字号 ·· | 护眼
微软全国广播公司

我是酷儿,也是免疫功能低下者——我简直不敢相信人们对这家女同性恋酒吧宽松口罩政策的愤怒I’m queer and immunocompromised — and can’t believe the anger at this lesbian bar’s relaxed mask policy

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

位于马萨诸塞州西部的女同性恋酒吧“最后防线”(Last Ditch)因提议将周六的防疫口罩政策从“强制”改为“自愿”,竟意外成为全球媒体舆论风暴的中心。该酒吧在Instagram上发布的这一决定引发了许多顾客和自称残障人士权益活动家的强烈抵制,其中一人评论道:“我希望你们的店被纵火烧掉,因为你们为了从残障歧视者那里多赚点钱,就剥夺了我们免疫功能低下群体的周六计划。”

Last Ditch, a lesbian bar in Western Massachusetts, wrongly became the center of a global media firestorm when it proposed changing its Covid masking policy from required to optional on Saturdays. The Instagram announcement of its decision ignited an intense backlash from many patrons and self-reported disability activists, one of whom commented, “I hope your venue gets firebombed for robbing my fellow immunocompromised people of their Saturday plans just to scrape extra revenue from ablists [sic].”

9月22日,《波士顿环球报》一篇关于此事的报道迅速走红,引发了全球媒体的关注,甚至吸引了来自好莱坞的咨询,探讨将其改编为纪录片或剧本的可能性。到了周六,来自全国各地的记者守候在这座宁静小镇格林菲尔德的酒吧外。(自然,这场闹剧成了互联网上的绝佳素材,催生了大量病毒式传播的梗图和推文。)上述Instagram评论并非唯一过激的言论。据《波士顿环球报》报道,有人写道,像酒吧经营者这样的人“以休闲和便利为名,残害残障人士”。另有人称:“直接承认你们在参与一场大规模致残事件算了。”作为一名同样居住在马萨诸塞州的免疫功能低下的酷儿,我深知我们在残障正义以及保护免疫功能低下和其他残障群体方面仍有很长的路要走。但与此同时,我认为这种针对“最后防线”酒吧公告的激烈反对完全不成比例,且往往带有某种特权心态,这实际上反而损害了残障运动。

A Sept. 22 Boston Globe article about the furor quickly went viral and spawned headlines around the world and even led to Hollywood inquiries for possible documentary and scripted adaptations. By Saturday, journalists from all across the country were waiting outside the bar in the sleepy town of Greenfield. (Naturally, this debacle was delicious fodder for the internet and gave birth to a plethora of viral memes tweets I hope your venue gets firebombed for robbing my fellow immunocompromised people of their Saturday plans just to scrape extra revenue from ablists [sic].” The Instagram comment above wasn’t the only one that was over the top. As reported by the Globe, one person wrote that people like those who manage the bar “kill disabled people in the name of your own leisure and convenience.” Another argued, “Just say you’re being complicit in a mass disabling event and get it over with.” As an immunocompromised queer person — who happens to live in Massachusetts — I know we have a long way to go when it comes to disability justice and our collective commitment to protecting immunocompromised and other disabled communities. But at the same time, I find such fierce opposition to the Last Ditch’s announcement to be completely outsized and often entitled, and I believe it actually undermines the disability movement.

我们对于将戴口罩作为应对新冠疫情的措施所持有的集体态度,还需要更多的思考、反思与认识。然而,从这种态度直接指责 Last Ditch 公司可能“制造了一场导致许多人丧失行动能力的事件”,实在是一种过激的举动。

Our collective relationship to masking as a mitigation effort against Covid needs more thoughtfulness, reflection and awareness. But it’s a big leap from there to accusing Last Ditch of potentially creating “a mass disabling event.” ‘Who raised him?’: Joe slams DeSantis for ‘rude’ criticism of teenagers over masks March 3, 2022 Yes, creating accessible spaces is important. But there are other constraints and lived experiences to consider, including the near-extinction of lesbian bars as a thing and the reality that immunocompromised people have the option to either mask or not attend on the one night a week the policy change applies. Crucially, Last Ditch’s operators proposed the policy because the owner is $50,000 in debt and has spent stints living in their truck to keep the bar going: They need to expand their offering and attract more clientele in order to stay afloat.

“Last Ditch 是谁创立的?”——2022 年 3 月 3 日,Joe 批评 DeSantis 因其对青少年佩戴口罩问题的粗鲁言论。

Our collective relationship to masking as a mitigation effort against Covid needs more thoughtfulness, reflection and awareness. But it’s a big leap from there to accusing Last Ditch of potentially creating “a mass disabling event.” ‘Who raised him?’: Joe slams DeSantis for ‘rude’ criticism of teenagers over masks March 3, 2022 Yes, creating accessible spaces is important. But there are other constraints and lived experiences to consider, including the near-extinction of lesbian bars as a thing and the reality that immunocompromised people have the option to either mask or not attend on the one night a week the policy change applies. Crucially, Last Ditch’s operators proposed the policy because the owner is $50,000 in debt and has spent stints living in their truck to keep the bar going: They need to expand their offering and attract more clientele in order to stay afloat.

