字号 ·· | 护眼
thenextweb

人工智能商业时代:7位电商领袖谈仍待解决的问题

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

你会信任人工智能(AI)来管理你的亚马逊店铺吗?这样的未来可能已经不远了。但真正的AI转型不仅仅意味着使用那些能够“填补空白”的AI工具;更重要的是需要构建一个基础设施层,让AI能够自主创建和管理自己的工作流程。我们采访了7位电子商务行业的资深人士,询问在AI真正能够运营在线店铺之前,哪些环节还存在问题、哪些方面需要改进。

Would you trust an AI agent to run your Amazon store? That future may be near. But true AI transformation requires moving beyond “gap-filling” AI tools. It requires building an infrastructure layer that lets AI agents create and manage their own workflows. We asked 7 e-commerce industry veterans what’s still broken and what needs to change before AI agents can truly operate online stores.

过去几年里,关于AI转型的承诺层出不穷,电子商务领域的SaaS软件以及亚马逊商品列表优化工具的市场竞争也日益激烈。那么,为什么电子商务机构和企业仍然需要花费大量时间来手动管理他们的店铺呢?

For the past few years, promises of AI transformation have flooded the e-commerce industry. The market for e-commerce SaaS and Amazon listing optimization tools has never been more crowded. So why are e-commerce agencies and large sellers still spending so much time operating their stores manually?

当我们私下与这些电子商务机构的高管交流时,会发现一个有趣的现象:某个AI工具发现了问题,另一个工具会提出解决方案,但最终还是需要人类来判断这些方案是否合理、是否需要实施,并检查这些改变是否真正有效。尽管有各种“辅助工具”和“AI助手”的帮助,管理价值数百万美元的亚马逊店铺的日常运营工作仍然依赖于人工操作,而且这些操作分散在数十个不同的软件系统中进行。

Speak off-the-record to the executives running e-commerce agencies and you start seeing an interesting pattern. One AI tool spots the problem, another recommends a fix, and a human still has to figure out what matters. That human decides whether the recommendation makes sense, makes the change and checks whether it all worked. Despite multiple “copilots” and “AI assistants,” the day-to-day operations of managing multi-million-dollar Amazon portfolios remain manual. They stay fragmented across dozens of tools.

“电子商务机构的问题不再在于缺乏软件,而恰恰在于软件太多、过于复杂,”Jinnify.ai的首席执行官兼创始人Cyril Golub说道。Jinnify.ai是一家介于AI工具与电子商务系统之间的中间层平台,旨在帮助提升运营效率。

Speak off-the-record to the executives running e-commerce agencies and you start seeing an interesting pattern. One AI tool spots the problem, another recommends a fix, and a human still has to figure out what matters. That human decides whether the recommendation makes sense, makes the change and checks whether it all worked. Despite multiple “copilots” and “AI assistants,” the day-to-day operations of managing multi-million-dollar Amazon portfolios remain manual. They stay fragmented across dozens of tools.

Cyril Golub同时也是一位风险投资家,曾担任Aheadworks的首席执行官兼联合创始人。Aheadworks是一家电子商务软件公司,他在2019年带领该公司成功完成了上市。二十多年来,他一直密切关注着整个行业的科技发展动态。

Too Much Software“E-commerce agencies don’t suffer from a lack of software anymore. In many cases, they suffer from too much of it,” says Cyril Golub, CEO & Founder of Jinnify.ai, an operations layer between AI agents and e-commerce systems. Cyril Golub is an angel investor and the former CEO and co-founder of Aheadworks. Aheadworks is an e-commerce software company he led to a successful exit in 2019. He has watched the industry’s tech stack evolve for over two decades.

