字号 ·· | 护眼
国会山报

最高法院再次阻止密苏里州使用共和党青睐的选区地图Supreme Court blocks use of GOP-favored map in Missouri — again

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

美国最高法院周五阻止了密苏里州共和党人使用其偏好的国会选区划分的指令,明确向官员表明,在该州混乱的选区重划之争后,他们必须在11月的大选中回归旧版选区图。这一决定对共和党构成打击,该党曾力争在11月中期选举前使用更有利的7比1众议院选区图,而非较旧的6比2选区图。共和党去年通过了其7比1的国会选区线,并在8月的初选中使用了该图,但最高法院的裁决意味着“展示给我看之州”(密苏里州昵称)将在大选中使用另一套选区图。法院在其无署名的意见书中写道:“简而言之,根据州法律,2022年的选区图——而非2025年的选区图——必须用于2026年的国会选举。”判决书中未记录任何异议。这是三周内该选区之争第三次上诉至最高法院。在每一轮中,共和党均告败诉。密苏里州因多起针对共和党新7比1众议院选区图的诉讼而陷入动荡。该选区图是在特朗普总统和全国共和党人的压力下制定的,当时共和党正寻求在秋季选举前为众议院增加更多可争取的席位。共和党曾试图拆解众议员埃马纽埃尔·克利弗(民主党,密苏里州)以堪萨斯城为基础的选区。但随着该州恢复使用旧选区线,克利弗似乎有望赢得连任。本月早些时候,密苏里州最高法院裁定,关于国会选区线的公投将提交给选民表决,这意味着新的7比1众议院选区图在通过之前不会生效。然而,到那时,密苏里州已经使用该选区图选出了初胜者。多名共和党国会候选人开始说服联邦法官,认为如此晚地回归旧选区图是违宪的。此前,该最高法院曾撤销了这位法官的命令,似乎表明共和党将无法在11月前完成选区重划。

The Supreme Court on Friday blocked a directive for Missouri Republicans to use their favored congressional map, making clear to officials they must return to an old design for November after the state’s messy redistricting battle. The decision is a blow for the GOP, which fought to use a more favorable 7-1 House map in time for the November midterms instead of the older 6-2 map. Republicans had passed their 7-1 congressional lines last year and used it during their August primaries, but the high court’s decision means the Show Me State will now be using a different set of maps for the general election. “In short, as a matter of state law, the 2022 map—not the2025 map—must be used in the 2026 congressional election,” the court wrote in its unsigned opinion. There were no noted dissents. It’s the third time the battle reached the Supreme Court in as many weeks. In each round, the GOP has lost. The Show Me State has been roiled by several different lawsuits regarding Republicans’ new 7-1 House map, which was created amid pressure from President Trump and national Republicans as the GOP has sought to add pickup opportunities to the lower chamber ahead of the fall. Republicans sought to dismantle Rep. Emanuel Cleaver’s (D-Mo.) Kansas City-based district. But Cleaver appears poised to win reelection with the state reverting back to using its old lines. The legal battle plunged into chaos earlier this month when Missouri’s top court ruled that a referendum over the congressional lines will now go before voters, meaning that the new 7-1 House map does not go into effect until it’s passed. By that point, Missouri had already used the design to select primary winners. Several GOP congressional candidates began convincing a federal judge that reverting so late to the old map would be unconstitutional. This Supreme Court previously lifted the judge’s order, appearing to signal that Republicans wouldn’t be able to redistrict in time for November. But that didn’t stop the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. On Monday, it issued a new ruling effectively reinstating the state’s 7-1 map. It was set to take effect next week. That’s what led to the latest round at the Supreme Court. The referendum organizer fighting the GOP brought the new ruling back to the justices, seeking an emergency intervention. “This case is back before this Court for a familiar reason: a lower court has once again granted relief this Court foreclosed,” the organizer’s attorneys wrote in court filings. He emphasized that election officials had already started mailing out military and overseas ballots on Saturday using the 6-2 House map. The Supreme Court’s decision allows election officials to proceed as usual, with no need to make last-minute changes to their ballots before the general. However, the late litigation is frustrating for candidates and voters. Election officials and contenders are racing to educate voters about who’s on their ballot and which congressional district they’re in with just weeks out from the election. Politically, the Supreme Court’s decision has little impact on the national redistricting math as Republicans had only sought to add one pickup opportunity to their column in Missouri.

