ECI消息人士在拉胡尔·甘地抗议和指控中否认会面请求印度选举委员会内部的消息人士表示，他们尚未收到国大党或任何其他反对党的任何正式会面请求。这一事态发展发生之际，拉胡尔·甘地就与选举行为相关的指控发表声明，寻求与吉亚什·库马尔会面。虽然在一棵菩提树下的抗议活动仍在继续，但包括德里警方在内的当局正在监视局势，因为双方对所要求的会面持相互矛盾的立场。
ECI Sources Deny Meeting Request Amid Rahul Gandhi Protest and Allegations Sources within the Election Commission of India have stated that they have not received any formal request for a meeting from the Congress party or any other opposition party. This development comes amid statements from Rahul Gandhi seeking an audience with Gyanesh Kumar over allegations related to election conduct. While protests continue under a banyan tree, the authorities, including Delhi Police, monitor the situation as both sides maintain conflicting stances regarding the requested meeting.
反对派游行，拉胡尔·甘地Akashwani Bhavan Dharna和选举委员会立场反对派印度集团计划从议会向印度选举委员会办公室发起抗议游行，对德里市中心的桑萨德·玛格造成重大干扰。德里警方设置路障，阻止议员到达Nirvachan Sadan，导致包括Akhilesh Yadav、Priyanka Gandhi和Rahul Gandhi在内的几名领导人被短暂拘留。
Opposition March, Rahul Gandhi Akashwani Bhavan Dharna & Election Commission Standoff A planned protest march by the opposition INDIA bloc from Parliament towards the Election Commission of India office caused major disruptions on Sansad Marg in central Delhi. Delhi Police erected barricades to prevent the MPs from reaching Nirvachan Sadan, leading to brief detentions of several leaders, including Akhilesh Yadav, Priyanka Gandhi, and Rahul Gandhi.
示威者跳下拘留巴士，进入距离投票机构办公室约270米的Akashwani Bhavan的住所。反对派领导人在该场所无限期静坐，要求与首席选举专员直接会面，或在首都指定的替代抗议地点。示威活动持续了六个多小时，领导人坚持和平集会的宪法权利，而警方则维持第163条的限制。
Demonstrators hopped off detention buses and entered the premises of Akashwani Bhavan, located approximately 270 metres from the poll body's office. The opposition leaders settled into an indefinite sit-in on the premises, requesting either a direct meeting with the Chief Election Commissioner or an officially designated alternate protest site in the capital. The demonstration continued for over six hours, with leaders insisting on their constitutional right to peacefully assemble, while police maintained restrictions under Section 163.
德里警方拘留抗议者，拉胡尔和普里扬卡·甘地在阿卡什瓦尼·巴万高中上演戏剧，在德里市中心的议会街上演，国会工作人员和反对派领导人在向印度选举委员会举行的抗议游行中被德里警方拘留。包括阿赫莱什·亚达夫（Akhilesh Yadav）和阿布舍克·班纳吉（Abhishek Banerjee）在内的印度集团领导人在警察路障前被拦住并拘留。
Delhi Police Detains Protesters as Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi Stage Dharna at Akashvani Bhavan High drama unfolded in central Delhi on Parliament Street as Congress workers and opposition leaders were detained by the Delhi Police during a protest march towards the Election Commission of India. Leaders from the INDIA bloc, including Akhilesh Yadav and Abhishek Banerjee, were stopped at police barricades and detained.
与此同时，拉胡尔·甘地和普扬卡·甘地·瓦德拉在KC Venugopal、Deepender Hooda和Pawan Khera等高级领导人的陪同下，在Akashvani Bhavan的四号门举行了临时静坐抗议。尽管警方要求在办公时间结束后撤离公共广播公司的场所，但领导人拒绝采取行动，除非分配指定的寺庙地点或被允许向选举委员会游行。包括印度青年大会和NSUI在内的前线组织也加入了德里市中心的示威活动，导致包括快速行动部队在内的大量安全部署，以应对持续的僵局。
Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, accompanied by senior leaders such as KC Venugopal, Deepender Hooda, and Pawan Khera, staged an impromptu sit-in protest at gate number four of Akashvani Bhavan. Despite police requests to vacate the public broadcaster's premises as office hours concluded, the leaders refused to move unless allocated a designated dharna spot or permitted to march to the Election Commission. Frontal organisations, including the Indian Youth Congress and NSUI, also joined the demonstrations across central Delhi, leading to heavy security deployment, including the Rapid Action Force, to manage the continuing standoff.
六年级修改争议、选举委员会反驳和最高法院审查选举前六年级修改引发重大争议，引发反对派和执政党之间的政治对抗。反对派声称这些修改是非法的，要求取消特别密集修改工作，而执政党则坚称该表格从未修改过，并指出三位选举委员意见一致。选举委员会驳回了这些指控，称其具有误导性，并援引最高法院的一项判决维持了该命令和表格6所附的声明。与此同时，最高法院在对所谓的更改提出质疑后，已寻求相关记录来审查此事。
Row Over Form 6 Modification, Election Commission Rebuttal And Supreme Court Scrutiny A major controversy has erupted over the alleged modification of Form 6 ahead of elections, triggering a political confrontation between the opposition and the ruling party. The opposition alleges that changes were made illegally, demanding a rollback of the Special Intensive Revision exercise, while the ruling party maintains the form was never modified and points to unanimity among the three election commissioners. The Election Commission dismissed the allegations as misleading, citing a Supreme Court judgment that upheld the order and the declaration attached to Form 6. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has sought relevant records to examine the matter following pleas challenging the alleged alterations.