“每一个新的 SaaS 仪表板或 AI 辅助工具都可能成为新的负担:又是一个需要学习的界面,另一条需要解读的建议信息流,又是一个人类必须将其与实际业务成果联系起来的工具。”为了弄清楚当前 AI 商业工具在哪些方面存在不足,以及下一代 AI 基础设施应该朝哪个方向发展,我们采访了电子商务机构的首席执行官和行业资深人士。最终我们绘制出了一张描绘 2026 年业务运营状况的“问题地图”。这张地图指出了现有工具在四个方面存在的瓶颈,并提出了用原生 AI 系统替代这些工具的解决方案。

“Every new SaaS dashboard or AI copilot can become another burden: another interface to learn, another stream of recommendations to interpret, another tool a human has to connect to the actual business outcome.” To map out where the existing AI commerce tools are failing today and where the next generation of AI infrastructure must go, we interviewed e-commerce agency CEOs and industry veterans. The result is an operational “pain map” for 2026. It shows four bottlenecks where legacy tools stall, and the blueprint for the native AI systems replacing them.

  1. 目录管理仍然需要人工干预当外界人士想到亚马逊的优化工作时,他们通常会想到关键词研究或产品列表的更新。但如果你询问电子商务机构的员工,他们真正花费大量时间的工作是什么,答案其实并不那么“光彩夺目”:那就是无休止的目录管理任务。
  1. Catalog Firefighting Is Still a Human Job When industry outsiders think of Amazon optimization, they picture keyword research or product listing updates. Ask an agency operator what actually consumes their team’s time most. The answer is far less glamorous: relentless catalog firefighting.

“对我们来说,最大的瓶颈并不是 PPC(按点击付费广告)或关键词研究,而是处理亚马逊 Seller Central 系统中的各种问题,”电子商务机构 Desverto 的创始人 Sam Shah 解释道。“每天都会出现各种问题:被隐藏的 ASIN(产品编号)、损坏的产品信息、目录数据被覆盖、8541 错误、危险品/文件相关的问题等等。像 Data Dive 这样的工具虽然能够很好地发现问题,但它们只能停留在发现问题阶段;真正解决问题往往需要联系亚马逊的卖家支持部门或品牌注册系统,进行多次跟进处理,而且还需要有人了解该账户的历史记录。”亚马逊的后端系统由大量的平面文件、品牌注册数据以及不断变化的分类模板组成,因此现有的 SaaS 工具只能完成一半的工作。这些工具虽然能够发出警报,但最终还是需要人工来处理这些问题。

“The biggest bottleneck for us is not PPC or research, it’s Seller Central firefighting,” explains Sam Shah, Founder of e-commerce agency Desverto. “Every day something breaks: suppressed ASINs, broken variations, catalog overwrites, 8541 errors, hazmat/document issues, etc. Tools like Data Dive are great at detecting problems, but they stop there. The actual fix often needs Seller Support/Brand Registry cases, multiple follow-ups, and someone who understands the account history.” Amazon’s backend is a labyrinth of flat files, Brand Registry overrides, and changing category templates. Because of that, today’s SaaS stack only completes half the job. It sounds the alarm, but leaves human operators to put out the fire.

“最大的未解决瓶颈在于如何将分散的目录数据转化为安全、准确且可扩展的执行方案,”My Amazon Guy的创始人Steven Pope指出。My Amazon Guy是一家总部位于美国的电子商务机构,负责管理450个品牌。Steven Pope补充说:“现有的工具虽然能够识别被隐藏的商品信息、缺失的属性、关键词缺失的问题、积压的库存或数据不一致的问题,但卖家和电商机构仍需要自己来完成最困难的部分:确定问题的真正根源、判断哪些修改是安全的、处理相互矛盾的数据信息,并在修改商品信息时确保不会破坏商品之间的父子关系(即商品之间的层级结构)、保持数据的索引完整性以及确保商品符合亚马逊的发布要求。”

