印度在联合国行使了“答辩权”，就克什米尔和安全问题驳斥了巴基斯坦。这一回应重申了新德里在恐怖主义、威慑和国家问责问题上的立场。
India used its Right of Reply at the UN to rebut Pakistan on Kashmir and security. The response underscored New Delhi's stance on terrorism, deterrence and state accountability.
周五，印度在联合国大会第一委员会行使了“答辩权”，对巴基斯坦提出批评，称核武器绝不应被视为“国家政策的常规工具”，并强调新德里“不会屈服”于核讹诈。此前，巴基斯坦在关于裁军与国际安全的全委会会议上提及了查谟和克什米尔问题。印度表示，其军事能力具有防御性质，并由其安全环境所决定。
India on Friday used its Right of Reply at the UN General Assembly's First Committee to hit out at Pakistan, saying nuclear weapons must not be treated as "routine instruments of statecraft" and asserting that New Delhi will "not bow" to nuclear blackmail. Responding after Pakistan raised Jammu and Kashmir during the plenary meeting on Disarmament and International Security, India said its capabilities are defensive and shaped by its security environment.
印度常驻日内瓦裁军会议代表团高级顾问（裁军事务）安莫尔·谢尔·辛格·贝迪在阐述印度的回应时指出，查谟和克什米尔是印度不可分割且不可转让的一部分。他还表示，印度不寻求冲突，但警告称，对鲁莽行为缺乏问责机制持续加剧了该地区的危机。
Delivering India's response, Anmol Sher Singh Bedi, Senior Adviser (Disarmament) at the Permanent Mission of India to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, said Jammu and Kashmir is an integral and inalienable part of India. He also said India does not seek conflict, but warned that a lack of accountability for reckless actions keeps fuelling crises in the region. "We call for India's illegally occupied territories to be vacated and returned," Bedi said. "India has always stood for peace and continues to seek peace with one and with all.
贝迪说：“我们呼吁印度立即撤离并归还其非法占领的领土。印度始终致力于和平，并继续与各方寻求和平。然而，如果对鲁莽行为缺乏问责，和平往往只是危机之间的短暂停歇。”
However, if there is no accountability for reckless actions, then peace rarely becomes a pause between crises," he said. He said India's capabilities are "defensive in nature" and are not directed against any state. "We heard concerns about escalation.
他表示，印度的军事能力“本质上是防御性的”，并不针对任何国家。“我们听到了有关局势升级的担忧，这些担忧是合理的。然而，最准确的判断应基于长期的行为表现。核武器绝不应被视为国家政策的常规工具。”贝迪补充道，“依赖核威慑来限制非传统冲突后果的做法，只会增加局势升级的风险，而非带来克制的可能性。”
These are legitimate concerns. However, these are best judged by conduct over time. Nuclear weapons must not be treated as routine instruments of statecraft," he said. "A posture that relies on nuclear overhang to limit the consequences of subconventional activity raises the risk of escalation and not the prospect of restraint," Bedi added. Referring to Pakistan's approach, Bedi said crises in the region have often followed a "recurring pattern: first, provocation; second, denial of responsibility; and third, appeals for restraint once a response has been made".
提及巴基斯坦的做法时，贝迪表示，该地区的危机往往遵循一种“反复出现的模式：第一，挑衅；第二，否认责任；第三，在做出回应后呼吁克制”。他补充道：“当掌权者既非由人民选举产生，也不对人民负责时，他们的决策对决策者而言不承担任何风险，也不付出任何代价。这就是危机如何成为权力工具，这就是动荡如何变得有用，也是这种循环为何不断重演的原因。”
He added, "Where those in power are neither elected by people nor accountable to them, their decisions carry no risk and impose no cost for those who take them. That is how crisis becomes an instrument of power. That is how instability becomes useful, and that is how the cycle keeps on repeating." "The use of force by states under the garb of non-state actors does not erase the state's responsibility. India's right of self-defence remains intact," he said.
“‘国家以非国家行为体为幌子使用武力，并不能免除国家的责任。印度的自卫权依然完整，’他说。贝迪表示，印度已划定三条明确红线：‘第一，任何针对印度的恐怖袭击都将遭到相应回击。第二，印度不会向核讹诈低头。第三，印度不会在恐怖主义资助者和策划者之间做任何区分。’他告诉委员会，印度去年5月的行动是在帕哈尔加姆恐袭造成26名平民死亡这一‘严重挑衅’之后采取的。‘这些行动是有分寸的、精准的，且旨在不升级事态，’他说。”
Bedi said India has drawn three clear lines: "First, any terrorist attack against India will receive a fitting response. Second, India will not bow to nuclear blackmail. Third, India will make no distinction between those who sponsor terrorism and those who mastermind it."
去年5月，印度发动“辛杜尔行动”，打击巴基斯坦和巴基斯坦占领克什米尔地区的恐怖基础设施，以报复4月22日发生在查谟-克什米尔帕哈尔加姆的袭击。该袭击由“抵抗阵线”实施，该组织是总部设在巴基斯坦的“虔诚军”的代理人，造成26名平民死亡，其中大多数为游客。
He told the committee that India's actions in May last year followed a "grave provocation" after the Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 civilians were killed. "These actions were measured, targeted, and designed to be non-escalatory," he said. In May last year, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the April 22 attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir, which was carried out by The Resistance Front, a proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, and killed 26 civilians, most of them tourists.
关于《印度河水条约》，贝迪表示，该协议签署时建立在诚信和善意的基础上。他说：“一个国家不能破坏信任与合作的这些基础，同时又坚持要求从该关系中衍生的特权保持不受影响。”在巴哈尔加姆袭击事件发生后，印度表示，该条约将被暂停，直到巴基斯坦可信且不可逆转地结束其对跨境恐怖主义和其他形式恐怖主义的支持。
On the Indus Waters Treaty, Bedi said the agreement rested on good faith and goodwill when it was signed. "A state cannot undermine those foundations of trust and cooperation and at the same time insist that the privileges flowing from the relationship remain untouched," he said. After the Pahalgam attack, India said the treaty would be held in abeyance until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably ends its support for cross-border terrorism and other forms of terrorism.
在扩散问题上，贝迪提到了A·Q·汗网络的历史，称其促成了近二十年前安理会第1540号决议的通过。他表示，在要求无条件核合作和转让先进武器及军事能力的呼声中，这仍然具有现实意义。他说：“我们敦促所有国家和所有负责任的供应商保持最高度的警惕，不是因为印度，而是为了他们自身的安全。”在联合国的回应中，印度表示和平仍是其立场，但明确指出将对恐怖主义作出回应，拒绝核讹诈，并追究支持非国家行为体的国家的责任。
On proliferation, Bedi referred to the history of the AQ Khan network, saying it had contributed to the adoption of Security Council Resolution 1540 nearly two decades ago. He said this remained relevant amid demands for unquestioned nuclear cooperation and the transfer of advanced weapons and military capabilities. "We urge all states and all responsible suppliers to exercise the highest degree of vigilance, not because of India, but for their own security," he said. In its response at the UN, India said peace remains its position, but made clear that it will respond to terrorism, reject nuclear blackmail and hold states responsible for backing non-state actors.