确实,创造更加包容、易于进入的社会空间非常重要;但我们也必须考虑到其他限制因素以及人们的实际生活状况。例如,女同性恋酒吧这类场所几乎已经消失殆尽;而对于免疫系统较弱的人来说,他们可以选择是否佩戴口罩,尤其是在这项政策实施的那一周里。

Our collective relationship to masking as a mitigation effort against Covid needs more thoughtfulness, reflection and awareness. But it’s a big leap from there to accusing Last Ditch of potentially creating “a mass disabling event.” ‘Who raised him?’: Joe slams DeSantis for ‘rude’ criticism of teenagers over masks March 3, 2022 Yes, creating accessible spaces is important. But there are other constraints and lived experiences to consider, including the near-extinction of lesbian bars as a thing and the reality that immunocompromised people have the option to either mask or not attend on the one night a week the policy change applies. Crucially, Last Ditch’s operators proposed the policy because the owner is $50,000 in debt and has spent stints living in their truck to keep the bar going: They need to expand their offering and attract more clientele in order to stay afloat.

Last Ditch 公司之所以提出这项政策,是因为其经营者背负着 5 万美元的债务,甚至曾不得不住在卡车上以维持酒吧的运营。他们需要扩大业务范围、吸引更多顾客,才能继续生存下去。

There were hundreds of lesbian bars in the 1980s, but a 2019 study published by the American Sociological Association found that there were only 15 lesbian bars left in the country that year I identified as a lesbian for the majority of my adult life (I now identify as a trans man and have since transitioned), and lesbian bars then were critical sites of queer safety, exploration and becoming for me and many of my peers. These are institutions and arenas that deserve protecting. So, yes, we should work to make spaces as accessible as possible. But taking such a hard-line approach to so-called disability activism — when it affects whether a business can stay open — can actually eliminate the existence of safe spaces for queer people and other minoritized communities and ultimately undermine the sense of community and belonging that opponents to the proposed policy say they are defending.

20 世纪 80 年代,美国有数百家女同性恋酒吧;但根据美国社会学协会 2019 年发布的一项研究,到那时全国仅剩下 15 家女同性恋酒吧。我成年后的大部分时间都认同自己是一名女同性恋者(如今我已转变为跨性别男性)。对于我以及许多同龄人来说,那些女同性恋酒吧曾是重要的安全场所、探索自我身份的场所。这些场所理应得到保护。

There were hundreds of lesbian bars in the 1980s, but a 2019 study published by the American Sociological Association found that there were only 15 lesbian bars left in the country that year I identified as a lesbian for the majority of my adult life (I now identify as a trans man and have since transitioned), and lesbian bars then were critical sites of queer safety, exploration and becoming for me and many of my peers. These are institutions and arenas that deserve protecting. So, yes, we should work to make spaces as accessible as possible. But taking such a hard-line approach to so-called disability activism — when it affects whether a business can stay open — can actually eliminate the existence of safe spaces for queer people and other minoritized communities and ultimately undermine the sense of community and belonging that opponents to the proposed policy say they are defending.

因此,我们确实应该努力创造更加包容的社会环境。然而,如果对所谓的“残疾权益运动”采取过于强硬的态度(尤其是当这种态度影响到企业的生存时),反而可能会剥夺 LGBTQ+ 群体及其他少数群体的安全空间,最终破坏那些反对这项政策的人所声称想要维护的社区归属感。

A 2019 study published by the American Sociological Association found that there were only 15 lesbian bars left in the country that year.

此外,一些批评者参与这场辩论的方式,恰恰是左翼阵营自我粉碎、自我绑架,而非致力于社区建设的典型例证。道德纯洁性政治和道德试金石测试一贯会导致灾难性的后果,因为它们扼杀了产生建设性张力和合作的机会。在此过程中,它通过社会制裁腐蚀了团结。

Furthermore, the way some detractors have engaged in this debate is a perfect example of the left pulverizing itself, holding itself hostage rather than meaningfully working toward community building. The politics of moral purity and moral litmus tests have consistently led to disastrous outcomes, as they foreclose opportunities for generative tension and collaboration. In the process, it corrodes solidarity through social sanctions.

这种激烈抵制最令人失望的一点在于,它以牺牲所有其他边缘化群体的经历为代价,来优先考虑某一种边缘化经历。关于社区和归属感的真正、有意义的工作需要对话与妥协,而不是尖酸刻薄和暴力威胁。正如有人所言,希望这家酒吧被纵火焚烧,这等于是在说,如果女同性恋酒吧不能在营业的每一小时都强制佩戴口罩,那他们宁可不要这家酒吧。作为一个免疫功能低下的酷儿,我曾一次又一次在这样的地方找到归属感,我对此强烈反对。

One of the most disappointing things about the fierce backlash is that it prioritizes one marginalized experience at the expense of all others. Real, meaningful work on community and belonging requires dialogue and compromise, not vitriol and threats of violence. To wish firebombing on the bar, as one person did, is to say that they’d rather not have a lesbian bar unless it required masks during its every open hour. As an immunocompromised queer person who has, time and again, found a home and belonging in such places, I strongly disagree. The post I’m queer and immunocompromised — and can’t believe the anger at this lesbian bar’s relaxed mask policy MS NOW