斯德哥尔摩国际和平研究所（SIPRI）周二发布的一份报告称，官方发展援助与全球发展及人道主义需求之间不断扩大的差距，可能对人类安全和政治稳定造成严重后果。
A widening gap between official development assistance and global development and humanitarian needs could have serious consequences for human security and political stability, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said in a report released Tuesday.
报告指出，只需将用于增加军费开支的资源中的一小部分转用，即可弥补这一差距。
The report said the gap could be closed with only a small fraction of the resources being directed toward increased military spending.
根据SIPRI数据，2025年全球军费开支达到创纪录的2.9万亿美元，相当于全球国内生产总值的2.5%。
Global military expenditures reached a record $2.9 trillion in 2025, equivalent to 2.5% of global gross domestic product, according to SIPRI data.
与此同时，根据经济合作与发展组织（OECD）的数据，官方发展援助（ODA）自2024年以来有所下降。
At the same time, official development assistance (ODA) has declined since 2024, based on figures from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
SIPRI表示，核心官方发展援助支出自2021年起开始停滞不前，这一趋势曾因2022年战争爆发后对乌克兰援助增加，以及捐助国在接待难民方面的支出上升而暂时被掩盖。
SIPRI said core official development assistance spending began to stagnate in 2021, a trend temporarily obscured by increased aid to Ukraine following the start of the war in 2022 and higher spending by donor countries on hosting refugees.
报告称，核心官方发展援助支出降幅最大的领域是经济基础设施和卫生。
The largest declines in core official development assistance spending have been seen in economic infrastructure and health, according to the report.
SIPRI军费开支与军火生产项目研究员肖亮（Xiao Liang，音译）表示：“欧洲及其他地区的富裕国家为应对日益上升的军事威胁，大幅增加了军费开支。”
“Wealthy states in Europe and beyond have sharply increased their military spending in response to rising military threats,” said Xiao Liang, a researcher with SIPRI's Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program.
“但这与其他预算项目的大幅削减相吻合，其中包括发展援助和人道主义援助。这可能给依赖援助的民众和国家带来广泛的不安全感。”“关键人道主义和发展援助持续撤离” 即使需求“正在增长”SIPRI研究人员估计，视武装冲突、自然灾害及其他因素的发展情况而定，2028年官方发展援助资金需求可能高达3260亿美元。
“But this has coincided with deep cuts in other budget lines, including development and humanitarian aid. This can create widespread insecurity for people and states that rely on aid.”'Sustained withdrawal of vital humanitarian and development assistance' even as needs 'are growing' SIPRI researchers estimate that official development assistance funding needs could reach as much as $326 billion in 2028, depending on developments related to armed conflicts, natural disasters, and other factors.
这将留下高达1790亿美元的潜在资金缺口，超过预计2028年将承诺的官方发展援助总额。
That would leave a potential funding gap of $179 billion, exceeding the total amount of official development assistance expected to be committed in 2028.
“我们正处于关键人道主义和发展援助持续撤减之中，而对这类援助的需求却在增长，”斯德哥尔摩国际和平研究所（SIPRI）军费开支与军火生产项目主任南·田（Nan Tian）表示。
“We are in the middle of a sustained withdrawal of vital humanitarian and development assistance at a time when needs for it are growing,” said Nan Tian, the director of SIPRI's Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program.
他补充说，预计的资金缺口仅占分配给军费开支的额外资源的一小部分，满足未来的官方发展援助需求依然负担得起。
He added that the projected funding gap represents only a fraction of the additional resources being allocated to military spending and that meeting future official development assistance needs remains affordable.
该报告考察了德国和英国近期的发展援助与军费开支政策，发现各国政府在为削减官方发展援助辩护时，曾引用为更高军费开支筹资的必要性。
The report examined recent development aid and military spending policies in Germany and the UK, finding that governments had cited the need to finance higher military spending when justifying cuts to official development assistance.
然而，SIPRI表示，援助削减对计划中的军费增加仅作出了微不足道的贡献。
However, SIPRI said the reductions in aid made only a marginal contribution to planned increases in military expenditure.
“随着国际合作减弱、地缘政治紧张局势升级和军事化加剧，各国寻求投资自身安全是可以理解的，”梁（Liang）说。
“With the weakening of international cooperation and rising geopolitical tensions and militarization, it is understandable that states are seeking to invest in their security,” Liang said.
“但仅靠军事能力无法保证安全。发展援助能够解决不安全的长期根源，因此应被视为对军费开支的补充，而非与之竞争。”
“But military capabilities alone do not guarantee security. Development aid can address long-term drivers of insecurity and should therefore be seen as complementing military spending, not competing with it.”