
我曾在阿富汗帕克蒂卡省靠近巴基斯坦边境的山地险峻地区伯梅尔,领导第10山地师的一支步兵排。我们的任务是美国步兵世代承载的使命:迫近并消灭敌人。
I led a platoon of infantrymen in the 10th Mountain Division in Bermel, a rugged district in Afghanistan’s Paktika province on the Pakistan border. Our mission was the one American infantry carried for generations: close with and destroy the enemy.
我们通过切实做到这一点来保护阿富汗人民:对那些会伤害他们的敌人发动战争。他们的安全由此而来。战争就是这项工作。
We protected the Afghan people by doing exactly that: waging war against the enemy who would have harmed them. Their safety was the result. War was the job.
我排里的每个士兵都知道这一点。在战斗中,战争的迷雾笼罩着一切。计划破产。电台失效。年轻的领导人在没有时间寻求指导的情况下做出生死抉择。支撑他们度过难关的是一个如此清晰的使命,以至于没有人需要去猜测它是什么。
Every soldier in my platoon knew it. In combat, the fog of war settles over everything. Plans break. Radios fail. Young leaders make life-or-death decisions with no time to ask for guidance. What carries them through is a mission so clear that no one has to wonder what it is.
这就是名称至关重要的原因。“战争部”从最高层阐明了使命:我们的军队存在是为了打赢国家的战争。
That is why the name matters. "Department of War" states the mission from the very top: our military exists to fight and win the nation’s wars.
总统唐纳德·特朗普和战争部长皮特·海格塞斯有魄力明确说出这一点。华盛顿的许多人本会对这个名字置之不理。总统在签署授权使用“战争部”名称的行政令时,选择了清晰而非便利。海格塞斯已将这一使命作为该部门一切工作的标准,从恢复武士精神到确保我们的作战人员依然是世界上最具杀伤力的战斗力量。
President Donald Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth had the conviction to say so plainly. Many in Washington would have left the name alone. The president chose clarity over convenience when he signed the executive order authorizing the Department of War name. Hegseth has made that mission the standard for everything the department does, from restoring the warrior ethos to ensuring our warfighters remain the most lethal fighting force in the world.
这是一次恢复,而不是一项发明。战争部于1789年在乔治·华盛顿总统任内成立。在150多年的时间里,它引领美国的军队度过了最具决定性的冲突,从联邦在内战中的胜利到盟军在两次世界大战中的胜利。1947年《国家安全法》重组了军队,1949年,军队领导机构变成了国防部。
This is a restoration, not an invention. The War Department was established in 1789 under President George Washington. For more than 150 years, it carried America’s military through its most consequential conflicts, from Union victory in the Civil War to Allied victory in two world wars. The National Security Act of 1947 reorganized the military, and in 1949, the military leadership became the Department of Defense.
自那以后,世界已经改变。使命没有变。当国家召唤时,我们的作战人员必须随时准备战斗、取胜并凯旋。
The world has changed since then. The mission has not. When the nation calls, our warfighters must be ready to fight, win and come home.
华盛顿明白这一点。他在1790年对国会的首次年度演讲中宣布:“为战争做好准备是维护和平的最有效手段之一。”批评人士称这一改变具有象征意义,甚至没有必要。他们完全本末倒置了。言辞定义使命,而使命推动其他一切。至于我们的盟友,我们欠他们一个关于我们核心使命的清晰声明:打赢战争。句号。清晰的立场能够巩固联盟。模棱两可则会招惹对手来试探联盟。
Washington understood this. In his first annual address to Congress in 1790, he declared, "To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." Critics call the change symbolic, even unnecessary. They have it backward. Words define the mission, and the mission drives everything else. As for our allies, we owe them a clear statement of our core mission: to fight and win wars. Full stop. Clarity strengthens alliances. Ambiguity invites adversaries to test them.
