
一场旨在针对广告经理的网络钓鱼活动通过冒充 Gemini、Claude、ChatGPT、Perplexity 和 Manus 来窃取凭证和多因素认证(MFA)代码,在其诱饵阵容中新增了一款假的 Muse Ads 产品——就在 Meta 推出其个人 AI 代理仅仅八天之后。
A phishing campaign targeting advertising managers by impersonating Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Manus to steal credentials and multi-factor authentication (MFA) codes has added a fake Muse Ads product to its lure lineup – just eight days after Meta launched its personal AI agent.
Meta 于 9 月 8 日宣布推出 Muse,到 9 月 17 日,一个针对名为 Muse Ads 的产品的、极具说服力的网站(museads.ai)便在网上出现,该产品承诺帮助广告商接触买家并运营赞成投放。“运营者已经拥有了这个平台,因此将其适配到一个新品牌只需几分钟,”Island 的首席安全研究员奥列格·扎伊采夫(Oleg Zaytsev)对 The 表示。
Meta announced Muse on September 8, and by September 17, a very convincing website – museads.ai – for a product called Muse Ads that promised to help advertisers reach buyers and run sponsored placements popped up online. “The operators already had the platform, so adapting it to a new brand can take minutes,” Oleg Zaytsev, lead security researcher at Island, told The.
“最引人注目的是,他们以多快的速度将一个及时的公告变成了一个让人采取行动的可信理由。然后,同一个平台可以围绕其他熟悉任务进行重新包装,从连接商业工具到申请退款或应聘工作。”
“The striking part is how quickly they turned a timely announcement into a credible reason for someone to act. The same platform could then be repackaged around other familiar tasks, from connecting a business tool to claiming a refund or applying for a job.”
这家安全初创公司发现了 Muse Ads 网页,在深入调查该骗局后发现,只有这个页面是新的。“它的代码,从登录表单到假冒浏览器窗口,都来自于一个更大规模的行动,该行动此前已经针对 Gemini、Claude、ChatGPT、Perplexity 和 Manus 运行过虚假广告产品,”扎伊采夫和 Island 的另一位研究员奥费克·罗嫩(Ofek Ronen)在周二发布的一篇博客文章中写道。
The security startup spotted the Muse Ads webpage, and upon digging into the scam uncovered that just the page was new. “Its code, from the sign-in forms to the fake browser window, came from a wider operation that had already run fake ad products for Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Manus,” Zaytsev and fellow Island researcher Ofek Ronen wrote in a blog post published Tuesday.
所有这些产品都被用作浏览器内浏览器(BitB)攻击的诱饵,旨在诱骗广告公司员工、媒体买家和经理账户管理员交出其广告账户凭证——以及存储的支付方式和客户账户——给数字窃贼。“对于受害者而言,潜在的代价是失去对广告账户的访问权限、未授权的广告支出以及关联客户账户的暴露,”扎伊采夫对 The 表示。该骗局的运作方式BitB 是一种巧妙的网络钓鱼技术,最初由一位名为 mr.d0x 的研究员于 2022 年详细阐述。它涉及直接在合法窗口内部构建一个假窗口。
All of these products served as lures for browser-in-the-browner (BitB) attacks designed to trick agency staff, media buyers, and manager-account administrators into handing over their advertising account credentials – along with stored payment methods and client accounts – to digital thieves. “For victims, the potential cost is loss of access to an advertising account, unauthorized ad spend, and exposure of linked client accounts,” Zaytsev told The. How the scam works BitB is a clever phishing technique originally detailed by a researcher called mr.d0x in 2022. It involves building a fake window directly inside a legitimate one.
这个虚假窗口看起来和真实窗口一模一样,包含地址栏、标题和URL,但实际上它只是一个覆盖层,用于窃取用户的认证信息。据Zaytsev称,这一工具很可能为其犯罪运营者带来了丰厚的收益,已有数百名受害者向该平台提交信息,且相关活动仍在继续。“仅从一个前端界面来看,我们在大约一个月的时间里就观察到涉及约200个不同电子邮件地址的提交记录,”他告诉我们,“运营者在同一平台上使用了多个类似网站,因此我们估计整个活动的总规模要大得多。”
The fake window looks like the real thing, featuring an address bar, title, and URL, but it's just an overlay to steal users’ credentials. According to Zaytsev, this one has likely proved very lucrative for its criminal operators, with hundreds of victim submissions to the platform, and activity still ongoing. “From one frontend alone, we observed submissions involving roughly 200 distinct email addresses over about a month,” he told us. “The operators used the same platform across many similar sites, so we estimate the campaign-wide volume is substantially higher.”
