周一，一组起诉 OpenAI 侵犯版权的新闻机构辩称，法院应对司法部（DOJ）的观点给予“极小权重”，该部门本月初曾表示支持这家人工智能公司。
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and
《纽约时报》、《芝加哥论坛报》及该案中的其他媒体机构暗示，政府“可能受到了外部因素的影响——甚至包括政府自身的政治和经济利益”。
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and
他们指出了特朗普政府与人工智能公司之间的关系，包括政治捐款。
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and
这些媒体补充道：“尽管有人可能会说政治因素总会在一定程度上影响政府的诉讼立场，但人工智能行业为影响本届政府所做努力的性质、程度和透明度不应被轻易忽视。”
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and
《纽约时报》于 2023 年首次起诉 OpenAI，指控该公司未经许可利用报社的版权内容训练人工智能模型，此后多家媒体也加入了诉讼。
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and
OpenAI 则辩称其行为属于“合理使用”原则，该原则允许在未经许可的情况下使用部分受版权保护的内容。
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and
特朗普政府在 9 月初提交的一份文件中支持了该公司，称新闻机构对“合理使用”的解读“将阻碍这种创造性和科学进步，同时妨碍美国的繁荣和经济流动性”。
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and
这些媒体周一强调，政府在就案件发表利益声明之前，通常会咨询相关政府机构。
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and
但 Axios 本月初报道称，美国专利商标局及其他相关部门并未参与其中。
A group of news outlets suing OpenAI for copyright infringement argued Monday that the court should give “little weight” to the views of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which signaled support for the AI firm earlier this month. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and other outlets in the case suggested the administration “may have been influenced by extraneous considerations—up to and including the Administration’s political and financial interests.” They pointed to the relationship between the Trump administration and AI companies, including donations. “Although one could argue that political factors will always influence Government litigation positions to some extent, the nature, extent, and transparency of the AI industry’s efforts to influence this Administration should not be lightly dismissed,” the outlets added. The Times initially sued OpenAI in 2023, accusing the company of improperly training AI models on the newspaper’s copyrighted content. It has since been joined by several other outlets. OpenAI argues its actions fall under the “fair use” doctrine, which allows for the use of some copyrighted content without permission. The Trump administration backed the company in a filing in early September, suggesting the news outlets’ interpretation of fair use “would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.” The outlets underscored Monday that the government usually consults with the relevant government agencies before offering a statement of interest in a case. But Axios reported earlier this month that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and