但这并未阻止美国第八巡回上诉法院。周一,该法院发布了一项新裁决,实际上恢复了该州7比1的选区划分图。该裁决原定于下周生效。这正是导致最高法院最新一轮介入的原因。与共和党抗争的公投组织者将这项新裁决重新提交给大法官,寻求紧急干预。该组织者的律师在法庭文件中写道:“此案再次回到本法院,原因似曾相识:下级法院再次批准了本法院已排除的救济。”他强调,选举官员已于周六开始使用6比2的众议院选区划分图寄送军人和海外选票。最高法院的裁决允许选举官员照常进行,无需在中期选举前对选票做最后一刻的修改。然而,这场迟来的诉讼令候选人和选民感到沮丧。距离选举仅剩数周,选举官员和竞选者正争分夺秒地让选民了解他们的选票上有谁,以及他们属于哪个国会选区。在政治上,最高法院的裁决对全国选区重划格局几乎没有影响,因为共和党原本只寻求在密苏里州为自己增加一个翻盘机会。

The Supreme Court on Friday blocked a directive for Missouri Republicans to use their favored congressional map, making clear to officials they must return to an old design for November after the state’s messy redistricting battle. The decision is a blow for the GOP, which fought to use a more favorable 7-1 House map in time for the November midterms instead of the older 6-2 map. Republicans had passed their 7-1 congressional lines last year and used it during their August primaries, but the high court’s decision means the Show Me State will now be using a different set of maps for the general election. “In short, as a matter of state law, the 2022 map—not the2025 map—must be used in the 2026 congressional election,” the court wrote in its unsigned opinion. There were no noted dissents. It’s the third time the battle reached the Supreme Court in as many weeks. In each round, the GOP has lost. The Show Me State has been roiled by several different lawsuits regarding Republicans’ new 7-1 House map, which was created amid pressure from President Trump and national Republicans as the GOP has sought to add pickup opportunities to the lower chamber ahead of the fall. Republicans sought to dismantle Rep. Emanuel Cleaver’s (D-Mo.) Kansas City-based district. But Cleaver appears poised to win reelection with the state reverting back to using its old lines. The legal battle plunged into chaos earlier this month when Missouri’s top court ruled that a referendum over the congressional lines will now go before voters, meaning that the new 7-1 House map does not go into effect until it’s passed. By that point, Missouri had already used the design to select primary winners. Several GOP congressional candidates began convincing a federal judge that reverting so late to the old map would be unconstitutional. This Supreme Court previously lifted the judge’s order, appearing to signal that Republicans wouldn’t be able to redistrict in time for November. But that didn’t stop the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. On Monday, it issued a new ruling effectively reinstating the state’s 7-1 map. It was set to take effect next week. That’s what led to the latest round at the Supreme Court. The referendum organizer fighting the GOP brought the new ruling back to the justices, seeking an emergency intervention. “This case is back before this Court for a familiar reason: a lower court has once again granted relief this Court foreclosed,” the organizer’s attorneys wrote in court filings. He emphasized that election officials had already started mailing out military and overseas ballots on Saturday using the 6-2 House map. The Supreme Court’s decision allows election officials to proceed as usual, with no need to make last-minute changes to their ballots before the general. However, the late litigation is frustrating for candidates and voters. Election officials and contenders are racing to educate voters about who’s on their ballot and which congressional district they’re in with just weeks out from the election. Politically, the Supreme Court’s decision has little impact on the national redistricting math as Republicans had only sought to add one pickup opportunity to their column in Missouri.