字号·· | 护眼
半岛电视台

为什么派拉蒙与华纳的合并引发了对新闻自由的担忧Why Paramount-Warner merger has sparked fears about press freedom

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

一名记者在克莱门茨娱乐中心外的运动场上,CNN标志附近录制视频。[文件:美联社照片/约翰·明奇洛]A journalist records video near a CNN sign on an athletic field outside the Clements Recreation Center. [File: AP Photo/John Minchillo]

派拉蒙天舞公司已完成对华纳兄弟探索集团的收购,此举使得CNN与CBS新闻隶属于同一企业旗下。然而,这桩交易也引发了外界对于媒体编辑独立性及言论自由前景的担忧。

Paramount Skydance has completed its takeover of Warner Bros Discovery, bringing CNN and CBS News under the same corporate ownership, in a deal that has raised concerns about editorial independence and freedom of speech.

这笔交易的总价值约为1100亿美元(含债务),历经数月的法律纷争后,终于促成了好莱坞两大影视巨头的强强联合。这些法律纷争由各州总检察长及工会发起。

The acquisition, worth about $110bn including debt, combines two of Hollywood’s biggest studios after months of legal challenges lodged by state attorneys general and unions.

新成立的“天舞集团”旗下汇集了HBO、CBS、尼克国际儿童频道、Showtime、喜剧中心、DC影业以及美食频道,同时还包括流媒体平台派拉蒙+与HBO Max。

The new company, Skydance Corporation, brings together HBO, CBS, Nickelodeon, Showtime, Comedy Central, DC Studios and Food Network, alongside streaming services Paramount plus and HBO Max.

不过,该集团对两家美国主流新闻机构的掌控引发了特别关注。天舞集团董事长兼首席执行官大卫·埃里森承诺会维护这些媒体的编辑独立性;然而他的父亲、甲骨文公司联合创始人拉里·埃里森则是该交易的重要资金支持者,且此前曾向美国总统唐纳德·特朗普及以色列提供捐款。

But its control of two major US news organisations has drawn particular scrutiny. David Ellison, Skydance’s chairman and chief executive, has promised to preserve their editorial independence, but his father, Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison is a major financial backer of the deal, and has previously donated funds to US President Donald Trump and Israel.

周二,当被问及此次收购时,特朗普予以了肯定:“他们都是很出色的人,新公司也定会大获成功。”为何这桩并购会引发争议?

Asked about the takeover on Tuesday, Trump welcomed it. “They’re terrific people, and it’s going to be a great company,” he said. Why was the merger challenged?

起初,好莱坞从业者、政界人士以及各州检察官均对此次收购持反对态度。他们担忧的是:在原本就由少数几家企业主导的影视行业中,权力集中度还将进一步上升。

The takeover faced initial opposition from Hollywood workers, politicians and state prosecutors concerned about the mounting concentration of power in an industry already dominated by a handful of companies.

最初,网飞曾与华纳兄弟探索集团达成协议拟收购其部分业务。随后派拉蒙发起竞争性收购要约,引发了激烈的竞价战;最终网飞选择退出。

Netflix initially reached an agreement to buy part of Warner Bros Discovery. Paramount then launched a competing bid, prompting a bidding war before Netflix walked away.

由加利福尼亚州牵头、12个州的检察长组成的联盟提起诉讼,试图阻止该交易,理由是此举会削弱市场竞争并导致价格上涨。美国编剧协会也提出了独立的法律异议。

A California-led coalition of 12 state attorneys general sued to block the deal, saying that it would reduce competition and raise prices. The Writers Guild of America brought a separate challenge.

今年9月,派拉蒙同意履行多项承诺,包括保障影视制作活动、为失业从业者提供援助以及切实维护旗下新闻媒体的编辑独立性(例如设立专门的编辑独立委员会),相关诉讼才得以和解。

Both cases were settled in September when Paramount agreed to commitments relating to film production, support for displaced workers and protections for the news networks, including the creation of a new editorial independence board.

不过,这项和解协议并未平息对这笔交易的反对声音。“这次并购会扼杀创造力、削弱言论自由,还会导致大量人员失业,”演员兼社会活动家马克·鲁法洛说道。

But the settlement did not end opposition to the deal. “This merger will stifle creativity, weaken free speech and cost people their jobs,” actor and activist Mark Ruffalo has said.

