字号·· | 护眼
南华早报

中国团队领衔研究:利用“地震涟漪”预测地震,成功率高达83%China-led team hits 83% success rate anticipating earthquakes in ‘seismo-ripples’ study

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

中国领导的国际团队报告了一种新的地震前现象,自2022年以来,该现象对大型地震表现出强烈的预测潜力,且失误极少。

A China-led international team has reported a new pre-earthquake phenomenon that has shown strong predictive potential for major earthquakes since 2022 with minimal failures.

他们观察到的异常地震、磁场和电离层共振信号——研究人员将其称为“地震涟漪”——是地震发生前触发的环形扰动模式。

The anomalous seismic, magnetic and ionospheric resonance signals they observed – termed “seismo-ripples” by the researchers – are ringlike disturbance patterns triggered before earthquakes happen.

他们的发现挑战了长期以来认为这些事件无法预测的科学观念,为地震预测开辟了一条充满希望的新途径。

Their findings challenge the long-standing scientific belief that these events are unpredictable, opening up a promising new path to earthquake prediction.

“历史上,地震预测一直被认为几乎不可能实现,”来自中国大陆和台湾的研究机构,以及巴西和日本的团队在周日发表于同行评审期刊《NPJ自然灾害》的论文中表示。

“Historically, earthquake prediction has been considered nearly infeasible,” said the team from institutes in mainland China and Taiwan, along with Brazil and Japan, in a paper published in the peer-reviewed journal NPJ Natural Hazards on Sunday.

利用从地震仪、磁力计和地面全球导航卫星系统接收器收集的数据,研究人员将这些异常模式与2022年至2024年中国境内的12次大型地震进行了核对。

Using data collected from seismometers, magnetometers and ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System receivers, the anomalous patterns were verified against 12 major earthquakes in China between 2022 and 2024.

“自2022年6月起,基于地震涟漪的潜在异常对多次震级大于或等于六级的地震展现出强烈的预测能力,且失误极少甚至没有失误,”研究人员在论文中写道。

“Since June 2022, prospective anomaly based on seismo-ripples has demonstrated a strong predictive capability for numerous earthquakes with a magnitude [greater than or equal to] six, with remarkably minimal to no failure,” the researchers wrote.

一个国际研究团队考察了2022年至2024年间中国发生的12次大地震。图片来源:供图The international team looked at 12 major earthquakes in China between 2022 and 2024. Photo: Handout

在他们提出的可能与未来地震相关的12个地点中,有83%的地点在“地震涟漪”模式出现后三个月内发生了对应的地震。

Of the 12 sites they proposed could be associated with future earthquakes, 83 per cent experienced a corresponding earthquake within three months of the seismo-ripple patterns emerging.

预测震中与实际震中之间的平均距离约为280公里(174英里),而估算的震级比最终的地震读数大约高出0.5个单位。

The average distance between predicted and actual epicentres was about 280km (174 miles) and the estimated magnitudes ran about 0.5 units larger than the final seismic readings.

“我们论文的核心论点本质上是,地震并非固有不可预测,”该研究的主要作者、成都理工大学教授陈杰宏说道。

“In essence, the core argument of our paper is that earthquakes are not inherently unpredictable,” said Chen Chieh-Hung, a lead author of the study and a professor at the Chengdu University of Technology.

陈指出,预测对不同的人可能意味着不同的事情,有些人期望精确到具体分钟或在几公里范围内的准确性,他说这在目前阶段是不可行的。

Chen noted that prediction could mean different things to different people, with some expecting precision down to the exact minute or accuracy within a margin of a few kilometres, which he said would not be feasible at this stage.

