine on and off the field, strengthens historically Black colleges and universities, and keeps both men’s and women’s sports strong.”That feels like a vague word salad used to shroud his true intentions.

Sanders, like PCSA booster Nick Saban and other coaches, appears to be trying to take back control from players. Student-athletes have more freedom than ever with name, image and likeness (NIL) deals and the transfer portal. In June, Sanders told reporter Baker Machado that, “I do believe that college athletes should be compensated for their name, image and likeness. But it’s not about name, image and likeness right now. It’s just about pay-per-view.”

Four years earlier, when he was coach at Jackson State, he had lamented that NIL deals turn NCAA athletes into “professionals”, saying “you don’t have staffs large enough and equipped enough to handle a young man with money.”The PCSA would not end or cap NIL, but it would mean players would have to prove the deal was worth approximately what a figure of the same standing would earn for a similar endorsement. Deals would need to be proven to have a genuine commercial purpose, something that could end deals that effectively pay students athletes to play.

Sanders’s comments echo Saban’s assertion that NIL “created an environment with no control, no guardrails”. The former Alabama coach added: “Now you’ve got transfers that are out of control. You’ve got salaries that are out of control. You’ve got budgets that are out of control.”But Saban said nothing about coaches’ salaries being out of control; he made more than $121m during his 17-year tenure at Alabama. Sanders, who earns $10m a year, is the highest-paid head coach in the Big 12.

Meanwhile Colorado’s athletic department had a $27m deficit in the last fiscal year, partly due to Sanders’s huge salary. While the PCSA has a “Lane Kiffin rule” that keeps coaches from jumping teams in the same season, there’s no cap on coaching salaries or buyouts. The players are the reason why the NCAA grosses more than $1bn in revenue a year, but this act unfairly targets athletes’ earnings potential.

It’s disappointing to see Sanders, who is idolized by Black athletes after his brilliant football career, appear to be such a hypocrite. In his 2011 NFL Hall of Fame induction speech, the former cornerback was candid about his mother’s financial woes when he was growing up. He added that his brash “Prime Time” persona came from economic necessity: “Cornerbacks, running backs, linebackers, defensive backs weren’t paid a lot. And in my dormitory room at Florida State, I created this image … You could love him or you could hate him, but he was Prime Time.”

He now laments that NIL has turned the NCAA into “a business”, but “Prime Time” was a business decision. Does he expect anyone to believe that he would have passed on an endorsement deal to support his mother when he was at college?

In May, Sanders made his intentions clear: “At Colorado … I want to win. I want to win it all. It ain’t no negotiation. No side steppin’. That’s my No 1 goal.”The NIL boom has hampered those efforts at Colorado, who lack the finances of the biggest football programs. Recruitment at Colorado, who have lost three straight games, has proved difficult for Sanders.

In April, Sports Illustrated’s Andrew Hughes wrote that, “The Buffs no longer spend enough to truly be relevant on a national scale.”Whatever Sanders’s stated reasons, the bill could also benefit him competitively. Sanders says he is pro-PCSA to “help the next generation”, but complicating NIL salaries and restricting transfers benefits him as a coach more than it helps athletes.

Sanders can accept as many transfers as he wants, but the players would no longer be able to move freely without restriction themselves. If a post-PCSA NCAA results in less player movement, and “blue blood” programs can’t just buy up every top prospect, Sanders will be able to better leverage his Hall of Fame bona fides as a recruiter, and could theoretically have more continuity on his roster. All of these developments serve his No 1 goal. But it’s a shame that he appears so focused on wins that he’d work against the very student-athlete he used to be.

At Jackson State, Sanders’s star power gave him a recruiting edge no coach could compete with. Travis Hunter, the top-ranked high school player in the country, signed with the school towards the start of Sanders’s reign. His success at Jackson State proved five-star recruits would go to HBCUs. Then, he abruptly left for the brighter lights (and bigger paycheck) of Colorado.

He could be content like other former NFL stars who have become college coaches at HBCUs. Michael Vick (Norfolk State), DeSean Jackson (Delaware State) and Marshall Faulk (Southern University) are unlikely to lead their teams to national championships, but they’re getting the chance to be mentors to young men while staying competitive in their respective conferences. It seems like that happy medium won’t satisfy Sanders, though. That’s why he left another HBCU, Jackson State, to take the Colorado job in 2023.

The chase for success has him stumping for what amounts to a federally protected salary-cap and employment framework imposed without collective bargaining. With the PCSA, a power circle of legislators, leading figures at college institutions and influential boosters would collectively roll back players’ labor rights without a single NCAA athlete having a meaningful representative role in the act’s framework. The changes will disproportionately work against Black players, who make up 66% of the football rosters at ACC, SEC and Big 12 conferences.

In a letter to Congress opposing the PCSA and opposing attacks on Black voting rights, NAACP president Derrick Johnson wrote, “Public institutions cannot depend upon Black athletes to fill their stadiums, secure television contracts, attract donations, and build nationally recognized brands, then claim neutrality when the political rights of those athletes, their families, and their communities are under attack.”Sanders is dead wrong for working against those rights.

Instead of using his voice to tell the pro-PCSA faction that the NCAA wouldn’t make a dime without its athletes and shouldn’t be trying to police their movement, he is doing their bidding. Why would he betray young Black athletes like this? Must be the glory.