
福克斯独家报道——一位黑人保守派电影制作人正在挑战史密森尼博物馆,要求其解释,为何他质疑进步派种族观点的纪录片至今未能在其非裔美国人历史博物馆获得公开放映,而该博物馆此前曾放映过探讨系统性种族主义的影片。
FIRST ON FOX — A Black conservative filmmaker is challenging the Smithsonian to explain why his documentary questioning progressive views on race has yet to secure a public screening at its African American history museum, which has previously showcased films examining systemic racism.
《白人愧疚感》由埃利·斯蒂尔执导并联合制作,该片基于其父、著名黑人保守派学者谢尔比·斯蒂尔的著作。年轻的斯蒂尔是黑人、犹太人和聋人,他借鉴自身经历,挑战关于种族和身份的主流观点。
"White Guilt," directed and co-produced by Eli Steele, is based on a book by his father, noted Black conservative academic Shelby Steele. The younger Steele, who is Black, Jewish and deaf, has drawn on his own experiences to challenge prevailing views on race and identity.
该纪录片认为,白人对美国种族历史的愧疚感,以及害怕被贴上种族主义者标签的恐惧,促使各机构将种族身份置于个人才干之上。
The documentary argues that White guilt over America's racial history, along with fears of being labeled racist, has pushed institutions to prioritize racial identity over individual merit.
这场争议发生之际,史密森尼博物馆正面临来自特朗普总统及其政府的日益增大的压力,后者指控该机构在描绘美国历史方面存在意识形态偏见。白宫指责该机构推动进步派叙事,并威胁要限制联邦支持,这升级了关于哪些观点应在国家博物馆中得到体现的更广泛斗争。
The dispute comes as the Smithsonian faces mounting pressure from President Donald Trump and his administration over allegations of ideological bias in its portrayal of American history. The White House has accused the institution of promoting progressive narratives and threatened to restrict federal support, escalating a broader battle over whose perspectives are represented in the nation's museums.
史密森尼美国250展览展出的自由派物品数量是保守派物品的三倍。斯蒂尔向福克斯新闻数字版提供了通信记录,显示博物馆拒绝了他提出的放映日期,并向他提供了私人租赁选项。这位电影制作人表示,博物馆尚未回复他关于公开放映替代日期的请求。
Steele provided communications to Fox News Digital showing that the museum declined his proposed screening dates and offered him a private rental option instead. The filmmaker says the museum has yet to respond to his request for alternative dates for a public screening.
“影片拍摄专业,质量有保证。他们放映过的一部类似影片是《第十三修正案》,而该片本身就是一部非常有争议的影片,”斯蒂尔告诉福克斯新闻数字版。“所以我们在这里面临的大问题是:我们是否拥有观点多样性?在史密森尼博物馆放映,是否必须是正确类型的黑人?”
"The film is professionally shot, the quality is there. A comparable film that they've shown is '13th,' which itself is a very controversial film," Steele told Fox News Digital. "So that's the big question we have here: Do we have viewpoint diversity or do we not? Do you have to be the right kind of Black to be shown at the Smithsonian?"

“这是我们必须在这个房间里解决的大问题。但我希望这与这些都无关,”他继续说道。
"That's the big question that we have to address in this room. But I hope that it's not about any of that," he continued.
电影制作人质疑了博物馆不放映他电影的明显决定,鉴于该博物馆曾允许许多其他传递更进步信息的电影进行公开放映,尽管他并未直接指责博物馆存在意识形态歧视。
The filmmaker has questioned the apparent decision to not screen his film, given that the museum has allowed numerous other films with more progressive messages to have public screenings, though stopped short of accusing the museum of ideological discrimination.
斯蒂尔提到的电影《第13条修正案》在国家非裔美国人历史与文化博物馆(NMAAHC)的教育和公共项目中被展出。该片认为,第13条修正案中允许将强制劳动作为犯罪惩罚的例外条款,通过所谓地将黑人行为刑事化,使得种族控制在奴隶制废除后仍得以延续。
"13th," the film mentioned by Steele, is featured in educational and public programming at the NMAAHC. It argues that the 13th Amendment’s exception permitting forced labor as punishment for a crime enabled racial control to persist after slavery by allegedly criminalizing Black behavior.
国家非裔美国人历史与文化博物馆在公开放映中还展映过诸如《隐藏人物》(2016年)、《我不是你的黑鬼》(2017年)以及《黑人之信:对非裔拉美裔灵性的探索》(2023年)等影片,其中后者是与史密森尼民俗生活节合作呈现的。
Other films shown by the NMAAHC in public screenings include such titles as "Hidden Figures" in 2016, "I Am Not Your Negro" in 2017 and "Faith in Blackness: An Exploration of AfroLatine Spirituality" in 2023, the latter presented in partnership with the Smithsonian Folklife Festival.
