
上个月,在马萨诸塞州剑桥市的奥本山公墓,一座新游客中心举行了剪彩仪式。一队身穿整洁深绿色套头衫的工作人员,在建于1842年、由当地花岗岩砌成的庄严埃及复兴风格主门内侧,与董事会成员和当地政客合影留念。
At a ribbon-cutting for a new visitor center at Mount Auburn cemetery last month in Cambridge, Massachusetts, a platoon of workers in tidy dark green pullovers posed for pictures alongside board members and local politicians, just inside the stately Egyptian Revival main gate, built of local granite in 1842.
活动组织者希望传达的信息十分明确:这里不仅仅是一处墓地。它是一项市政公共设施,身着类似护林员制服的工作人员随时准备欢迎游客,参与各类活动。不仅是观鸟或植物漫步,奥本山公墓最近还举办了瑜伽课、弦乐四重奏音乐会、电影之夜、舞蹈表演,以及在墓碑和陵墓间举行的日落声音疗愈活动。
The event organizers hoped the message would be clear: This place is more than a burial ground. It’s a civic amenity whose park-ranger-like staffers are here to welcome visitors to enjoy all kinds of activities. Not just birdwatching or botanical walks, either. Mount Auburn has recently hosted yoga, string quartet concerts, movie nights, dance performances and a sunset sound bath among the tombstones and mausoleums.
其他公墓同样致力于吸除前来缅怀逝者以外的游客。提供的项目早已超越万圣节墓地游和儿童寻宝游戏,现在包括沉浸式声光秀、5公里跑、婚礼和龙舌兰酒品鉴会。
Other cemeteries similarly strive to attract visitors other than those who come to remember the departed. The offerings have gone far beyond Halloween graveyard tours and kids’ scavenger hunts and now includes immersive sound-and-light shows, 5K races, weddings and tequila tastings.
这种非常规节目安排是北美城市历史公墓的一大趋势。公共空间项目在2019年的一项分析中,确定了六座“多功能公墓”,它们积极鼓励“让生者与死者相聚,不只为葬礼”。华盛顿特区的国会公墓出售狗狗公园通行证;洛杉矶的好莱坞永生公墓举办一年一度的亡灵节庆典,吸引数千人参与。
The unconventional programming is part of a growing trend at historic cemeteries in North American cities. In a 2019 analysis, the Project for Public Spaces identified six “multi-use cemeteries” that actively encourage “ways to bring the living and the dead together for more than a funeral.”Congressional Cemetery in Washington, DC, is selling access to a dog park; Hollywood Forever Cemetery in Los Angeles hosts an annual Día de los Muertos celebration that attracts thousands.
试图让公墓重新成为旅游目的地,呼应了它们最初的角色:一个多世纪前,这些空间曾是公共公园的先驱。如今,随着传统土葬需求下降,公墓欢迎其他类型的访客,既是为了带来急需的收入,也是一种营销手段。希望在当地公墓度过一天散步、听讲座或看音乐会后,一些游客会重新考虑为自己预订一块墓地。
Attempts to make the cemetery a destination again echo their original role: More than a century ago, these spaces served as precursors to public parks. Today, with waning demand for conventional burials, cemeteries are welcoming other kinds of patrons both as a means of bringing in much-needed revenue and an exercise in marketing. The hope is that, after a day of walks, talks or concerts at the local cemetery, some visitors might reconsider putting down a down payment for a plot of their own.
一个基本问题贯穿着这场“回归未来”的实验:虽然许多墓地坐拥黄金地段,拥有幽静的林木景观和绝佳的视野,但人们真的愿意花周末时间在“地下六尺”之间漫步吗?
One basic question lies at the heart of this back-to-the-future experiment: While many cemeteries are on prime real estate with sylvan landscapes and extraordinary views, do people really want to spend their weekends sauntering among those six feet under?
奥本山公墓执行董事马修·斯蒂芬斯表示,如果给它一个机会,会有更多人愿意。
More will if they give it a chance, says Mount Auburn executive director Matthew Stephens.
