字号·· | 护眼
Mother Jones

美国国家环境保护局正悄然关停其网络档案库The EPA Is Quietly Killing its Web Archive

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

雷切尔·桑塔西耶罗Screenshot of the EPA’s online archive webpage.Rachel Santarsiero

在一处鲜少有人注意的网页更新中,美国国家环境保护局宣布了一项计划,将在年底前停用其在线网络档案库,此举将导致数以万计公开可用的环境资源从网络上被抹去。这一低调的横幅通知与环保局局长李·泽尔丁近期公开撤销该机构的电厂污染标准和联邦甲烷监管体系的做法形成了鲜明对比。

In a little-noticed webpage update, the Environmental Protection Agency has announced a plan to decommission its online web archive at the end of the year, a move that would wipe tens of thousands of publicly available environmental resources from the web. The discreet banner notice comes in stark contrast to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s recent public takedowns of the agency’s power plant pollution standards and federal methane regulatory system.

“环保局的在线档案库使公众能够获取关于各种环境问题和过往政策的信息,这些信息至少可以追溯到20年前,”环境数据与治理倡议组织(EDGI)联合创始人格雷琴·格尔克表示。“这些信息是不可替代的,如果档案库被停用,这些信息将永远丢失。”几十年来,该网络档案库一直是研究人员、立法者、政策制定者以及广大公众无与伦比的资源。

“The EPA’s online archive makes information about a wide variety of environmental issues and past policies available to the public, dating back at least 20 years,” said Gretchen Gehrke, co-founder of the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative (EDGI). “This information is irreplaceable, and if the archive is decommissioned, that information will be lost forever.”For decades, the web archive has been an unparalleled resource for researchers, legislators, policymakers, and the public writ large.

它收录了从情况说明书和环境报告到机构政策变更和监管行动的各种内容,据格尔克称,这使其成为“民主监督”的工具。格尔克十年来一直在追踪脆弱的联邦环境数据的变化。

It houses everything from fact sheets and environmental reports to agency policy changes and regulatory actions, making it a tool for “democratic oversight,” according to Gehrke, who for ten years has been tracking changes to vulnerable federal environmental data. This isn’t the first time the environmental agency has tried to shutter the online web archive.

这并非这家环境机构首次试图关闭在线网络档案库。2022年1月下旬,拜登政府的环保局宣布计划停止该在线存储库,理由是维护费用负担沉重;通过《信息自由法》申请,格尔克得以确定该机构每年花费约200万美元来维护它。一个由环保人士、历史学家和图书馆员组成的联盟迅速谴责了这一决定,EDGI和美国环境史学会等组织称该公告“令人震惊”,并将导致历史记录中出现“巨大空白”。

In late January 2022, the Biden administration EPA announced plans to discontinue the online repository, citing burdensome financial upkeep; through a Freedom of Information Act request, Gehrke was able to determine that the agency spent roughly $2 million a year to maintain it. A coalition of environmentalists, historians, and librarians swiftly condemned the decision, with groups like the EDGI and American Society for Environmental History calling the announcement “alarming” and cause for a “tremendous gap” in the historical record. After five months of public backlash, the EPA acquiesced, in part by announcing it would delay the web archive’s retirement by one year to July 2023.

历经五个月的公众抵制,环保署部分让步,宣布将网络档案的退役时间推迟一年至2023年7月。我当时为以下媒体对此进行了报道:“环保署数字档案获得这一受欢迎的缓期,引发一个重要问题:为何还要继续关闭它的计划?推迟并不能解决档案消亡将对政府透明度和历史记录保存造成的最终损害。反对关闭的组织的担忧,也不会因多运营一年而得到满足。”

I reported on it at the time for : “News of this welcome reprieve for the EPA digital archive raises a significant question: Why continue with plans to shut it down at all? Postponement does not resolve the eventual damage to government transparency and historical record keeping that the archive’s demise will create. And the concern of organizations opposed to closure will not be satisfied by an additional year of operation.”

2023年3月,该机构进一步撤回了其决定,将横幅公告调整为称该在线网络档案只是“退役”,未包含结束日期。此后,在过去三年半中,该在线资源一直默默运行,不再更新,但仍对公众开放。直到几周前,环保署将档案的到期日更新为2026年12月31日。

In March 2023, the agency walked back its decision further still by adjusting the banner announcement to say that the online web archive was simply “retiring”—end date not included. Since then, over the last three and a half years, the online resource has soldiered on quietly, no longer being updated, but still accessible to the public. Until a few weeks ago, when the EPA updated the archive’s expiration date to December 31, 2026.

