AI正在将原住民艺术转化为“Temu垃圾”，皮坦扬贾塔拉艺术家萨莉·斯凯尔斯表示。
AI is taking First Nations art and turning it into "Temu slop", the Pitjantjatjara artist Sally Scales has said.
斯凯尔斯是澳大利亚国家美术馆原住民咨询小组的主席，她表示，这项技术正在削弱原住民艺术家的主体性及其作品的真实性，并构成对文化知识的“盗窃”。
Scales, the chair of the National Gallery of Australia's First Nations advisory group, said the technology is undermining the agency of First Nations artists and the authenticity of their work and represents a "a theft" of cultural knowledge.
尽管总理安东尼·阿尔巴尼斯曾承诺保护澳大利亚创作者免受版权盗窃，司法部长米歇尔·罗兰也表示“没有削弱版权保护的计划”，但AI已经在未经补偿的情况下，对包括凯莉·米诺格和尼克·凯夫在内的知名澳大利亚艺术家的作品进行了训练。
Despite prime minister Anthony Albanese's vow to protect Australian creatives from copyright theft, and the attorney general, Michelle Rowland, saying there are "no plans to weaken copyright protections", AI has already been trained – without compensation –on the works of well known Australian artists including Kylie Minogue and Nick Cave.
但专家尤其担心原住民文化和知识产权（ICIP）面临的风险，在AI公司可以将网上找到的任何内容（包括包含神圣和文化知识的歌曲和绘画）一网打尽的世界里，AI已经篡改了作品，删除了署名，然后将其出售，澳大利亚视觉艺术家最高机构表示，这一行为正在造成“文化和经济损害”。
But experts are particularly worried about the risks to Indigenous cultural and intellectual property (ICIP) and in a world where AI companies can hoover up anything that may be found online, including songs and paintings that include sacred and cultural knowledge. AI has altered work, removed names and then been sold, an act the peak body for Australian visual artists said was causing "cultural and economic harm".
在Temu、Shein和亚马逊等网站上的搜索显示，有无数作品被描述为原住民绘画，以及杯垫和瓶套等带有原住民风格设计的物品，大多没有标注任何艺术家的署名。“名字里就写着，它是人工的，”斯凯尔斯说。
Searches on sites including Temu, Shein and Amazon reveal countless works described as Aboriginal paintings, as well as items such as coasters and stubby holders bearing Aboriginal-style designs, mostly without attribution to any artist.
“我见过一些作品，看着它们，我会想知道它们是否经过了原住民社区或某个人之手，还是只是他们随便拼凑出来的某种通用东西。”
"It's in the name, it's artificial," Scales said.
“这剥夺了艺术家的主体性。它夺走了作品的真实性，因为作品并非出自与之有联系的人之手……艺术家的家族血缘不在其中，生活经验也不在其中。”新南威尔士大学法学院知识产权专家凯西·鲍雷教授表示，五分之一的创作者已经面临版权侵权问题，而无需人工智能介入。但她补充说，当创作者是原住民时，问题会变得更加复杂，“部分原因是缺乏对所有权的控制以及对原住民文化的尊重”。
"I've seen some works where I look at it and wonder if they've gone through a First Nations community or a person, or if it's something generic that they've whipped up.
她举了一个例子：一个组织付费使用原住民艺术作品或原住民本人的图像，随后未经许可，利用人工智能对这些图像进行“更新”或再利用。
"It's a theft of the agency of the artist. It rips the authenticity out of it, because it's not been made by anyone who has the connection … the artist's family lineage is not there, the lived experience is not there." Prof Kathy Bowrey, an intellectual property specialist from UNSW Law, said one in five creators already had problems with copyright infringement without AI. But she added the issues became even more complex when the creators were First Nations people, "partly because of lack of control over ownership and respect for Aboriginal culture".
“企业客户可以付一次钱，然后未经授权制作原住民衍生作品，未经同意使用艺术家的面容，”她说。
She gave an example of an organisation paying to use artwork or images of Aboriginal people themselves, then later using AI to "update" or repurpose those images without permission.
“这不仅让[艺术家]失去了回头业务，而且当他们创作新作品时，还要与人工智能竞争。”国家视觉艺术协会（Nava）表示，原住民数据主权“承认原住民民族有权对其数据、文化材料和知识行使权威”。
"The corporate client can pay you once and then make unauthorised Aboriginal derivative work and use the faces of the artists without consent," she said.
在向联合人工智能特别委员会调查提交的意见中，Nava指出了乌萨西和梅里亚姆律师特里·简克的工作。简克是国际原住民文化和知识产权权威，她“记录了人工智能抓取原住民艺术中心网站、删除艺术家姓名并篡改其作品的行为”。
"Not only do [the artists] not get the repeat business, but when they go to make new work they're competing against an AI." The National Association for the Visual Arts (Nava) said Indigenous data sovereignty "recognises the right of First Nations peoples to exercise authority over their data, cultural material and knowledge".
简克还警告了更广泛的风险：人工智能在不顾及准确性或适当使用的情况下复制文化知识。
In a submission to the joint select committee inquiry on artificial intelligence, Nava pointed to work by the Wuthathi and Meriam lawyer Terri Janke, an international authority on Indigenous cultural and intellectual property, who has "documented AI scraping Indigenous art centre websites, removing artists' names and altering their work".
提交文件称：“Nava成员还对AI生成的‘原住民风格’图像和设计表示担忧，这些图像和设计模仿了社区特有的技法、故事、图案和标记制作。”“这些图像可以作为原住民作品或原住民风格作品展示和销售，传播错误信息，造成文化和经济损害，并与原住民艺术家的作品竞争。”
Janke has also warned of the broader risk of AI reproducing cultural knowledge without regard to its accuracy or appropriate use.
鲍雷和一位同事、创意技术专家奥利弗·鲍恩副教授提出了他们所谓的政策草案。鲍雷表示，他们根据政府迄今所说明的参数起草了该政策草案。
"Nava members have also raised concerns about AI-generated 'Aboriginal-style' images and designs that imitate community-specific techniques, stories, motifs and mark-making," the submission said. "These images can be presented and sold as Indigenous or Indigenous-inspired work, spreading misinformation, causing cultural and economic harm and competing with work by First Nations artists." Bowrey and a colleague, creative technologies expert associate professor Oliver Bown, have proposed what they call a Bowrey said they wrote the draft policy based on the parameters of what the government has said so far.
总检察长发言人表示，澳大利亚创意人员“世界一流”，政府致力于支持他们。
A spokesperson for the attorney general said Australian creatives were "world class" and that the government was committed to supporting them.
发言人说：“这就是为什么我们继续与创作者、媒体组织和人工智能公司就一系列选项进行磋商，以确保任何未来的版权变更都能提供有意义的控制权和公平的补偿。”
"That's why we're continuing to consult with creators, media organisations and AI companies on a range of options to ensure any future copyright changes deliver meaningful control and fair compensation," the spokesperson said.