“然而,我们已经打开了一个门。地震并非无法预测,”他在周三表示。“它们有可能被预测。下一步是让科学界致力于提升这种精度。”亚洲是世界上地震活动最频繁的地区之一,尽管中国仅占全球陆地面积的约7%,但其经历的大陆地震约占全球总数的三分之一。

“Nevertheless, we have opened a door. Earthquakes are not beyond the realm of prediction,” he said on Wednesday. “There is a possibility that they can be predicted. The next step is for the scientific community to work on refining this precision.”Asia is one of the world’s most seismically active regions, with China experiencing roughly a third of all continental earthquakes despite having only about 7 per cent of the global land area.

评估长期地震概率——例如日本评估南海海槽在未来三十年发生大地震的概率较高——是一种被接受的科学方法。然而,数十年来,短期地震预测一直难以捉摸且存在争议。

Estimating long-term seismic probabilities – such as Japan’s assessment of a high probability for a major earthquake along the Nankai Trough in the next three decades – is an accepted scientific approach. However, for decades, short-term earthquake prediction has been elusive and controversial.

根据美国地质调查局的说法,真正的地震预测必须明确三个参数:日期和时间、地点以及即将发生事件的震级。

According to the United States Geological Survey, a true earthquake prediction must specify three parameters: the date and time, the location and the magnitude of the incoming event.

这与地震预报不同,后者是计算在地定区域和时间窗口内发生地震的概率。

This differs from earthquake forecasting, which calculates the probability of an earthquake occurring within a given area and time window.

陈表示,认为地震无法预测的科学共识部分源于20世纪90年代发表在《自然》和《科学》等顶级期刊上的论文。此后,他表示,这种观点“实际上成为了一条既定规则”。

Chen said the scientific consensus that earthquakes could not be predicted stemmed in part from papers published in the top journals Nature and Science in the 1990s. From then on, he said, this belief “effectively became an established rule”.

“在科学界,普遍认为地震是不可预测的,大多数研究者更倾向于不涉足这一有争议的领域,”他补充道。

“Within the scientific community, the prevailing view is that earthquakes are unpredictable, and most researchers prefer not to wade into such controversial waters,” he added.

陈还指出,曾经被认为不可能的其他里程碑,例如精准的天气预报和飞机突破音障。

Chen pointed to other milestones once thought impossible, such as accurate weather forecasting and aircraft breaking the sound barrier.

“更准确的说法是,我们尚未发现一种可靠、理性有效或科学依据充分的方法来预测地震的发生,”他说。

“A more accurate way to frame it would be to say that we have yet to discover a sound, rationally valid or scientifically grounded method for predicting the occurrence of earthquakes,” he said.

陈表示,如果预测的标准被设定得极高,那么确实无法实现。相反,他认为科学工作应将重点从长期预测转向短期到中期预测。

Chen said that if the bar for prediction were set extremely high, then it would indeed be impossible. Instead, he argued that scientific efforts should focus on shifting from long-term forecasts to short-to-medium-term predictions.

来自世界各地的研究人员一直在寻找地震前兆或地震发生前出现的信号,这些信号可能被用于更可靠的预测,甚至精确预测。

Researchers from around the world have sought to identify earthquake precursors or signals occurring before seismic events that could be used for more reliable forecasting or even predictions.

在他们的论文中,由中国领导的团队探讨了一种称为地震圈或地震涟漪的环状扰动现象,这种现象似乎从未来地震震中向外传播。

In their paper, the China-led team explored a phenomenon of ringlike disturbances called seismo-circles or seismo-ripples that appear to propagate outwards from future earthquake epicentres.

“这一现象特别有趣的地方在于,起初我们并不知道它是真实存在还是假象,”陈说。

“What’s particularly interesting about this phenomenon is that, initially, we did not know whether it was real or false,” Chen said.

为了验证他们的发现,团队调查了过去的地震案例。他们发现,在2021年一天内相继发生的两次中国地震中,分别形成了类似涟漪的异常现象。

To verify their findings, the team investigated past earthquake cases. They found that separate ripple-like anomalies had formed for two earthquakes that struck China within a day of each other in 2021.