总统已经采取了行动。现在国会必须完成这项工作。众议院和参议院军事委员会都已在今年的国防法案中支持恢复“战争部”的名称。议员们应当将其保留在最终版本中并送交总统办公桌。派遣美国人去战斗的机构的名称应该写入法律,而不仅仅是一道行政令。
The president has acted. Now Congress must finish the job. The House and the Senate Armed Services Committee have both backed restoring the Department of War name in this year’s defense bill. Lawmakers should keep it in the final version and send it to the president’s desk. The name of the institution that sends Americans to fight belongs in law, not just in an executive order.
当然,仅凭一个名字并不能让军队变得更强大。名字是一项承诺,该部门必须每天用实际行动来兑现它。每一项采购决策、训练演习和战略投资都应该回答一个问题:它是否能让我们的作战人员更有能力击败任何威胁?从超级智能和自主系统到先进武器以及一个重新焕发活力的国防工业基础,美国必须不断积累优势以威慑对手,并在必要时将其击败。
Of course, a name alone does not make a military stronger. The name is a commitment, and the department must earn it every day. Every acquisition decision, training exercise and strategic investment should answer one question: Does it make our warfighters more capable of defeating any threat? From superintelligence and autonomous systems to advanced weapons and a revitalized defense industrial base, the United States must keep building the advantages to deter its adversaries and, if necessary, defeat them.
受特朗普关于世界的历史性、非常规视角及其国家安全方法的启发,“堡垒美国”挑战了传统思维,并重新构想了美国必须如何在日益危险的世界中保卫自己。该倡议旨在使我们的军事基地能够独立运作。即使民用基础设施瘫痪,它们也将拥有自己的电源、安全的通信和关键物资。在“堡垒”计划下,我们将促进制造业的发展,建立重要的储备,并确保我们所有的基地即使在遭受攻击时也能完全保持运转。
Fortress America, inspired by Trump’s historic and unconventional view of the world and his approach to national security, challenges traditional thinking and reimagines how America must defend itself in an increasingly dangerous world. The initiative aims to make our military bases able to function independently. They will have their own power sources, secure communications and critical supplies available even if civilian infrastructure breaks down. Under Fortress, we will boost manufacturing, create important reserves and ensure that all of our bases remain completely operational even during an attack.
所有这一切都没有减弱军队的其他职责。我们的部队仍将应对灾难、支持盟友并执行每一项合法任务。而且这一名称并没有改变国会或总统的宪法角色。
None of this diminishes the military’s other responsibilities. Our forces will still respond to disasters, support allies and carry out every lawful mission. And the name changes nothing about the constitutional roles of Congress or the president.
但战争的可能性仍然是美国维持军队的决定性原因。对于将一生奉献给这一使命的士兵、水兵、空兵、海军陆战队员、太空军军人和文职人员来说,这种区别绝非象征意义。他们自愿挺身而出,站在这个国家与敌人之间。当受到召唤时,他们甘冒一切风险。
But the possibility of war remains the defining reason America maintains a military. For the soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, Guardians and civilians who dedicate their lives to this mission, that distinction is not symbolic. They volunteer to stand between this country and its enemies. When called, they risk everything.
我在伯梅尔带领的那些部下正是这样做的。他们理应拥有这样的领导人——从排里到五角大楼,他们明确地告诉部下其使命是什么,并确保他们随时准备好完成使命。今天服役的每一位作战人员都理应获得同样的对待。
The men I led in Bermel did exactly that. They deserved leaders, from the platoon to the Pentagon, who told them plainly what their mission was and made sure they were ready to accomplish it. Every warfighter serving today deserves the same.
力和能力毋庸置疑的军队所保障的持久和平。我们为战争做准备,好让我们的对手永远不敢低估挑起战争的代价。
The goal of American military strength has never been perpetual war. It is lasting peace, secured by a force whose ability to prevail is beyond question. We prepare for war so that our adversaries never doubt the cost of starting one.