他说:“人们往往带着对墓地外观和氛围的先入之见而来,结果却发现自己置身于非凡的美景之中,周围是参天大树、鸟鸣声声、野生动物、艺术品和历史遗迹。”这座公墓每年接待14万名访客,其中包括寻找波士顿地区历史景点的游客,“他们对在这里体验到的生机勃勃和连接感感到惊讶。”他补充道,开园近200年后,“我们依然在挑战人们对墓地的固有认知,以及墓地对访客的意义。”
“People often arrive with preconceived notions of what a cemetery should look and feel like, only to find themselves surrounded by extraordinary beauty, towering trees, birdsong, wildlife, art and history,” he said. The cemetery’s 140,000 annual visitors, including tourists seeking out Boston-area historic attractions, “are surprised by the sense of vitality and connection they experience here.”Nearly 200 years after it opened, he added, “we continue to challenge expectations of what a cemetery is and what it means to those who visit.”
奥本山公墓成立于1831年,由马萨诸塞园艺学会合作创办,是城市公墓的先驱。虽然非正规墓地和无名“贫民墓地”在殖民时期就已出现——最臭名昭著的例子之一是纽约市华盛顿广场公园的建立——但小型墓地(通常在教堂院内)逐渐成为被围隔、视为神圣不可侵犯的土地。许多此类墓地保存至今,例如波士顿的国王礼拜堂墓地,如今是该市自由之路的著名打卡点。
Founded in 1831 in collaboration with the Massachusetts Horticultural Society, Mount Auburn was an urban pioneer. While informal graveyards and anonymous “potter’s fields” emerged in colonial times — one of the most infamous examples being the creation of Washington Square Park in New York City — small cemeteries, often in churchyards, became cordoned-off land deemed sacrosanct. Many survive to this day, such as King’s Chapel burial ground in Boston, today a prominent stop on the city’s Freedom Trail.
然而,这些墓地变得拥挤混乱,引发了关于疾病传播和水源污染的公共卫生担忧。这促使市政领袖和城市规划师在19世纪初发起了乡村或花园公墓运动,在城市郊区建立墓地,并采用更具意图性的景观设计,包括起伏的山丘、水景和蜿蜒的小径。这些地方仿照巴黎拉雪兹公墓等欧洲范例建设,四周环以石铁围栏,点缀着宏伟的大门和哥特复兴式建筑。
Those graveyards became overcrowded and disorderly, however, leading to public health concerns about disease and water contamination. That led civic leaders and urban planners to launch the rural or garden cemetery movement in the early 19th century, establishing burial grounds on the outskirts of cities, with a more intentional landscape design of rolling hills, water features and winding paths. These places, modeled after European examples like Paris’s Père Lachaise, were ringed by stone and iron fences and adorned with monumental gates and Gothic Revival structures.
虽然19世纪的乡村公墓建造时规模足以容纳未来的墓位,但很快就被城市化包围了。但这也使它们变得易于到达,最初靠马车,其设计者意在让它们在原本缺乏绿地的城市中供人们休闲娱乐。著名的花园公墓,如布鲁克林的绿木公墓、费城的劳雷尔山公墓、布法罗的森林草坪公墓、芝加哥的格雷斯兰公墓和圣路易斯的贝尔方丹公墓,成为了周日漫步和野餐的热门去处。
Though built to be large enough to accommodate future plots, 19th century rural cemeteries were quickly surrounded by urbanization. But that also made them readily accessible, by horse and carriage initially, and their designers intended them to be used for leisure and recreation in cities that otherwise lacked green space. Notable garden cemeteries such as Green-Wood in Brooklyn, Laurel Hill in Philadelphia, Forest Lawn in Buffalo, Graceland in Chicago, and Bellefontaine in St. Louis became popular spots for Sunday strolls and picnics.
在最近一个阳光明媚的周日下午,奥本山公墓很好地履行了其历史角色。大门处的新欢迎中心主要是一家礼品店,出售诸如《 》和《 》之类的书籍。一批批人徒步出发,探索这座占地175英亩的园区。一些人参加了关于亨利·大卫·梭罗的讲座,跟随正念自然漫步活动,或观看了一场向安葬于此的先驱女性致敬的舞蹈表演。有几人报告称,在糖枫和红橡树燃烧般的色彩中,看到了一对大角鸮。
On a recent sunny Sunday afternoon, Mount Auburn was ably performing its historic role. The new welcome center at the main gate is mostly a gift shop, offering books such as and . A steady stream of people set out on foot to explore the property’s 175 acres. Some dropped in on a lecture on Henry David Thoreau, tagged along for a mindfulness nature walk, or witnessed a dance performance honoring pioneering women buried there. Several reported seeing a pair of great horned owls among the blazing colors of sugar maples and scarlet oaks.
