Type One Energy,一家总部位于田纳西州诺克斯维尔的初创公司,该公司成立于2019年,专注于建造核聚变发电厂,周二上午宣布已从投资者那里筹集到了2亿美元。
Type One Energy, a Knoxville, Tennessee-based startup founded in 2019 to build fusion power plants, announced Tuesday morning that it has raised $200 million from investors.
这笔资金帮助这家初创公司在最具资金实力的核聚变发电公司中提升了排名。但核聚变领域是一个昂贵的研究领域。它处于等离子体物理学、材料科学和先进计算的前沿领域,即使是2亿美元也并不总是能够支撑太远。
The funding helps the startup move up the ranks of the top-funded fusion power companies. But fusion is a costly field to work in. It sits at the cutting edge of plasma physics, materials science, and advanced computation, and even $200 million doesn’t always go far.
尽管如此,Type One首席执行官克里斯托弗·毛里告诉科技评论网称,新的B轮融资应该能够帮助公司完成一座400兆瓦商用发电厂的一半资金需求。如果Type One能够在2034年前将其投入运营,他补充说,即使进行一次或多轮额外的融资,该公司也能以少于许多竞争对手的资本完成第一座发电厂。
Even so the new Series B should get the company halfway to paying for a 400-megawatt commercial power plant, Type One CEO Christofer Mowry told TechCrunch. If Type One can bring it online by 2034, he added, the company could complete its first power plant using less capital than many of its competitors, even with one or more subsequent rounds of funding.
毛里表示,其秘诀在于Type One的商业模式。他说,该公司将设计发电厂及其许多组件,然后转而依靠为该项目精心挑选的定制供应商网络来制造它们。大多数核聚变初创公司依赖供应商提供某些组件,但Type One计划走得更远。
The secret, Mowry said, is Type One’s business model. The company will design the power plant and many of its components, then turn to “bespoke” network of suppliers chosen for the project to build them, he said. Most fusion startups rely on suppliers for some components, but Type One plans to go further.
这种方式能够降低成本。毛里表示:“要在Type One实现核聚变商业化所需筹集的资本,与那些需要完全自主垂直整合的公司相比,简直是量级上的不同。”他在此提到了那些在内部自行生产大多数零部件的公司。
That approach keeps costs down. “The amount of capital that we need to raise to commercialize fusion at Type One is just a different order of magnitude than if you were going to be vertically integrated,” Mowry said, referring to companies that make most of their own parts in-house.
“我为什么要花钱买砖头和灰泥?”他补充说“我曾经经营过一家大型核制造公司。那很贵的。”这家融合初创公司已经开始组建合作伙伴名单。Type One将在田纳西河谷管理局的Bull Run工地建造其前两个聚变装置,基础设施顾问AECOM正在为最初的商业发电厂Infinity Two进行工程设计。竞争对手英联邦聚变系统公司已将其高温超导磁铁技术授权给第一型反应堆,该技术将有助于形成第一型反应堆设计的支柱。
“Why would I want to spend on bricks and mortar?” he added. “I used to run a big nuclear manufacturing company. That’s expensive.”The fusion startup has already started assembling a roster of partners. Type One will build its first two fusion devices on the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Bull Run site, and infrastructure consultant AECOM is working on engineering for Infinity Two, the initial commercial power plant. Competitor Commonwealth Fusion Systems has licensed its high-temperature superconducting magnet technology to Type One, and the technology will help form the backbone of Type One’s reactor design.
通过依赖外部供应商,第一类型成为所谓的集成商,一家用其他公司制造的零部件组装产品的公司。这最大限度地减少了制造业等活动的风险,但也带来了另一种风险。
By relying on outside suppliers, Type One becomes what’s known as an integrator, a company that assembles a product from parts made by others. That minimizes its own risk from activities like manufacturing, but it introduces a different kind of risk.
好处是可以接触到可能在某些领域拥有更多专业知识的合作伙伴,例如AECOM,致力于Infinity Two的基础设施顾问。“他们有10,000名员工,其中大多数是一类工程师。我们永远不会有10,000人,”莫里说。
The upside is access to partners that may have more expertise in certain areas, like AECOM, the infrastructure consultant working on Infinity Two. “They have 10,000 people, most of them are engineers of one kind. We’re never going to have 10,000 people,” Mowry said.
缺点是,集成商对供应商的控制权不如内部团队。最近最著名的例子可能是波音公司,该公司依靠Spirit AeroSystems为737和787客机提供机身部件。在经历了一系列质量控制失败后,包括2024年阿拉斯加航空公司航班上的门塞爆裂,波音公司收购了Spirit,并将其引入内部以提高标准。
The downside is that integrators have less control over their suppliers than an in-house team does. The most famous recent example might be Boeing, which relied on Spirit AeroSystems to supply fuselage sections for the 737 and 787 airliners. After a series of quality-control failures, including a door plug blowing out on an Alaska Airlines flight in 2024, Boeing bought Spirit, bringing it in-house to improve standards.
第一类押注它能够管理整合风险,并且它将低于内部处理一切的风险。Mowry说:“这些商业模式是成功的,因为它们让公司专注于管理风险,并在其价值链中发展高水平的能力。”
Type One is betting that it can manage the integration risk, and that it will be lower than the risk of doing everything in house. “These business models are successful because they let companies focus on managing risk and developing a high level of competency in their slice of the value chain,” Mowry said.
本轮融资由Breakthrough Energy Ventures和Clutterbuck Capital领投,Lowercarbon Capital、Siemens Energy Ventures和SiteGround Capital参与。该公司此前已筹集了至少8250万美元。
The round was led by repeat investor Breakthrough Energy Ventures and Clutterbuck Capital, with participation from Lowercarbon Capital, Siemens Energy Ventures, and SiteGround Capital. The company had previously raised at least $82.5 million.