字号·· | 护眼
微软全国广播公司

特朗普政府取消胡德堡枪手处决直播计划说明了什么What the canceled livestream of the Fort Hood shooter’s execution says about the Trump administration

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

2026年10月6日,国防部长皮特·赫格塞思在白宫南草坪聆听总统唐纳德·特朗普对记者讲话。Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listens while President Donald Trump speaks to reporters on the South Lawn of the White House on Oct. 6, 2026.

每周,MS NOW法律分析师、我们“主司法”播客的联合主持人安德鲁·魏斯曼,将在MS NOW会员专属系列“与安德鲁·魏斯曼问答”中回答观众的法律问题。本周,魏斯曼回答了MS NOW会员戴安娜和猫咪B’Lee关于特朗普政府取消计划直播胡德堡枪手纳达尔·哈桑处决的问题。观看他的回答请看上方视频。本周魏斯曼还回答了其他读者的问题:当国会委员会传唤宣誓作证的证人,比如杰克·史密斯,一些人认为这是为了抓住他伪证,那么提问者是否也应宣誓?如果他们故意做出虚假陈述,是否也应受到伪证罪的制约?

Each week, MS NOW legal analyst Andrew Weissmann, co-host of our “Main Justice” podcast, answers legal questions from our audience in our MS NOW Membership exclusive series, “Answers with Andrew Weissmann.”This week, Weissmann addresses a question from MS NOW Member Diana and B’Lee the Kitten on the Trump administration canceling its plan to livestream the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nadal Hasan. Watch his response above. Other reader questions Weissmann addressed this week: Would it be possible when congressional committees subpoena a witness under oath, like Jack Smith, some thinking to catch him in perjury, that the questioners also be under oath too? If they willingly make false statements, shouldn’t they be subject to perjury?

法院如何能让关于马阿拉戈文件案的杰克·史密斯报告保密?我的税款支付了这项调查,针对三名共谋者的案件已经结案。我不明白特别检察官收集的信息为什么不对美国公民公开,也不通过《信息自由法》提供。

I would like to know how the courts can keep the Jack Smith report on the Mar-a-Lago documents case hidden? My tax dollars paid for this investigation, and a case against three co-conspirators has been closed. I don’t understand why the information gathered by the special prosecutor is not available to the U.S. citizenship or available under the Freedom of Information Act.

如果像阿贝尔森所说,法律不是写出来的,而是被执行的,我们如何改变体制来保证法治(即执行国会立法的内容)?

If as Abelson suggests, the law is not what is written, but what is enforced, how can we change our system to guarantee the rule of law (i.e., the enforcement of what Congress legislates)?

白宫官员表示,尽管联邦法官下令政府停止,他们仍不会向美国人报销2000万美元纳税人资助的亲特朗普广告活动的费用。美国纳税人有什么法律途径来应对政府在不太合法的事情上的不负责任的支出?成为MS NOW会员以

White House officials said they would not reimburse Americans for the $20 million taxpayer-funded pro-Trump ad campaigns, despite a federal judge ordering the administration to stop. Is there any legal recourse American taxpayers can take to confront the administration’s irresponsible spending on things that aren’t quite legal? Become an MS NOW Member to