“The biggest unsolved bottleneck is turning fragmented catalog data into safe, correct, and scalable execution,” notes Steven Pope, founder of My Amazon Guy, a US-based e-commerce agency managing 450 brands. “Existing tools can identify suppressed listings, missing attributes, keyword gaps, stranded inventory, or variation issues, but they still leave sellers and agencies doing the hard part: determining the true root cause, knowing which edit is safe, navigating conflicting contribution data, and pushing changes without breaking a parent-child relationship, indexing, compliance status, or retail readiness.” Exception Management“For a seller managing a large catalog or multiple client accounts, catalog work is not just ‘fill in missing fields.’ It is a constantly changing system involving flat files, Seller Central, brand registry, compliance documentation, category templates, image requirements, inventory feeds, and Amazon’s sometimes inconsistent catalog rules. The actual bottleneck is exception management: thousands of small issues that each require context, judgment, evidence, and follow-through. Most SaaS tools surface the problem; they don’t reliably own the resolution end to end,” says Steven Pope.

对于那些需要管理大量商品或多个客户账户的卖家来说,目录管理工作不仅仅是简单地“填写缺失的信息”而已;它实际上是一个不断变化的系统,涉及多种数据源(如平面文件、Seller Central平台、品牌注册信息、合规性文档、商品分类模板、图片要求以及亚马逊有时会变化的目录规则)。Steven Pope认为:“真正的瓶颈在于异常情况的管理——这些小问题每一个都需要具体的背景信息、判断力以及后续的处理措施。大多数SaaS工具只能发现问题,却无法提供可靠的解决方案。”

  1. AI Tools Are Missing a Bigger Business Picture
  1. 人工智能工具缺乏对整体业务状况的全面理解另一位电商机构CEO指出的问题是:大多数工具都只关注单一的指标或任务,而忽略了整个业务的整体情况。

Another issue agency CEOs point to is that most tools focus on one metric or task without considering the bigger business picture.

“我试用过很多工具,但我的结论是:大多数电子商务SaaS和AI工具都缺乏对业务整体的控制能力,”总部位于英国的电商机构Sellonics的CEO Adnan Aslam说道。“这些工具确实能帮助你优化营销活动,但最终这些优化措施并不能与品牌的整体目标相衔接。”Adnan认为,下一代人工智能商业工具必须能够同时理解所有运营领域的状况,包括PPC广告预算、库存水平、利润率、竞争对手排名以及品牌所处的生命周期阶段等。

“I tried multiple tools, but I think the main bottom line is that across most e-commerce SaaS and AI tools, the control layer is really missing,” says Adnan Aslam, CEO of UK-based Amazon agency Sellonics. “The way you want to optimize your campaigns is something they provide, but eventually, it doesn’t connect with the bigger brand goals.” Adnan mentions that the next-gen AI commerce tools would have to understand the full spectrum of operational areas simultaneously. That includes PPC budgets, inventory levels, profit margins, competitor rankings and current brand lifecycle stages.

“当产品刚刚上线时,如果你想通过某些关键词来提升产品的排名,直接让人工智能来处理这些关键词的排名工作是不可能的——因为产品还没有用户评价,转化率也会很低,而且你还在与那些已经从事销售业务数十年的商家竞争。理想的人工智能应该能够理解某个品牌在特定发展阶段所能实现的目标,以及实际存在的各种限制。”阿德南·阿斯拉姆(Adnan Aslam)补充道。

“When there is a new launch and you want to rank for certain keywords, if you just command AI that we want to rank for those keywords, it’s not even possible because you just launched: you don’t have reviews, your conversion will be low, and you’re competing with people who have been selling for decades. An ideal AI would need to understand what’s possible for a certain brand at a certain stage and what the realistic limitations are,” adds Adnan Aslam.

  1. 数据量越大,并不意味着决策质量就越高随着大型语言模型(LLMs)的普及,许多电子商务软件开发者将它们与亚马逊的“销售合作伙伴API”(Selling Partner API,简称SP-API)进行了集成。然而,让大型语言模型直接访问原始的店铺数据,并没有带来理想的、能够自主管理店铺运营的解决方案。
  1. More Data Doesn’t Mean Better Decisions As Large Language Models (LLMs) went mainstream, many e-commerce software developers connected them to Amazon’s Selling Partner API (SP-API). However, giving an LLM access to raw store data hasn’t yielded an ideal autonomous account manager.