尽管斯蒂尔不愿猜测他电影未被安排公开放映的原因,但其他黑人保守派认为博物馆对其请求的处理属于一种熟悉的模式。
While Steele was hesitant to speculate as to why his film hadn't been scheduled for a public screening, other Black conservatives saw the museum's handling of his request as part of a familiar pattern.
“学术界如今已不复当年我攻读研究生时的模样,当时它自称为思想的市场,”退休的黑人保守派教授、著名媒体评论员卡罗尔·斯温对福克斯新闻数字版表示。“那时总会有一个象征性的保守派被纳入。而多年来,我发现保守派受到的容忍度越来越低。而且如果他们是黑人,到了某个时候,他们甚至根本不被容忍。”
"Academia is not what it was years ago when I went to graduate school, when it touted itself as a marketplace for ideas," Carol Swain, a retired Black conservative professor and prominent media commentator, told Fox News Digital. "There would always be a token conservative included. And I have found over the years that conservatives were tolerated less and less. And if they were black, at some point they were not tolerated at all."

“当你看史密森尼这样的机构时,它本应属于我们所有人,属于所有美国人,你会认为它应该对不同观点持开放态度,”斯温继续说道,她曾在普林斯顿大学和范德比尔特大学等机构任职。“但事实并非如此。”华尔街日报专栏作家、曼哈顿研究所高级研究员杰森·赖利也持有类似观点。
"When you look at an institution like the Smithsonian, that's supposed to belong to all of us, to all Americans, you would think that it would be open to divergent views," Swain, who spent her career at institutions such as Princeton and Vanderbilt, continued. "That is not what we find." Wall Street Journal columnist and Manhattan Institute senior fellow Jason Riley shared a similar perspective.
前民主党工作人员、DEI领导人塑造史密森尼领导层,政治风暴正酣“我认为管理史密森尼研究所的人属于这个国家在学术界占主导地位、在媒体占主导地位的更广泛的自由派知识分子群体。这不是一种观点。他们所持的正是仁爱,”Riley对福克斯新闻数字版说。“事实上,这部电影对这群人进行了一些相当直接的攻击。因此这里可能存在一些私利。它可能触到了这些人的痛处。”
"I think the type of people who run the Smithsonian Institute are part of the broader liberal intelligentsia in this country that prevails in academia, prevails and the media. And this is not a point of view. That they take kindness to," Riley told Fox News Digital. "In fact, this film takes some rather direct shots at that group of people. So there might be some self-interest here. It might cut a little too close to these folks."

“我确实认为他们有既得利益,要在那里推出一种叙事来推进政治议程。我认为这就是在史密森尼等地方真正发生的事情,”Riley继续说道,引用了他作为黑人评论员的经历,他职业生涯一直在与白人自由派进行交锋。特朗普诉史密森尼:白宫围绕“觉醒”历史的斗争时间线Riley和Swain都认为,观看这部电影可能会通过挑战白人进步派对种族的假设、迫使他们面对自己偏好的政策是否真的在帮助黑人美国,从而对白人进步派起到一定作用。
"I do think that they have a vested interest in putting forward a narrative out there to advance a political agenda. And I think that's what's really going on here at places like the Smithsonian," Riley continued, citing his experience as a Black commentator who has spent his career sparring with White liberals. Both Riley and Swain argued that viewing the film could do a service to White progressives by challenging their assumptions about race and forcing them to confront whether their preferred policies are actually helping Black America.
Riley表示,经常参加非裔美国人历史与文化国家博物馆(NMAAHC)的黑人美国人可能会从斯蒂尔的电影中受益,因为该电影挑战了他们因种族而被阻碍社会流动性的流行假设。
Riley stated that the Black Americans who regularly attend the NMAAHC could benefit from Steele’s film as it challenges the popular assumption that they are blocked from social mobility by virtue of their race.
近年来,史密森尼一直是共和党当选官员的批评对象,包括总统,他们认为该机构允许政治偏见掩盖了历史的中立呈现,组织内部有些人持不同意见,称他们只是在呈现美国故事的好与坏两方面。作为施压史密森尼以应对其所谓意识形态偏见的一部分,特朗普政府威胁要限制联邦支持,包括酌情拨款和联邦机构的合作。
In recent months, the Smithsonian has been the target of criticism from Republican elected officials, including the president, who argue that the institution has allowed political bias to overshadow the neutral presentation of history, an argument some within the organization reject, claiming that they are simply presenting the good and the bad aspects of the American story. As part of its effort to pressure the Smithsonian over what it describes as ideological bias, the Trump administration has threatened to restrict federal support, including discretionary grants and cooperation from federal agencies.
根据福克斯新闻数字版审阅的通信,虽然赖利和斯韦恩对史密森尼的动机提出了质疑,但博物馆告诉斯蒂尔,他提出的日期不可用,但并未说明是否会考虑为公开放映安排其他日期。
While Riley and Swain raised questions about the Smithsonian's motives, the museum told Steele that his proposed dates were unavailable but did not explain whether it would consider alternative dates for a public screening, according to correspondence reviewed by Fox News Digital.
