
参议员Thom Tillis(R-NC)正在进行媒体巡回宣传他的新书,周二早上在MS NOW摇摆不定,毫不示弱,指责唐纳德特朗普总统和他的长子在接受斯蒂芬妮·鲁尔的采访时肆意腐败。
Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), who is on a media tour promoting his new book, swung by MS NOW on Tuesday morning and pulled no punches, accusing President Donald Trump and his eldest son of wanton corruption in an interview with Stephanie Ruhle.
“你认为我们见过这种程度的腐败吗?总统和他的家人赚了数十亿美元。我的意思是,现在,特朗普米姆硬币的最大持有者,没有内在价值,价值1.04亿美元,总统正在为该硬币的最大持有者举办晚宴,“鲁尔问道。
“Do you think we have ever seen this level of corruption, with the billions of dollars the president and his family are making? I mean, right now, the largest holder of the Trump meme coin, which has no intrinsic value, has $104 million worth of it, and the president is hosting a dinner for the largest holders of that coin,” Ruhle asked.
“看,有区别。在Price Waterhouse,作为经理和合伙人,他们很早就教会了我们一件事,那就是你弄清楚界限在哪里,然后你后退一步。你不会在灰色地带导航,在我看来,有些人确实在灰色地带导航,”蒂利斯回答道,并补充道:是否违法还有待观察。如果众议院翻转,明年可能会成为调查的对象,这是恰当的。我有一个真正的--所以你有那块。
“Look, there’s a difference. At Price Waterhouse, one thing they taught us early as a manager and a partner is that you figure out where the line is, and you take a step back. You don’t navigate the gray, and it does appear to me that some folks are navigating the gray,” Tillis replied, adding: Whether or not it’s illegal remains to be seen. It will probably be the subject of an investigation next year if the House flips, appropriately so. I have a real — so you have that piece.
希望总统有好的顾问。他们没有违法,但外表并不好。每当一位总统在人们在拖车公园长大的同一年赚了10亿美元时,鲁尔补充道,“远远超过10亿美元。”
Hopefully the president has good advisors. They haven’t run afoul of the law, but appearances are not good. Anytime a president makes a billion dollars in the same year that people are growing up in a trailer park–Ruhle added, “Way more than a billion.”
“我是在那里长大的,你知道,这看起来很糟糕,我认为这就是我们面临政治阻力的原因之一。我遇到的最大问题是小唐。听着,我意识到即使是身价3亿或4亿美元的人也可能会遇到流动性问题,但你可能会认为他会想出另一种方法,而不是让一位俄罗斯寡头(实际上与弗拉基米尔·普京一起前往北京执行任务)资助婚礼。没有意义,”蒂利斯说完,补充道:再说一遍,这是否违法?我不知道,但外表,这是我们最不需要的。这是关于共和党品牌的。
“That I grew up in, you know, it’s a bad look, and I think that’s one of the reasons why we have political headwinds. The big issue I have is with Don Jr. Look, I realize even people worth $300 or $400 million can have liquidity problems, but you’d have thought he’d have figured out another way other than letting a Russian oligarch, who has literally been on a mission with Vladimir Putin to Beijing, fund a wedding. Doesn’t make sense,” Tillis finished, adding: Again, is it illegal? I don’t know, but appearances, it’s the last thing we need. This is about the Republican brand.
鲁尔接着说道:“但这就是它确实有意义的地方,好吗?这是有道理的,因为它让我们问一个问题:这座白宫待售吗?为什么俄罗斯寡头要为小唐买单?除非他得到了认真的政治恩惠,否则他的婚礼?”
Ruhle followed up, “But here’s where it does make sense, OK? It makes sense because it makes us ask the question: Is this White House for sale? Why would a Russian oligarch want to pay for Don Jr.’s wedding unless he was getting serious political favors?”
蒂利斯表示同意:“我认为这些都是合理的问题。他们应该得到答案。我写这本书的观点,以及我在这些节目中谈论的观点,都是我关心共和党品牌。”
Tillis agreed, “I think those are legitimate questions. They should be answered. My point in writing the book, and my point in talking on these shows, is that I care about the Republican brand.”
“我关心保守主义。我相信这个国家,我知道我的州,因为我们在过去20年里根据经验衡量了它,当共和党掌权时,我的州会得到更好的照顾。现在,我们正在制造非受迫性错误,我们正在创造一个28天后的环境,这可能会让我们至少在一个会议室失去权力,”蒂利斯继续说道,并补充道:更不用说一些立法机构可能面临风险的州了。
“I care about conservatism. I believe this country, and I know that my state, because we’ve empirically measured it over the last 20 years, is in better hands when Republicans are in charge. Right now, we are creating unforced errors, and we’re creating an environment 28 days from now that could take us out of power in at least one chamber,” Tillis continued, adding: Not to mention some of the states that may be at risk for legislatures.
所以就像,天哪,让我们承认这些都是合法的问题,然后继续前进。停止这里没有什么可看的东西,只是说,“是的,我们会看看它,如果他们有一个好的案例,那就提出它”,并说这一切都是光明正大的。
So it’s like, gosh, let’s just admit these are legitimate questions and move on. Stop the nothing-to-see-here stuff, and just say, “Yes, we’ll look at it, and if they’ve got a good case, then present it,” and say all of this was above board.
人们可能不喜欢这个外观,但没有什么违法的。我对此没有问题。我现在遇到的问题是选举日之前的一种趋势,我正在尽最大努力确保共和党人、软弱的共和党人和中右翼无党派人士出去投票。
People may not like the look, but there was nothing illegal. I’ve got no problem with that. What I’ve got a problem with right now is a trend leading up to Election Day, and I’m doing my best to make sure that Republicans, soft Republicans, and right-of-center unaffiliateds get out and vote.
因为他们根本不知道如果我们失去国会会带来什么后果。这是一个由民主党领导的国会,他们在拜登的压力下投票否决了阻挠议事的决定。我一直反对特朗普总统试图用核武器压制阻挠议事。
Because they have no earthly idea what the consequences will be if we lose Congress. This is a Congress that was led by Democrats that voted to nuke the filibuster under Biden’s pressure. I have stood against President Trump’s trying to nuke the filibuster.
我担心,如果我的民主党同事控制了参议院,他们是否会加倍努力并摧毁参议院的机构,这就是我试图向28天后将下台的选民传达的信息。
新的:
I’m worried about whether or not my Democratic colleagues are going to double down and destroy the institution of the Senate if they get in control, and that’s what I’m trying to communicate to the voters who are going to be out in 28 days.