每个虚假广告产品都有自己的页面:ChatGPT向用户承诺提供周一的Google广告简报,Gemini提供经理账户和关联客户支持,Claude提供广告门户,Perplexity主打活动规划和支出审计,而Manus则提供私有的Meta集成功能。每个虚假产品页面都设有一个“连接”按钮。当受害者点击“连接”时,浏览器内会打开一个覆盖层,其虚假地址栏显示为accounts.google.com或Okta租户,以骗取受害者的信任。
Each phony ad product has its own page, with ChatGPT promising users a Monday Google Ads brief, Gemini offering manager account and linked-client support, Claude an advertising portal, Perplexity pitching campaign planning and spend audits, and Manus providing a private Meta integration. Each fake product page also has a “connect” button. When the victim clicks “connect,” it opens the browser-in-browser overlay, with a fake address bar showing accounts.google.com, or an Okta tenant to gain the victim’s trust.
然而,真实的浏览器仍停留在钓鱼域名上,并在受害者输入信息时窃取其认证数据。负责该活动的人工运营者会看到每一次提交,并决定受害者接下来看到的内容以及需要执行的操作。这些操作包括要求输入另一个密码、请求短信或Okta验证器代码以绕过多因素认证(MFA)、显示Google授权码或Okta推送请求,或者展示二维码。
The real browser, however, stays on the phishing domain and steals credentials when the victim types them in. A human operator running the campaign sees each submission and chooses what the victim sees and is prompted to do. This includes asking for another password, requesting an SMS or Okta authenticator code to bypass MFA, showing a Google approval code or Okta push request, or displaying a QR code.
该平台支持Google、Meta、TikTok和Okta的工作流程,浏览器覆盖层也能适应受害者使用的各种系统:Windows、macOS、iOS或Android,甚至能模仿Safari的URL药丸、Chrome的自定义标签页以及深色模式。尽管研究人员表示尚未识别出该工具的操作者,也未找到其销售名称,但运营者因配置不当的公开GitHub仓库而暴露了旧版源代码,从而将此次行动与一个更庞大的运营网络关联起来。
The platform supports Google, Meta, TikTok, and Okta workflows, and the browser overlay adapts to whatever the victim runs: Window, macOS, iOS, ot Android, and even mimics Safari’s URL pill, Chrome’s custom tabs, and a dark mode. And while the researchers told us they haven’t identified the people operating the kit or found a name under which it’s sold, the operators did expose older source code through misconfigured public GitHub repositories that connected this to a campaign to a larger operation.
除了AI广告页面外,此次行动还利用虚假退款索赔和招聘网站作为诱饵,并为阿迪达斯(Adidas)、谷歌招聘(Google Careers)、Robert Half、特斯拉(Tesla)和路易威登(Louis Vuitton)分别搭建了独立页面。所有这些页面均运行在同一个Next.js和Socket.IO架构之上。许多页面还使用了Vercel前端,并通过Railway或Render服务在后台处理状态和命令。
In addition to the AI ad pages, this operation also used fake refund claims and job recruitment sites as lures with separate builds for Adidas, Google Careers, Robert Half, Tesla, and Louis Vuitton. All of these pages run on one Next.js and Socket.IO stack. Many of the pages also used Vercel frontends with Railway or Render services behind them for state and commands.
Zaytsev表示:“一个新品牌或设计精美的页面并不一定意味着一次新的攻击。攻击者可以迅速更换诱饵,但工作流程仍需将用户引导至他们控制的网站、收集凭证,并引导其完成身份验证。”他补充道:“安全团队应持续维护一个可信域名的基准列表,检查浏览器的真实地址,并关联不同网站上的相似行为。攻击者可以迅速生成一个极具说服力的网站,但要构建一个合法服务应有的域名历史和声誉则要困难得多。AI可以帮助防御方跟上由AI生成的网站的发展步伐,尤其是当这些网站变得越来越逼真且出现速度越来越快时。” ®
“A new brand or polished page doesn’t necessarily mean a new attack. Operators can change the lure quickly, but the workflow still has to move someone onto a site they control, collect credentials, and steer them through authentication,” Zaytsev said. “Security teams should maintain a continuous baseline of trusted domains, check the real browser address, and connect similar behavior across different sites,” he added. “Attackers can generate a convincing website quickly; building the domain history and reputation of a legitimate service is much harder. AI can help defenders keep pace with AI-generated websites, especially as they become more convincing and appear more quickly.”. ®