特朗普政府周三在一个倾向自由派的上诉法院取得胜利，该法院暂时阻止了加州一项法律的部分条款，该条款要求便衣联邦执法人员在执行任务时出示警徽和身份证件。
The Trump administration scored a victory at a liberal-leaning appeals court Wednesday, which temporarily blocked a section of a California law requiring plainclothes federal law enforcement agents to show their badges and identification when carrying out operations.
第九巡回上诉法院裁定，特朗普政府在对加州的诉讼中“肯定会胜诉”，认为《反私刑法案》的身份识别要求违反了宪法的至上条款，该条款规定当联邦法律与州法律冲突时，联邦法律优先。
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Trump administration was "certain to succeed" in its lawsuit against California, finding that the No Vigilantes Act’s identification requirement violates the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which says federal law takes priority when it conflicts with state law.
“第10条明确凌驾于联邦政府决定是否、如何以及何时公开识别其官员的权力之上，”合议庭写道。
"Section 10 explicitly overrides the federal government’s power to determine whether, how, and when to publicly identify its officers," the panel wrote.
该初步禁令来自一个联邦上诉法院，该法院曾多次因特朗普政府的一些标志性移民政策而与其发生冲突，包括在2018年阻止削减对庇护城市联邦资金的努力，同年限制收紧庇护资格的尝试，以及在2017年拒绝恢复特朗普针对若干以穆斯林为主的国家的旅行禁令。
The preliminary injunction comes from a federal appeals court that has repeatedly clashed with the Trump administration over some of its signature immigration policies, including blocking efforts to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities in 2018, restricting attempts to tighten asylum eligibility that same year and refusing to reinstate Trump's travel ban targeting several predominantly Muslim countries in 2017.
联邦法院阻止纽森试图束缚ICE的举动，特朗普移民政策获胜 该裁决对加州民主党州长加文·纽森构成重大打击，纽森被广泛视为2028年总统竞选的有力人选。纽森将自己定位为特朗普移民议程的主要反对者，他推出了一系列旨在保护移民社区、限制联邦移民执法行动以及加强对州内联邦特工监督的法律。
FEDERAL COURT BLOCKS NEWSOM’S BID TO SHACKLE ICE IN TRUMP IMMIGRATION WIN The ruling comes as a major blow to California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, widely viewed as a 2028 presidential hopeful. Newsom has positioned himself as a leading opponent of Trump's immigration agenda,g a series of laws aimed at protecting immigrant communities, restricting federal immigration enforcement operations and increasing oversight of federal agents in the state.
2025年11月，特朗普政府以《禁止私刑法案》（No Vigilantes Act）和《禁止秘密警察法案》（No Secret Police Act）中的相关规定为由，起诉加利福尼亚州。这些法案禁止执法人员佩戴口罩。由克林顿任命的法官克里斯蒂娜·斯奈德（Christina Snyder）最初裁定《禁止秘密警察法案》中针对联邦官员的口罩禁令无效，但拒绝取消《禁止私刑法案》中对执法人员佩戴身份证明的要求。
The Trump administration sued California over provisions in the No Vigilantes Act and No Secret Police Act, which restricts law enforcement officers from wearing face coverings, in November 2025. Judge Christina Snyder, a Clinton-appointed judge, initially blocked the No Secret Police Act's mask restriction for federal officers but declined to block the No Vigilantes Act's identification requirement.
特朗普政府对斯奈德的这一裁决提出上诉。2月，第九巡回上诉法院暂时禁止了该法案的实施，并在4月作出裁决，允许在上诉期间继续执行该法案。
The Trump administration appealed Snyder's decision on the identification requirement, and the Ninth Circuit temporarily blocked its enforcement in February before granting an injunction pending appeal in April.
联邦法官驳回纽约州禁止移民与海关执法局（ICE）官员佩戴口罩的法律加利福尼亚州辩称，其要求执法人员佩戴身份证明的规定并不构成对联邦政府的违宪干预——因为只有当州法律“对联邦政府的运作造成实质性负担”时，才属于违宪行为。但上诉法院裁定，该州根本无权直接监管联邦官员。
FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS NEW YORK LAW BANNING ICE AGENTS FROM WEARING MASKS California argued that its identification requirement did not amount to an unconstitutional regulation of the federal government because a state law crosses that line only when it "impose[s] substantial burdens on federal operations."
法院在裁决中写道：“无论这种规定对联邦政府运作的‘负担’是否严重，都无关紧要。”
But the appeals court ruled that the state never had the authority to directly regulate federal officials.
这一由自由派倾向的上诉法院作出的裁决得到了特朗普政府官员的赞扬，其中包括司法部民事司助理司法部长布雷特·舒马特（Brett Shumate）。
"The burden of the regulation on federal operations, whether substantial or otherwise, is irrelevant," the court wrote.
美国司法部警告：随着这位前共和党州长开始实施针对联邦执法部门的限制措施，该州正逐渐沦为下一个“加州”。
The liberal appeals court ruling drew praise from Trump administration officials, including Brett Shumate, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Civil Division.
“第九巡回上诉法院一致认为，加州无权对联邦执法行为进行监管，”舒马特在一份政治新闻通讯中写道。
DOJ WARNS FORMER RED STATE IS BECOMING THE NEXT CALIFORNIA AS GOVERNOR EMBRACES ICE LIMITS "The Ninth Circuit agrees that California cannot regulate federal law enforcement," Schumate wrote on SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER "Today, the Ninth Circuit again affirms what common sense makes clear: California cannot regulate how Federal law enforcement officers carry out their jobs authorized by Congress," Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward, Jr. wrote on X. "Today's decision is a huge WIN for protecting the safety of our Nation's law enforcement officers and ensuring @POTUS 's promise to enforce our Nation's immigration laws."
“今天，第九巡回上诉法院再次重申了一个显而易见的道理：加州无权干涉联邦执法官员根据国会授权所执行的任务，”司法部副部长斯坦利·伍德沃德在社交媒体上表示。“这一裁决对于保护我国执法官员的安全，以及确保总统特朗普履行‘执行国家移民法律’的承诺，具有重大意义。”福克斯新闻数字频道已联系纽森的办公室寻求评论。
Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom's office for comment.