实际上,将非结构化数据输入到大型语言模型中会导致推荐结果出现混乱或错误,从而影响在线店铺的运营效果。这些模型缺乏对店铺运营环境的深入了解;它们仍然无法区分那些看似无关紧要的日志警告,以及那些可能对店铺收入造成严重威胁的问题(这些问题甚至可能导致店铺的运营被暂停)。

In practice, feeding unstructured data into an LLM creates prompt noise and hallucinated AI recommendations that can hurt online store performance. Frontier models lack native operational context. They still can’t distinguish between minor log warnings and serious revenue threats or issues that may even trigger catalog suspension.

“数据访问的问题已经解决了;我们可以通过 MCP(Amazon Marketing Platform)连接到亚马逊的数据库,从而从任何地方获取我们需要的任何信息,”AMZ Bees的创始人兼首席执行官Klaidas Siuipys解释道。AMZ Bees是一家总部位于立陶宛维尔纽斯的、提供全方位亚马逊PPC(Pay-Per-Click)广告服务及账户管理服务的公司。“问题在于:并非所有获取到的数据都对我们有用。如果系统接收到了所有数据,它就会使用所有这些数据……真正关键的是判断力:需要知道哪些数据对当前账户、当前问题或当前情况至关重要,然后舍弃其余的数据。目前,这种数据筛选工作仍需要人工来完成。”

“Access is solved; we connect via MCP and can pull whatever we want from wherever we want,” explains Klaidas Siuipys, Founder and CEO of AMZ Bees, a full-service Amazon PPC and account management agency based in Vilnius, Lithuania. “The problem is that everything is not what you need. A system that receives the full dump will use all of it… The real work is judgment: knowing which data matters for this account, this question, this moment, and leaving the rest out. Right now, that filtering is the human part of the job.”

Jinnify的首席执行官兼创始人Cyril Golub也指出了通用人工智能在操作层面存在的局限性:“虽然强大的大型语言模型(LLM)具备很强的处理能力,但它本身并不能替代电子商务运营商。用这类模型来处理每一条原始的商业数据,就相当于让一位博士用Excel来做简单的算术运算。实际上,我们需要专门的软件来处理数据、为商家的营销策略提供支持、明确代理可以修改哪些内容、制定执行流程,并通过反馈机制来验证决策是否正确。”

Cyril Golub, CEO & Founder of Jinnify, emphasizes this operational limit of generic AI too: “A powerful LLM is not an e-commerce operator by itself. Using a frontier model to process every raw commerce record is like hiring a PhD to do arithmetic in Excel. You need deterministic software to prepare the data, persistent memory for the merchant’s strategy, permissions around what the agent may change, execution rails, and then a feedback loop to see whether the decision was right.” 4. The Gap Between AI Recommendations and Action The biggest problem with today’s AI commerce tools is that they can recommend what to do. But they often can’t actually execute these actions. A merchant still has toto Seller Central, copy and paste recommendations, submit support tickets, and come back later to see if the fix worked.

AI推荐与实际执行之间的差距当今AI商业工具最大的问题在于:它们虽然能够给出建议,但往往无法直接执行这些建议。商家仍然需要通过Seller Central(亚马逊的卖家管理平台)手动复制并粘贴这些建议,提交支持请求,然后等待一段时间才能确认这些建议是否真正起到了作用。

“The biggest challenge with AI in commerce is integrating the AI-generated recommendation into the operational system around the business,” notes Antons Sapriko, CEO of Scandiweb, one of the largest e-commerce software agencies in Europe. “If people still have to move between tools, validate outputs manually and execute changes themselves, you haven’t fundamentally changed the operating model, but just accelerated one step within it. The real opportunity is to move from AI as a decision-support layer to AI as an execution layer, where agents can access the relevant context, operate within defined permissions, interact with systems of record and ultimately take action on behalf of the business.”