根据福克斯新闻数字版审阅的通信,斯蒂尔及其团队在八月下旬联系了史密森尼,希望公开放映他们的电影,并在当天收到回复,指引他们填写活动申请表。九月初,他们提交了填写完整的申请表,并提供了两个可能的放映日期。
Steele and his team reached out to the Smithsonian in late August about a public screening of their film, receiving a response within the day directing them to fill out an event application form, according to correspondence reviewed by Fox News Digital. In early September, they submitted a completed application form and provided two possible dates for a screening.
根据通信,大约两周后,非裔美国人历史与文化国家博物馆(NMAAHC)回复称,这两个日期均不可用于公开放映。根据福克斯新闻数字版审阅的通信,斯蒂尔团队询问替代方案后,博物馆提供了以35,000美元的报价租用场地进行私人放映的选项,而不是安排博物馆赞助的公开放映。
About two weeks later, the NMAAHC responded by informing them that neither date was available for a public screening, according to the correspondence. After Steele's team asked about alternatives, the museum offered them the option of renting space for a private screening at a quoted cost of $35,000, according to correspondence reviewed by Fox News Digital, rather than arranging a museum-sponsored public screening.
在史密森尼庞大的博物馆网络内部,该网络正遭到特朗普政府的抨击。根据福克斯新闻数字版审阅的通信,当斯蒂尔及其团队澄清他们希望进行公开放映,并表示对所请日期具有灵活性时,他们未收到博物馆的任何回复。
When Steele and his team clarified that they wanted a public screening and signaled flexibility on their requested dates, they received no response from the museum, per correspondence reviewed by Fox News Digital.

“回复邮件也不需要那么多时间,”斯蒂尔对福克斯新闻数字版说道。
"Answering email does not take that much time," Steele told Fox News Digital. "I watched the film last night.
“我昨晚观看了这部电影。它是对谢尔比·斯蒂尔过去40年一直在发展的思想的制作精良且有力的呈现,” 布朗大学非裔美国人教授格伦·洛里,他曾形容自己为“倾向保守”,对福克斯新闻数字版说道。“这些思想 — — 关于种族身份如何与‘黑人力量’的追求以及西方对‘白人无辜’的探索相互作用 — — 通过电影对若干典型案例的探讨得到了生动的阐释。”
It's a well-made and powerful representation of ideas that Shelby Steele has been developing over the last 40 years," Glenn Loury, an African American professor at Brown University who has described himself as "conservative-leaning," told Fox News Digital. "Those ideas — about how racial identity interacts with the pursuit of ‘black power’ and the quest for ‘white innocence’ in the West — are vividly illuminated through the film's exploration of a number of exemplary cases."
“斯蒂尔在电影中以雄辩的叙述提出的论点并非不可质疑,但它们 invariably 具有挑衅性和洞察力,” 他继续说道。“在史密森尼非裔美国人历史文化国家博物馆的平台上放映这部纪录片,作为从政治/意识形态光谱各个角落引发对其主题的批判性参与的手段,当然是恰当的。”图片:史密森尼历史博物馆充斥着关于种族和性别的觉醒政治信息。
"The arguments advanced via Steele's eloquent narration in the film are not beyond questioning, but they are invariably provocative and insightful," he continued. "It would certainly be an appropriate use of the platform of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture to screen this documentary, as a means of provoking critical engagement with its themes from all corners of the political/ideological spectrum."
当福克斯新闻数字版联系史密森尼非裔美国人历史文化国家博物馆(NMAAHC)寻求评论时,该博物馆未作出回应。
IN PICTURES: HISTORIC SMITHSONIAN MUSEUM PACKED WITH WOKE POLITICAL MESSAGING ON RACE AND GENDER NMAAHC did not respond to a request for comment when reached by Fox News Digital.
“我的父亲谢尔比·斯蒂尔出生于种族隔离时期,数十年来一直在审视美国如何变化、我们走得有多远,以及什么仍在分裂我们。《白人内疚》以他的2006年出版的书为基础,将这项工作搬上了银幕,” 斯蒂尔在提供给福克斯新闻数字版的声明中说道。“我们向史密森尼非裔美国人博物馆提出申请,因为我们认为这种对话应该在那里进行。在一个致力于他亲身经历历史的博物馆中分享他的毕生工作,对我们两人来说意义重大。”“我们的提议仍然有效,我们希望能得到答复。”
"My father, Shelby Steele, was born into segregation and has spent decades examining how America has changed, how far we have come, and what still divides us. ‘White Guilt,’ drawing on his 2006 book, brings that work to the screen," Steele said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital. "We approached the Smithsonian’s African American museum because we believe that conversation belongs there. Sharing his life’s work in a museum dedicated to the history he lived would mean a great deal to both of us." "Our proposal remains open, and we would appreciate an answer."