
参议员谢尔顿·怀特豪斯(民主党-罗得岛州)周三批评拜登政府在最高法院问题上缺乏行动,称他们“完全胆怯”。
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., called out the Biden administration on Wednesday for a lack of action taken on the Supreme Court and said they were "completely chicken" on it.
《杠杆》的大卫·西罗塔向怀特豪斯询问,如果一位民主党总统认为最高法院“正在助长一个反民主项目”,那么对法院的“合法”抵抗会是什么样子。怀特豪斯说:“嗯,我认为这始于说出真相,我认为美国总统拥有众所周知的‘说客讲坛’,而且是所有讲坛中最响亮的,应该准备好就法院出了什么问题提出论证。拜登政府极不愿意这样做。他们完全胆怯了。拜登成立了那个关于最高法院的无效委员会委员会,然后当格特纳法官和特里布教授想要描述法院的一些实际问题时,他把他们都压制住了,以至于他们甚至无法把这些内容写进报告。”
The Lever's David Sirota asked Whitehouse about what "legitimate" resistance to the court might look like if a Democratic president believed the Supreme Court was "enabling an anti-democratic project." "Well, I think it starts with truth telling and I think the chief executive of the United States has the proverbial bully, the bulliest of all pulpits, and should be prepared to make the argument about what has gone wrong with the courts.
自由派大法官因快速处理紧急 docket 案件而猛烈抨击最高法院。他继续说:“拜登团队不想涉足那里。他们对所有这些事情完全胆怯。他们不想参与其中。而且——真的直到最后,在他和哈里斯都输掉选举之后的最后一次演讲中,拜登似乎至少在某种程度上意识到最高法院存在真正的诚信问题。”
The Biden administration was highly reluctant to do that. They completely chickened out. Biden set up that lame committee commission on the Supreme Court and then squelched both Judge Gertner and Professor Tribe when they wanted to describe some of the actual problems at the court so that they couldn't even get that into the report," Whitehouse said. He continued, "The Biden people didn't want to go there.
回顾:民主党参议员卷入利益冲突纠纷,因伦理运动而成为最高法院的目标。南希·格特纳和劳伦斯·特里布曾担任前总统拜登的最高法院总统委员会成员。格特纳和特里布于2021年12月在《华盛顿邮报》发表社论,呼吁增加最高法院大法官人数,尽管该委员会最终未就增加大法官人数发表任何立场。
They were completely chicken about all that. They wanted no part of that. And it — really wasn't until the very end, in his last speech after he and Harris had both lost that Biden seemed to have at least somewhat awakened to the fact that the Supreme Court had a real integrity problem." Nancy Gertner and Laurence Tribe served on former President Biden's Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court.
民主党参议员称共和党在2016年和2020年“窃取”了最高法院两个席位,呼吁扩大最高法院格特纳和部落是委员会34名成员中的两人,他们在《华盛顿邮报》上写道:“我们现在认为,国会必须扩大最高法院的规模,并且尽快这么做。我们并非轻率得出这一结论。”
Gertner and Tribe wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post in December 2021, calling for adding more justices to the court after the commission ultimately took no position on adding more justices. Gertner and Tribe were two of the 34 members of the commission, and wrote in The Washington Post, "We now believe that Congress must expand the size of the Supreme Court and do so as soon as possible.
怀特豪斯一直是最高法院道德立法的支持者,他主张最高法院已被“右翼亿万富翁和特殊利益集团”所控制。
We did not come to this conclusion lightly." Whitehouse has been a proponent of Supreme Court ethics legislation as he has argued that the Court has been captured by "right-wing billionaires and special interests."
加文·纽森对“填塞”最高法院持开放态度,称选举人团制度“扭曲”。前副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯在周三的一次采访中呼吁扩大最高法院,这是她提出的一系列重大制度性改革之一,其中包括选举人团改革。
Former Vice President Kamala Harris called for expanding the Supreme Court during an interview on Wednesday, among other big institutional changes, which included Electoral College reform.
“我们可以做的关于夺回众议院和参议院的工作,将涉及许多方面。例如,我认为我们需要扩大最高法院。我们需要最高法院有更多大法官,以便我们能够有一个真正体现美国宪法精神和原则的法院,”哈里斯在她的《宝贝,这是基基·帕尔默》播客节目中告诉播客主持人基基·帕尔默。”我认为我们应该推动围绕改革选举人团所能实现的事情。对吧?”
"The work that we can do about winning back the House and the Senate is going to be on a number of things. For example, I believe that we need to expand the Supreme Court. We need more justices on the Supreme Court so that we can have a court that actually reinforces the spirit and principles behind the Constitution of the United States," Harris told podcast host Keke Palmer on her "Baby, This is Keke Palmer" podcast. "I believe that we should be pushing for what is possible around changing the Electoral College. Right?"
哈里斯因计划从根本上改革最高法院和选举人团而被贴上“制度纵火犯”的标签。她还主张为华盛顿特区和波多黎各争取州地位。她的这些言论是在她的2024年竞选搭档、明尼苏达州州长蒂姆·沃尔兹警告称,如果民主党未能兑现结构性改革的承诺,那么在夺回国会并可能在2028年赢得总统大选后,党内将面临清算之后几天发表的。
She also called for pursing statehood for Washington, D.C., as well as Puerto Rico. Her comments come days after her 2024 vice presidential running mate, Gov. Tim Walz, warned of a reckoning among Democrats if the party fails to deliver on structural change and promises should they take back Congress and potentially the presidency in 2028.
“民主党通过宪法修正案改变最高法院组成的可能性几乎为零,而通过立法(如扩大席位数量或设立任期限制)来改变则极其困难。这不过是空想,是幻想,仅仅是用来激发其基本盘热情的东西。” 西北大学兼职法学教授安德鲁·斯托尔曼在对福克斯新闻数字版的声明中说道。
"The odds of Democrats changing the composition of the Supreme Court through a constitutional amendment are near zero, while changing it via statutory legislation (such as expanding the number of seats or imposing term limits) would be extraordinarily difficult. It is a pipe dream. A fantasy. It’s nothing more than something to get their base excited about," Northwestern adjunct law professor Andrew Stoltmann told Fox News Digital in a statement.

他继续表示:“宪法修正案需要众议院和参议院三分之二的票数通过,随后需要四分之三(即50个州立法机构中的38个)的州立法机构批准。鉴于政治上的深刻分歧,这几乎不可能实现。民主党争论这是一个现实的可能性几乎显得荒唐。” 拜登办公室未回应福克斯新闻数字版的置评请求。
He continued, "A constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, followed by ratification by three-fourths (38 of 50) of state legislatures. Given the deep divides, politically, this is almost impossible. It’s almost silly for Democrats to be arguing that this is a realistic possibility." Biden's office did not respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.