尽管该档案的可用性历来远非完美——研究人员经常遇到失效链接和极其有限的搜索功能——但该档案收藏了数以万计的环保署文件,可追溯至20世纪90年代,这些文件在其他地方根本找不到。

While the usability of the archive has historically been far from perfect—researchers often encountered dead links and frustratingly limited search capabilities—the archive has held a trove of tens of thousands of EPA documents dating back to the 1990s simply not available elsewhere.

重大的政治环境转折点可以通过该档案追踪,例如小布什总统2003年的“清澈天空计划”,以及奥巴马总统2015年的“清洁能源计划”——这两项计划都试图大幅改变发电厂污染标准。而在特朗普总统第一任期内,当政府删除了环保署大部分气候变化网络资源时,该在线资源至关重要地保留并向公众提供了这些已失效页面的访问。

Major political environmental inflection points could be tracked through the archive, such as President George W. Bush’s 2003 Clear Skies Initiative, or President Barack Obama’s 2015 Clean Power Plan—two initiatives that sought to dramatically transform power plant pollution standards. And during President Trump’s first term, when the administration deleted the majority of the EPA’s climate change web resources, the online resource crucially maintained and made accessible these defunct pages for the public.

这座档案库同时也是环境执法与监督的工具。1989年,在调查发现军事行动已污染北卡罗来纳州勒琼营海军陆战队基地和海军陆战队航空站的土壤、沉积物、地表水和地下水后,美国环保署将该基地列入其“国家优先事项清单”。环保署数十年调查的相关文件被保存在该档案库中,帮助附近居民和基地内的军人消除了对该机构效力的疑虑,并更好地评估化学品暴露情况。

The archival repository has also been a tool for environmental enforcement and oversight. In 1989, after an investigation found that military operations had contaminated the soil, sediment, surface water, and groundwater at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune and the Marine Corps Air Station in North Carolina, the EPA listed the base on its National Priorities List. Documents on the EPA’s decades-long investigation were preserved on the archive and helped nearby residents and service members on base overcome doubts about the agency’s effectiveness and better evaluate chemical exposures.

本周早些时候,特朗普总统表示,如果共和党失去国会多数席位,他将扣留应支付给在勒琼营暴露于污染的军人及其家属的赔偿。

Earlier this week, President Trump said he would withhold compensation due to service members and their families exposed at Camp Lejeune if Republicans lose their majority in Congress.

如今,在美国公众对政府的信任接近历史低点之际,环保署的最新举动可能进一步削弱公众信心。

Now, the EPA’s latest move could further undermine public confidence at a time when trust in government is near historic lows.

“环保署执意要停用其网络档案库,只会继续侵蚀公众信任——而恰恰此时,公众和议员最需要该机构的信息,”自由新闻基金会首位丹尼尔·埃尔斯伯格政府保密问题讲席学者劳伦·哈珀在电子邮件中写道。“切断对记录的便捷获取,迫使研究人员和议员涌向本已不堪重负的《信息自由法》办公室,只为查看曾经公开的记录。”

“The EPA’s insistence on decommissioning its web archive will only continue to erode public trust—at the exact time the public and lawmakers need agency information the most,” Lauren Harper, the first Daniel Ellsberg chair on government secrecy for the Freedom of the Press Foundation, wrote in an email. “Killing easy access to records forces researchers and lawmakers to flood an already underwater FOIA office just to see once-public records.”

最近更新的网页称,历史信息仍可在环保署的“快照集合”中找到,但鉴于第二届特朗普政府对公共数据的讨伐以及对联邦项目和人员经费的大幅削减,很难确定档案库的全部内容、甚至其中一小部分是否还能留存。

The recently updated webpage states that historical information can still be found in the EPA’s “snapshot collections,” but given the second Trump administration’s crusade against public data and evisceration of funds to federal programs and personnel, it’s hard to know for sure if all, or even a fraction, of the archive’s contents will live on.

“环保署应当扩展并系统化该档案库,而不是将其丢弃,并指望三个各自独立的快照就足够了,”格尔克说。环保署未回应置评请求。

“EPA should expand and systematize the archive, not throw it away and expect that three discrete snapshots will suffice,” said Gehrke. The EPA did not respond to a request for comment.

阅读媒体原文 ↗