“我有个朋友会带约会对象来这儿,”麻省理工学院的研究员彼得·斯拉特利说道,他背着一个整洁的背包。“这儿很美。我喜欢这份宁静。”长期从事游客服务工作的吉姆·戈尔曼一边分发地图、一边解答关于纪念碑、树木和观鸟热点位置的提问,他说秋天确实吸引了大量人群。一些人是在附近观看了查尔斯河顶峰赛——一项为期三天的赛艇比赛——后过来的。他说,人们喜欢漫步闲逛,并登上华盛顿塔顶,眺望波士顿地区的广阔景色。
“I have a friend who brings dates here,” said Peter Slattery, a researcher at MIT who came equipped with a tidy backpack. “It’s beautiful. I enjoy the serenity.”Fall really brings out the crowds, said Jim Gorman, a longtime visitor services employee who was handing out maps and answering questions about the location of monuments, trees and birdwatching hotspots. Some came over after watching rowing teams compete in the Head of the Charles Regatta, a three-day rowing competition held nearby. People love meandering around and climbing to the top of Washington Tower for the expansive views of the Boston area, he said.
在推动墓地向不同活动开放的努力中,一个固有的问题是,墓地普遍禁止访客做各种事情。奥本山墓地的三明治式广告牌上列出了几项限制,包括禁止骑自行车、滑板车或轮滑;禁止跑步或慢跑;禁止野餐;或许最具挑战性的是——禁止携带宠物。
One inherent problem in the effort to open up cemeteries to different activities is the common prohibition against all the things that visitors are not allowed to do. A sandwich board at Mount Auburn lists several restrictions, including no bikes, scooters, or rollerblades; no running or jogging; no picnicking; and perhaps most challenging — no pets.
斯蒂芬斯表示,管理层“一直在探索让奥本山墓地更加热情好客、更便于到访的方法”,但他补充说,“我们作为墓地的使命将永远排在第一位”。在一些地方,坚守墓地作为纪念场所的首要功能一直是一项挑战。新奥尔良的湖草坪梅泰里墓地开始举办诺拉狗狗救援5公里公路赛之后,有读者致信抱怨说,紧身短裤、欢呼声和沉重的脚步声都显示出缺乏敬畏和尊重。
Stephens said that leadership is “continually exploring ways to make Mount Auburn more welcoming and accessible,” but added that “our cemetery mission will always come first.”Staying true to the primary function of being places of remembrance has been a challenge at some locations. After the Lake Lawn Metairie Cemetery in New Orleans started hosting the NOLA Dogs Race to the Rescue 5K road race, letter-writers to the complained that tight shorts, cheering, and pounding feet all showed a lack of reverence and respect.
“在那些情况下,你总会遭到后人社区的反対,他们会说:‘这片土地除了埋葬死者,你不得用于任何其他用途。’”瑞安·M·塞德曼说。他是一位考古学家兼律师,在新奥尔良路易斯安那州立大学和亚利桑那州立大学讲授有关墓地的课程,并著有《作为土地利用的一种形式,墓地具有独特地抗拒改变的永久性》一书,塞德曼说。
“In those instances you may always have pushback from the descendant community that just says, ‘You shall not use this land for anything but burying dead people,’” said Ryan M. Seidemann, an archaeologist and lawyer who teaches about cemeteries at LSU New Orleans and Arizona State University and is author of As a form of land use, cemeteries have a permanence that is uniquely resistant to alteration, Seidemann said.
与废弃的工厂不同,墓地无法轻易改作新用途;例如,在数十年来抵御任何为修建公路或地铁隧道而进行的侵占之后,墓地的经营者无法出售其部分地产用于开发。通常情况下,他们只能维持现状。(土地稀缺的新加坡则不然,该国曾迁移历史墓地以修建道路和住房项目。)花园式墓地的鼎盛期相对短暂。南北战争后,死亡人数之多促使国家公墓得以发展,这些公墓建在广阔的草坪上,一排排整齐的墓碑毫无公园的伪装。
Unlike abandoned factories, they can’t readily be transformed into new uses; after decades of fending off any incursion to make way for a highway or a subway tunnel, for example, operators of cemeteries cannot sell off portions of their property for development. Typically, they are stuck with what they are. (Not so in land-scarce Singapore, which has relocated historic cemeteries to build roads and housing projects.) The garden cemetery’s heyday was relatively brief. After the Civil War, the sheer number of fatalities prompted the development of national cemeteries, on vast lawns with rows of orderly headstones that had no pretense of being a park.