陈表示,这一发现让团队有信心继续深入研究,随后两年里他们记录了这些异常现象并提交了正式报告。

Chen said this revelation gave the team the confidence to pursue the research further, and over the following two years they documented the anomalous occurrences and submitted formal reports.

2022年4月,在检测到中国西南部出现异常涟漪模式后,研究人员向中国地震网络中心——该国官方负责地震监测和预测评估的机构——提交了一份正式文件,宣告可能在两个月内发生一次6.3级地震。

In April 2022, after detecting anomalous ripple patterns in southwestern China, the researchers submitted a formal document to the China Earthquake Networks Centre – the country’s official body for earthquake monitoring and prediction evaluation – declaring a possible magnitude 6.3 event within two months.

2022年9月5日,四川省雅安市石棉县人民医院外,医护人员正在转移病人。此前,邻近的泸定县发生了地震。图片来源:新华社/美联社Medical workers transfer patients outside Renmin Hospital of Shimian county in Yaan, Sichuan province, following an earthquake in neighbouring Luding county on September 5, 2022. Photo: Xinhua via AP

2022年6月1日,中国西南部四川省发生一次6.1级地震,震中距该团队预测的震中399公里。

On June 1, 2022, a magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck China’s southwestern Sichuan province, occurring 399km from the team’s predicted epicentre.

随后,他们在2022年至2024年间开展工作,挑战地震本质不可预测的观点,定期监测地震涟漪,并向有关部门提交正式报告。

They then launched an effort between 2022 and 2024 to challenge the idea that earthquakes were inherently unpredictable, routinely monitoring seismo-ripples and submitting formal reports to authorities.

该团队表示,其调查凸显了地震涟波与即将发生的地震事件之间的关联,从而能够“可靠地估算地震的震级、位置和时间”。

The team said its investigation highlighted a correlation between seismo-ripples and forthcoming seismic events, allowing for “reliable estimation of earthquake magnitude, location and timing”.

他们指出,仍有挑战需要应对,包括模糊的涟波信号导致精确估算变得复杂,以及需要更深入地理解这些异常背后的物理机制。此外,地震涟波的探测仍受仪器密度和空间网络覆盖范围的限制。

They noted there were still challenges to address, including ambiguous ripple signals that complicated exact estimates and the need for deeper understanding of the physics behind these anomalies. In addition, seismo-ripple detection remains limited by instrument density and spatial network coverage.

为提高精度,中国正在建设一个升级版的地面观测系统。展望未来,该团队计划纳入卫星数据和人工智能,以增强监测能力。

To improve precision, an upgraded ground-based observation system is under construction in China. Looking ahead, the team plans to incorporate satellite data and artificial intelligence to enhance monitoring capabilities.

虽然他们的研究聚焦于中国的南北地震带,但研究人员表示,地震涟波现象具有全球应用的潜力。

While their study focused on China’s North-South Seismic Belt, the researchers said the seismo-ripple phenomenon held potential for global application.

陈表示,他们论文的主要目标不是宣称地震已经可以被预测,而是表明地震并非固有不可预测。

Chen said the main goal of their paper was not to claim that earthquakes could already be predicted but rather that they were not inherently unpredictable.

“在这个阶段,我们已经能够区分出可能与地震相关的信号和无关的信号——这是我们以前无法做到的,”他说。

“At this stage, we are already able to distinguish between signals that are likely related to earthquakes and those that are not – a distinction we could not make previously,” he said.

“下一个挑战是提高精度,特别是在地震事件的位置和时间方面。”陈承认,在地震预测成为完全可行的现实之前,还有很长的路要走。但他表示,他的团队致力于这一任务,并邀请其他科学家来检验他们的地震涟波模型。

“The next challenge is to improve precision, particularly regarding the location and timing of seismic events.”Chen acknowledged that there was a long way to go before earthquake prediction would become a fully functional reality. But he said his team was committed to the task and invited other scientists to put their seismo-ripples model to the test.