民主党参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦则将此次收购与特朗普限制媒体准入的举措联系起来。“就在特朗普试图禁止CNN进入白宫之际,若在派拉蒙并购案上让步将是极其严重的错误,”她说道。此前,特朗普曾试图禁止包括CNN在内的多家新闻机构的记者进入白宫,但该企图最终未能得逞。一个编辑独立性委员会能否保护CNN与CBS?

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren linked the takeover to Trump’s efforts to restrict media access. “As Trump tries to ban CNN from the White House, it would be a massive mistake to cave on the Paramount merger,” she said, referring to the US president’s so-far thwarted attempt last month to bar reporters from several news organisations including CNN, from accessing the White House. Can an editorial independence board protect CNN and CBS?

和解协议的一项条件要求斯凯丹斯在完成收购后的180天内设立“新闻编辑独立性委员会”。

One condition of the settlement requires Skydance to establish a “News Editorial Independence Board” within 180 days of completing the takeover.

该委员会由五名成员组成,均为拥有至少10年从业经验的现任或退休记者。其职责是制定编辑准则,并处理新闻网络与企业管理层之间的争议。

The five-member body is to include active or retired journalists with at least 10 years of experience. It is intended to establish editorial principles and address disputes involving the news networks and corporate management.

然而,委员会成员由埃里森担任主席的斯凯丹斯董事会任命并向其汇报。委员会中最多可有两名成员属于同一政党,且并无强制要求公开其审议结果。

However, its members will be appointed by, and will report to, Skydance’s board of directors, which Ellison chairs. Two members can belong to the same political party, and there is no requirement to publish its findings.

这一条款引发了诸多批评声音,人们纷纷提出疑问:身为独立编辑委员会成员的人怎么还能加入某个政党?若审议结果不对外公开,又如何实现有效监督?该委员会由公司首席执行官任命的董事会来选定成员,又怎能称得上独立呢?

The condition has left critics with a multitude of questions, including: How can a member of an independent editorial board be a member of a political party? How can there be scrutiny if its findings are not public? How can it be independent if it is appointed by a board of directors, themselves appointed by the CEO of the company?

新闻自由基金会倡导事务负责人塞斯·斯特恩表示:“派拉蒙为CNN和CBS设立的编辑独立性委员会毫无用处。上梁不正下梁歪,而这个委员会的负责人正是一个为谋取商业利益不惜牺牲记者利益的寡头。”

Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, said, “A Paramount-appointed editorial independence board for CNN and CBS is worthless. The fish rots from the head, and this particular fish is headed by a compromised oligarch with a history of throwing journalists under the bus to advance his business interests.”

斯特恩还质疑,政府对和解协议的强制执行本身是否会威胁到新闻自由。“这个编辑委员会反而引发了它本应解决的《第一修正案》相关问题——即政府干预新闻报道。”根据《第一修正案》,言论自由与新闻自由均受宪法保护。

Stern also questioned whether government enforcement of the settlement could itself threaten press freedom. “The editorial board creates the same First Amendment problems it’s supposed to solve – the government meddling in the news.”The First Amendment provides constitutional protection for freedom of speech and the press.

埃里森则坚称这两家媒体仍将保持独立运营。“我们将确保CNN与CBS新闻在编辑事务上完全独立,”他在周二说道。

Ellison argues that the two networks will continue to operate independently. “We’re going to make sure that CNN and CBS News are completely editorially independent,” he said on Tuesday.

周一,斯凯丹斯公司宣布马克·汤普森将继续担任CNN董事长兼总编辑,巴里·韦斯也仍将执掌CBS新闻。这一安排打消了此前外界对于韦斯会立即掌控两家媒体的担忧。为何会出现对编辑独立性的担忧?

On Monday, Skydance announced that Mark Thompson would remain CNN’s chairman and editor-in-chief, while Bari Weiss will continue as CBS News’s editor-in-chief, easing previous fears that Weiss would immediately take charge of both networks. Why are there fears for editorial independence?

此次收购使得埃里森家族在11月3日美国中期选举前不到一个月的时间里便掌控了CNN。此前,特朗普曾多次抨击该媒体,而后者则始终致力于监督这位美国总统的行为。

The takeover gives the Ellison family control of CNN less than a month before the November 3 US midterm elections, and follows Trump’s repeated attacks on the network as it seeks to hold the US president to account.

