字号·· | 护眼
卫报

“现实版《城堡》时刻”:退休的澳大利亚夫妇单挑煤炭巨头并获胜‘A real-life moment from The Castle’: the retired Australian couple who took on a coal giant and won

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

“如果有人要挑战这件事,那一定就是我们……”温迪·威尔士和托尼·洛纳根在新南威尔士州上亨特谷的自家地产上。摄影:Zoe Lonergan/气候媒体中心‘If anyone was going to take it on, it was going to be us’ … Wendy Wales and Tony Lonergan on their property in the NSW Upper Hunter Valley. Photograph: Zoe Lonergan/Climate Media Centre

温迪·威尔士(Wendy Wales)和托尼·罗纳根(Tony Lonergan)为反对MACH Energy公司旗下的芒特普莱森特(Mount Pleasant)煤矿而进行了长达四年的斗争,这场官司一直打到了高等法院。当时,温迪、托尼以及新南威尔士州亨特地区的几位邻居决定对抗当地一家煤矿的扩建计划时,人们都认为他们卷入这场“大卫对阵歌利亚”的较量是“疯了”。

Wendy Wales and Tony Lonergan’s four-year fight over MACH Energy’s Mount Pleasant coalmine went all the way to the high court When Wendy Wales and Tony Lonergan and a few of their neighbours in the New South Wales Hunter region decided to take on the expansion of a local coalmine, people thought they were “crazy” to engage in the David and Goliath battle.

“得到了证明……”威尔士与洛纳根(右)及他们的律师(左)一同向媒体发表讲话。摄影:Dan Himbrechts/AAP‘Vindicated’ … Wales speaks to the media with Lonergan (at right) and their lawyers (left). Photograph: Dan Himbrechts/AAP

“当我们开始做这件事时,人们觉得我们疯了——一个小型社区团体去对抗一家价值数十亿美元的煤炭公司,辩称燃烧这些煤炭带来的气候危害也是我们自己的问题,”威尔士说。

“When we started this, people thought we were crazy – a little community group taking on a billion-dollar coal company, arguing that the climate harm from burning this coal is our problem too,” Wales says.

“这是一项非常重要的判决……”律师伊莱恩·约翰逊在威尔士一家赢得高等法院诉讼后与她合影。摄影:Dan Himbrechts/AAP‘This is a very significant judgment’ … lawyer Elaine Johnson with Wales after their win in the high court. Photograph: Dan Himbrechts/AAP
登曼·阿伯丁·马斯韦尔布鲁克·斯康健康环境小组(Dams Heg)的支持者们庆祝高等法院的裁决。摄影:Dan Himbrechts/AAPSupporters of the Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group (Dams Heg) celebrate the high court ruling. Photograph: Dan Himbrechts/AAP

注册即可免费订阅气候与环境编辑亚当·莫顿(Adam Morton)的“清浩空气”(Clear Air)专栏通讯。

Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as a free newsletter