“在商业领域,人工智能面临的最大挑战在于如何将人工智能生成的推荐结果整合到企业的运营系统中,”欧洲最大的电子商务软件公司之一 Scandiweb 的首席执行官 Antons Sapriko 如是说。“如果用户仍然需要在不同工具之间切换、手动验证推荐结果并自行执行相关操作,那么实际上并没有从根本上改变企业的运营模式,而只是加快了某些流程的运行速度而已。真正的机会在于将人工智能从‘决策支持层’提升为‘执行层’——让员工能够在明确的权限范围内获取相关信息、与企业的各种系统进行交互,并最终代表企业采取实际行动。”

“The biggest challenge with AI in commerce is integrating the AI-generated recommendation into the operational system around the business,” notes Antons Sapriko, CEO of Scandiweb, one of the largest e-commerce software agencies in Europe. “If people still have to move between tools, validate outputs manually and execute changes themselves, you haven’t fundamentally changed the operating model, but just accelerated one step within it. The real opportunity is to move from AI as a decision-support layer to AI as an execution layer, where agents can access the relevant context, operate within defined permissions, interact with systems of record and ultimately take action on behalf of the business.”

电子商务平台 Ecwid 的创始人 Ruslan Fazlyev 表示:“我们花了二十年时间来帮助企业更轻松地开展在线销售业务;下一阶段的目标则是让企业能够更轻松地在线运营。人工智能可以成为商家们的新‘操作工具’,但决定这一转变能否真正提升商家竞争力、还是仅仅增加他们的依赖性的,关键在于背后的基础设施。”我们采访的电子商务从业者们提出了他们对理想人工智能商业解决方案的构想:理想的人工智能系统应该能够直接采取行动,并根据业务风险的不同为商家提供不同级别的控制权限,同时全面理解相关的业务背景。下一代人工智能工具不应仅仅是一个提供推荐建议的界面,而应该具备直接执行操作的能力。

Ruslan Fazlyev, founder of e-commerce store platform Ecwid (which he built to a $500M exit), shares: “We’ve spent two decades making it easier for businesses to sell online. The next phase is about making it easier for businesses to operate online. AI could become a new operational interface for merchants, but the underlying infrastructure will determine whether that shift actually gives merchants more leverage or simply creates another layer of dependency.” Blueprint of an Ideal AI Commerce Solution for Sellers E-commerce operators we interviewed described what they believe the ideal AI system should look like to solve these four problems. The next generation of AI tools should not be another dashboard that simply gives recommendations. It should be able to take action directly. It should also give businesses different levels of control depending on the risk involved, while fully understanding the relevant business context.

My Amazon Guy的创始人Steven Pope指出:“我理想中的、基于人工智能的目录管理系统应该像一支经验丰富的亚马逊目录管理团队一样运作——具备全面的视野、持久的数据存储能力以及相应的执行能力。该系统能够收集所有ASIN(商品编号)、SKU(库存单位编号)、产品变体信息、商品列表的相关数据、库存状况、品牌资产信息、合规性文档、历史变更记录以及业务绩效数据,并根据收入风险、转化潜力、库存曝光度以及账户健康状况等因素来持续调整工作优先级。”

Steven Pope, founder of My Amazon Guy, notes: “My ideal AI-native catalog system would operate like an experienced Amazon catalog operations team that has complete visibility, persistent memory and the ability to act. It would ingest every ASIN, SKU, parent-child variation, listing contribution, inventory position, case log, brand asset, compliance document, historical change and performance signal, then continuously prioritize work based on revenue risk, conversion upside, inventory exposure, and account-health risk.”

