印度告诉联合国，改革后的安理会每个常任理事国都必须拥有否决权。新德里表示，不平等的权力将维持五大常任理事国的控制地位，并制造出“二等”成员。
India told the UN that every permanent member of a reformed Security Council must hold veto power. New Delhi said unequal powers would preserve P5 control and create second-class members.
据印度新闻社报道，印度表示，任何创设不拥有否决权的常任理事国的联合国安理会改革，都将使这些新成员沦为“二等”地位，而现有的五个常任理事国则保留对决策的控制权。
India has said any reform of the United Nations Security Council that creates permanent members without veto powers would leave them with “second-class” status while the five existing permanent members retain control over decision-making, news agency Press Trust of India reported.
印度常驻联合国代表哈里什·帕尔瓦塔内尼大使表示，只要否决权条款存在，改革后安理会的所有常任理事国都必须拥有否决权。他说，公平与正义要求每个常任理事国享有平等的权利和责任。
India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni, said all permanent members of a reformed Security Council must have veto powers for as long as the provision exists. He said fairness and justice required equal rights and responsibilities for every permanent member.
据印度新闻社报道，帕尔瓦塔内尼周一表示：“印度在否决权问题上的立场是原则性的且众所周知……我们重申，只要否决权存在，它就必须由改革后安理会的所有常任理事国共同拥有。”
“India’s position on the veto is principled and well known... We reiterate that as long as the veto exists, it must be held by all permanent members of a reformed Council,” Parvathaneni said on Monday, according to PTI.
他在联合国大会政府间谈判关于否决权的全体辩论中表示，通过“创设另一类不拥有否决权的长期成员”来扩大安理会，实际上将使他们成为“二等”成员，且不会改变五大常任理事国的决策动态。
Addressing an Inter-Governmental Negotiations plenary debate on the veto in the UN General Assembly, he said expanding the Security Council by “creating another category of long-term members without the veto effectively makes them ‘second-class’ members and would not change the decision-making dynamic of the P5”.
中国、法国、俄罗斯、英国和美国是15国安理会的五个常任理事国，拥有否决权。安理会还有10个非常任理事国，任期两年。
China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States are the five permanent members of the 15-member Security Council and have veto powers. The Council also has 10 non-permanent members elected for two-year terms.
印度一贯寻求扩大常任和非常任理事国席位。印度警告称，如果改革努力仅集中于增加非常任理事国数量，将接近失败。新德里认为，成立于1945年的安理会不适应21世纪，不能反映当前的地缘政治现实。印度还坚持认为，它理应获得常任理事国席位。
India has consistently sought an expansion of both permanent and non-permanent membership. It has warned that reform efforts would be close to failure if they focused only on increasing the number of non-permanent members. New Delhi has argued that the Council, established in 1945, is not suitable for the 21st century and does not reflect current geopolitical realities. India has also maintained that it deserves permanent membership.
印度正寻求在2028-2029任期内获得安理会非常任理事国席位。巴基斯坦新闻社（PTI）报道，选举定于明年六月进行，届时印度和塔吉克斯坦将竞争亚太集团唯一的席位。印度上一次在安理会任职是2021-2022年度，这是其第八个任期，此前曾在1950-1951、1967-1968、1972-1973、1977-1978、1984-1985、1991-1992和2011-2012年度担任席位。
India is seeking a non-permanent seat for the 2028-29 term. Elections are scheduled for June next year, when India and Tajikistan will contest the sole seat allocated to the Asia-Pacific Group, PTI reported. India last served on the Council in 2021-22, its eighth term, after holding seats in 1950-51, 1967-68, 1972-73, 1977-78, 1984-85, 1991-92 and 2011-12.
印度的立场是，安理会改革必须扩大两类成员资格，并赋予所有常任理事国平等权力，包括在否决权仍然存在的情况下保持否决权。
India’s position is that Security Council reform must expand both categories of membership and give all permanent members equal powers, including the veto for as long as it remains in place.