字号·· | 护眼
彭博社

“被动”投资远非被动:它如何重塑市场Why ‘Passive’ Investing Is Anything but Passive

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

2026年8月12日星期三,美国纽约,一名交易员在纽约证券交易所(NYSE)的交易大厅内工作。在疲软的通胀数据缓解了市场对加息的担忧后,美国股市向历史高点攀升,科技板块领涨。摄影师:Michael Nagle/彭博社A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, US, on Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2026. US stocks advanced toward all-time highs, led by the technology sector, after a subdued inflation reading helped ease interest-rate hike concerns. Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg

被动投资的初衷是跟踪市场,而非塑造市场。但正如梅林·萨默塞特·韦伯和约翰·斯托佩克在第二期节目中所探讨的,被动投资的巨大增长已经改变了其本应追随的市场,正如世界上一些最有价值的公司选择更长时间保持私有。

Passive investing was designed to track the market, not shape it. But as Merryn Somerset Webb and John Stepek explore in the second episode of , the enormous growth of passive investing has changed the market it was built to follow, just as some of the world’s most valuable companies are staying private for longer.

他们以SpaceX为例,考察公共市场与私有市场之间不断变化的关系,并解释为何没有任何投资是真正被动的——投资过程中的某个环节总有人在做决定。随着被动资金流动足以左右市场,梅林和约翰认为,投资者应当确保自己在追求自身财务目标时做出主动决策,而非将这些决定交给陌生人。

Using SpaceX as an example, they examine the changing relationship between public and private markets and why no investment is truly passive — someone is always making a decision somewhere in the process. As passive flows grow powerful enough to move markets, Merryn and John explain why investors should make sure they’re making active decisions in pursuit of their own financial goals, rather than leaving those decisions in the hands of strangers.

梅林谈理财:投资组合重置 第2集(播客)Merryn Talks Money: The Portfolio Reset Episode 2 (Podcast)
阅读媒体原文 ↗