Steven Pope进一步解释说:“该系统的核心功能是一个‘目录控制中心’:它不仅会提醒我某个ASIN被屏蔽或某个产品变体存在问题,还会用通俗易懂的语言说明问题的原因,展示相关证据,推荐最佳的解决方案,并预估该解决方案对业务的影响。系统可以在预设的规则范围内自动执行修复操作,或者准备相应的文件上传材料以供审批。最重要的设计原则是‘基于信任的自动化’——低风险、可逆的变更可以自动执行;中等风险的变更需要等待审批;而高风险操作(如产品变体的重新调整、合规性变更或对重要ASIN的修改)则必须经过人工审核,并明确说明其可能带来的后果。”

As Steven Pope puts it: “The key feature would be a ‘catalog control center’ that doesn’t merely alert me that an ASIN is suppressed or a variation is broken. It would explain the cause in plain English, show the evidence, recommend the best fix, estimate the expected business impact, and either execute the fix automatically within predefined guardrails or prepare the exact file upload, case, or appeal for approval.” “The most important design principle would be confidence-based automation. Low-risk, reversible changes could be executed automatically; medium-risk changes could be queued for approval; and high-risk actions, such as variation restructuring, compliance changes, or edits to major ASINs, would require human signoff with a clear explanation of consequences,” says Steven Pope.

检测、诊断、修复、验证、升级:Sam Shah对理想AI解决方案的描述 Sam Shah这样描述理想的AI解决方案:“我所需要的AI系统应该具备检测、诊断、修复、验证以及必要时的升级功能,并且所有操作都需要经过人工审核(尤其是涉及风险的情况)。如果我能首先实现某个工作流程的自动化,那么那些潜在的风险点就能被及时发现并得到处理;这类问题每天都在发生,直接影响企业的收入,而其效果也容易进行量化评估。”

Detect, Diagnose, Fix, Verify, Escalate Sam Shah outlines an ideal AI solution in the following way: “The AI solution I’d want is something that can detect, diagnose, fix, verify, and escalate, with human approval for anything risky. If I could automate one workflow first, it would be suppressed or at-risk listing recovery. It happens daily, directly impacts revenue, and success is easy to measure.”

Sellonics的CEO Adnan Aslam的观点 Adnan Aslam指出:“理想的AI系统需要了解某个品牌在特定发展阶段的能力边界以及实际存在的限制因素。基于这些信息,它应该能够为我们提供一些有实际应用价值的关键词列表(例如,这些关键词可以帮助品牌提升在搜索引擎中的排名)。”

Adnan Aslam, CEO of Sellonics notes: “An ideal AI would need to understand what’s possible for a certain brand at a certain stage and what the realistic limitations are. And based on that, it can give us, for example, a list of keywords that you can actually rank for.”

Cyril Golub的观点 Cyril Golub强调:“AI不应被视作‘魔术师’;而应该被视作一个功能强大的助手,它需要拥有明确的目标、清晰的职责范围以及可衡量的预期成果。”Cyril最近在《The Ecommerce Coffee Break》播客节目中与Claus Lauter进行了讨论,该节目吸引了全球数百万电商从业者的关注。他们探讨了AI如何重塑电商行业以及在线购物的未来。

“I don’t think AI should be treated as a magician,” Cyril Golub emphasizes. “It should be treated as a very capable assistant with a clear goal, clear boundaries and a measurable expected outcome.” Cyril recently shared this vision in a conversation with Claus Lauter on The Ecommerce Coffee Break. The podcast reaches millions of e-commerce professionals worldwide. They discussed how AI could reshape e-commerce and the future of online shopping.

电商行业的未来:由AI驱动的自动化服务许多电商公司的CEO认为,AI的发展趋势将从辅助卖家优化个别任务,逐渐转变为AI系统主动负责处理部分商业流程。对于消费者而言,AI系统将决定推荐哪些产品;因此,品牌需要确保自己的产品数据结构清晰、易于被AI系统理解。对于卖家而言,AI系统将承担更多常规性工作,但所有操作都必须遵循既定的规则和商家的权限设置。

The Future of E-Commerce is Agent-Driven Agency CEOs foresee a shift from AI helping sellers optimize individual tasks to AI agents actively running parts of the commerce business. On the shopper side, AI agents will decide which products to recommend. That makes it more important for brands to structure their product data so machines can understand them. On the seller’s side, AI agents will take over more routine work, following certain guardrails, merchant’s permissions and rules.

