独家：在一起涉嫌儿童强奸案中引用不存在的判例，令困扰法庭程序的数十起AI相关错误再增一例。
Exclusive: Nonexistent precedent cited in alleged child rape case adds to dozens of AI-related errors plaguing court proceedings A senior crown prosecutor acting in a high court case cited an imaginary legal precedent in an error that has sparked fresh concerns about AI hallucinations infecting the justice system.
法庭文件披露，代表皇家检控署（CPS）出庭的资深检察官Ravinder Dhillon在一起关于是否应起诉一名强奸其幼年妹妹的儿童的争议中，引用了一个完全捏造的案例，此举引发了人们对AI幻觉侵蚀司法系统的新担忧。
Ravinder Dhillon, representing the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), referenced an entirely made-up case during a dispute over whether a child should be prosecuted for the rape of his younger sister, court documents have revealed.