去年12月派拉蒙启动收购计划后不久,特朗普便指责CNN散布“有害言论与谎言”,并称将其出售“势在必行”。与此同时,特朗普政府还采取措施禁止CNN在白宫某些区域进行报道。

Shortly after Paramount launched its bid in December, Trump accused CNN of spreading “poison and lies” and said it was “imperative” that it be sold, while the Trump administration has moved to bar CNN from reporting in certain areas of the White House.

据悉,埃里森曾向一家支持特朗普2024年竞选的政治非营利组织捐赠约4500万美元;此外他还向支持以色列士兵的慈善机构“以色列国防军之友”捐出1660万美元——这也是该机构当时收到的最大一笔单笔捐款。

Ellison donated roughly $45m to a political nonprofit group supporting Trump’s election efforts in 2024, while he donated $16.6m to Friends of the Israel Defense Forces, a charity supporting Israeli soldiers – its largest single donation at the time.

今年早些时候,白宫曾批评CNN对美国与以色列对伊朗开战的报道方式。国防部长皮特·赫格塞斯也对记者表示:“大卫·埃里森越早接管这家媒体公司越好。”沙特阿拉伯、卡塔尔和阿联酋的主权财富基金也在这家合并后的公司中拥有间接经济利益。虽然这些基金并不持有投票权,但它们的参与仍使得该公司的资金来源受到更多审视。

Earlier this year, the White House criticised CNN’s coverage of the US-Israeli war on Iran, while Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters that “the sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better.”Sovereign wealth funds from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates also hold indirect financial interests in the combined company. They have no voting stakes, although their involvement adds another layer of scrutiny over its funding.

然而,2025年天舞影业收购派拉蒙之后,人们对媒体编辑独立性的担忧进一步加剧:大量员工被解雇,CBS新闻广播频道关闭,《60分钟》这一CBS新闻的王牌调查类节目也发生了诸多变动。

Concerns about the future for editorial integrity, however, intensified after Skydance acquired Paramount in 2025, and layoffs followed, alongside the closure of CBS News Radio and changes to CBS News flagship investigative programme 60 Minutes.

在CBS新闻总编辑巴里·韦斯以及天舞影业首席执行官大卫·埃里森的主导下,多名知名记者遭到解雇,其中包括记者莎琳·阿尔方西与塞西莉亚·维加,以及《60分钟》的执行制片人塔尼娅·西蒙。

High-profile firings enacted under CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss and Skydance Media CEO David Ellison included correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega, as well as 60 Minutes executive producer Tanya Simon.

今年9月,《60分钟》新一季首播时的观众人数较去年同期减少了约21%。

The programme’s September season premiere attracted about 21 percent fewer viewers than a year earlier.

同年,派拉蒙还同意向特朗普支付1600万美元,以了结一起关于《60分钟》对时任总统候选人卡玛拉·哈里斯的采访内容被篡改的诉讼。

In 2025, Paramount also agreed to pay Trump $16m to settle a lawsuit over the editing of a 60 Minutes interview with then-presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

在6月2日发出的一封信中,包括“无国界记者”、新闻自由基金会以及第一修正案委员会在内的九个倡导组织警告称,CNN也可能面临类似的动荡与大规模裁员。

In a June 2 letter, nine advocacy groups, including Reporters Without Borders, the Freedom of the Press Foundation and the Committee for the First Amendment, warned that CNN could face similar upheaval and firings.

这些组织指出:“巴里·韦斯毫无廉耻的所作所为,正是埃里森家族对特朗普总统‘按其意愿改造CBS’承诺的具体体现。”信中还提到,《60分钟》节目出现的种种变动正是这一承诺的体现。

“Bari Weiss’ shameless actions fulfil the Ellisons’ commitment to President Trump to remake CBS to his liking,” they alleged, referring to the firings and changes at 60 Minutes. “Larry Ellison has reportedly promised to do the same at CNN if allowed to take control through the pending Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger. Not because it makes any business sense, but because they seek to control the public discourse.”

“据报道,拉里·埃里森也承诺:只要能通过即将进行的派拉蒙与华纳兄弟探索公司的合并案掌控CNN,他也会如法炮制。这么做并非出于商业考量,而是为了控制公众舆论。”这些组织将此次收购计划形容为“对本国乃至全球的新闻自由、独立媒体与言论自由的重大生存威胁”。

The groups described the proposed takeover as an “existential threat to the free press, independent media, and free speech in this country and beyond”.