与此同时,弗雷德里克·劳·奥姆斯特德等景观设计师将公共公园确立为城市地区必不可少的绿洲——供休闲和散步的开阔区域,其景观与花园式墓地相似,只是没有死者。
At the same time, landscape architects such as Frederick Law Olmsted established the public park as an essential oasis in urban areas — open areas for recreation and walking similar to the landscapes of garden cemeteries, but without the dead people.
如今,不断变化的规范已使这些安息之地成为一种历史遗存。一些历史性墓园已经满员,但即便是那些尚有土地可出售未来墓位的墓园,也面临着商业模式严重承压的困境。部分由于对费用的担忧——一场完整的棺葬很容易花费2万美元——美国只有约三分之一的死亡采用棺葬。许多家庭如今更青睐完全不占用土地的其他纪念亲人的方式,比如将骨灰撒在陆地或海上,或采用绿色安葬、自然分解或人体堆肥等环保方式,这些都不需要墓园的正式结构。废弃与疏于管理困扰着许多老墓园——尤其是非裔美国人的历史性墓地。
Today, changing norms have made these sanctuaries a kind of historical relic. Some historic cemeteries have reached capacity, but even those with land left to sell future plots face a business model under severe strain. Due in part to concerns about expense — a full casket interment can easily cost $20,000 — only about one-third of American deaths result in casket burial. Many families now favor other ways to memorialize their loved ones that don’t use land at all, like scattering ashes over land or sea, or environmentally friendly methods such as green burials, natural decomposition or human composting, which don’t require the formal structure of a cemetery. Abandonment and neglect stalk many older cemeteries — particularly historic burial grounds of African Americans.
于是,墓园确实有沦为夕阳产业的风险,与唱片店、付费电话、旅行社和报纸箱一道,成为景观中过时的存在。重拾其19世纪角色的努力是否奏效,尚无定论。今年早些时候发布的一份全国性报告《一桩严肃的事:墓园旅游与项目策划的现状》由公共历史学家兼殡葬顾问阿什琳·里科德·维尔纳编写,报告指出,在报告称已加大新活动力度的近三分之二美国墓园中,访客量略有上升。但同一项调查发现,这些活动带来的收入微乎其微,同时维持员工队伍仍持续困难。
So it is that cemeteries risk literally becoming a dying industry, joining record stores, payphones, travel agencies and newspaper boxes as antiquated features of the landscape. The verdict isn’t in yet on whether the effort to reclaim their 19th-century role is paying off. A national report released earlier this year, “A Grave Affair: The State of Cemetery Tourism & Programming,” prepared by public historian and deathcare consultant Ashlynn Rickord Werner, noted a modest uptick in visitors at the nearly two-thirds of US cemeteries that reported they had ramped up new activities. But the same survey found the events brought in minimal revenue, amid continuing struggles to maintain staff.
维克森林法学院教授、播客《死亡及其他》主持人、《》一书作者坦娅·马什表示,鉴于经济前景预计只会进一步黯淡,像奥本山这样的地方进行重新构想是明智的前进之路。
With the economics only projected to darken further, the reimagining of places like Mount Auburn is a sensible path forward, said Tanya Marsh, professor at Wake Forest Law School, host of the podcast “Death, et seq,” and author of .
“我个人赞成让墓地的社区用途多元化,强调其作为绿地的价值,并为其提供急需的收入,”她说。资不抵债、关闭并最终被毁将是最糟糕的结果。
“I’m personally in favor of diversifying community use of burial places, emphasizing their value as green spaces and giving them the much-needed revenue,” she said. Insolvency, closure and eventual destruction would be the worst possible outcome.
她说:“我认为,墓地变得破败或荒废不符合任何人的利益。”因为这会带来一系列新的环境问题和安全隐患。她还补充说,更何况,“这是对死者的不敬。”
“I don’t think it’s in anyone’s best interest for burial places to become decrepit or abandoned,” as that would create a whole new set of environmental problems and safety hazards, she said. Not to mention, she added, “it is disrespectful to the dead.”