克劳达斯·西乌皮斯(Klaidas Siuipys)预见到这样一个未来:在那个未来中,人工智能(AI)代理将取代传统的搜索系统,帮助消费者寻找和选择产品。他说:“我认为未来的发展方向在于‘对话式购物’(conversational commerce),其中AI充当产品与消费者之间的桥梁。消费者无需自己浏览搜索结果页面,而是由AI代理来为他们挑选合适的产品。对于卖家来说,这意味着优化产品信息的策略也需要发生变化——他们不再仅仅为了在搜索结果中占据更好的位置而竞争,而是需要确保AI能够准确理解自己的产品及其目标受众。”

Klaidas Siuipys sees a future where AI agents, rather than traditional search, help shoppers find and choose products: “I believe the future lies in conversational commerce, with AI as the layer between product and buyer. Instead of the shopper scanning a results page, an agent picks what fits. For sellers, it changes what optimization means. You stop competing only for a position in search results and start making sure a machine can correctly understand what your product is and who it is for.”

与此同时,史蒂文·波普(Steven Pope)则提出了另一种愿景:他认为在未来,AI代理将能够代表卖家执行各种任务。他说:“在未来两到三年内,AI技术将帮助亚马逊卖家从手动管理产品信息及营销活动,转向使用智能系统来处理那些重复性较强的工作。真正的赢家不会是那些仅仅利用AI来编写更吸引人的产品描述或生成产品图片的卖家,而是那些能够将产品数据、品牌资产、运营流程以及决策规则整理得井井有条的卖家——这样AI代理才能安全、高效地根据这些信息来执行相应的操作。”

Meanwhile, Steven Pope shares his vision of a future where AI agents can act on sellers’ behalf: “Over the next two to three years, I think AI commerce will shift Amazon sellers from manually operating listings and campaigns to managing intelligent systems that run much of the repetitive work. The winning sellers will not simply be the ones using AI to write better bullet points or generate images, but the ones whose product data, brand assets, operational workflows, and decision rules are structured well enough for AI agents to act on them safely.”

萨姆·沙阿(Sam Shah)也表达了类似的观点:他认为未来的购物体验将从基于搜索结果的展示方式,转变为基于AI的个性化推荐系统;产品目录的质量将成为新的“搜索引擎优化”(SEO)标准。人类将逐渐从日常的运营工作中解放出来,转而专注于制定战略、做出判断以及发挥创造力。

Sam Shah sees the shift this way: “Discovery will move from search results to AI recommendations, making catalog quality the new SEO. Operations will become increasingly agent-driven, while humans focus on strategy, judgment and creativity.” The Next E-Commerce Era The winners of the AI commerce era won’t be the tools that simply generate product descriptions or recommend what to improve in your catalog. They will be the infrastructure that gives AI agents what they need to understand the business, make the right decisions, and safely take action.

Jinnify的创始人西里尔·戈卢布(Cyril Golub)指出:“二十年前,开设一家在线商店意味着需要租用服务器并安装电子商务平台;直到现在,这只需要注册一个Shopify账户即可完成。而未来的步骤将会更加简单——只需对AI代理说‘好的,克劳德(Claude),帮我开始在线销售吧’。”这篇文章并非由TNW新闻编辑部撰写,也不代表TNW的官方立场。

“Twenty years ago, starting an online store meant renting a server and installing an e-commerce platform,” says Cyril Golub, Founder of Jinnify. “Until now, it meant opening a Shopify account. The next step will be as simple as saying, ‘OK, Claude, start selling online for me.’” Contributed article. Not produced by the TNW newsroom and does not reflect the editorial stance of TNW.