加利福尼亚州于周二通过了一项法律,禁止地方、州和联邦执法人员使用能够对人体产生痛苦电击的手套。这项针对电击手套的禁令将于明年生效,并将持续到2030年。此前几周,美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)刚采取行动为其官员配备这种手套,该手套旨在让好斗人员服从管理。上个月,该机构授予了一份价值近1700万美元的合同,用于采购6000副此类手套。
California has passed a law Tuesday banning local, state and federal law enforcement officers from using gloves that can deliver painful electric shocks to people The ban on shock gloves will take effect next year and remain in place until 2030. It comes weeks after US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) moved to equip its officers with the gloves, which are designed to gain compliance from combative individuals. Last month, the agency awarded a nearly $17m contract to buy 6,000 pairs.
加州州长加文·纽森在签署该法律后发表声明称:“特朗普将他的政治利益置于美国家庭的健康、安全和生计之上。加州正在采取行动,加强我们州移民执法工作的透明度、问责制和监督。”自特朗普去年上任以来,民主党主导的各州一直在奋起抗击其移民执法努力,该法律便是最新的例证。今年,加州议员通过了至少两打法案,旨在巩固移民权利、限制与联邦移民特工的合作以及收紧对移民拘留设施的监管等。
“Trump has put his political interests above the health, safety and livelihood of American families,” said Gavin Newsom, California’s governor, said in a statement afterg the law. “California is taking action to strengthen transparency, accountability, and oversight around immigration enforcement in our state.”The law is the latest example of how Democratic-led states have been pushing back against Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement efforts since he took office last year. In California, lawmakers passed at least two dozen bills this year seeking to fortify immigrants’ rights, restrict cooperation with federal immigration agents and tighten regulations on immigrant detention facilities, among other things.
根据美联社使用法案追踪软件Plural进行的分析,在全美范围内,由民主党主导立法的17个州今年总共通过了100多项支持移民的法案。最常见的目标是限制与联邦移民执法特工的合作。
Nationwide, 17 states with Democratic-led legislatures have passed a total of more than 100 pro-immigrant bills this year, according to an Associated Press analysis using the bill tracking software Plural. The most common purpose is to limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement agents.
加州民主党籍众议员拉谢·夏普-柯林斯(LaShae Sharp-Collins)表示,她提出电击手套立法的目的是在全州审查这些设备的潜在风险期间,“暂停”执法部门对其的使用。该法律要求州司法部研究其安全性,并在2029年之前向议员们提交报告。
LaShae Sharp-Collins, a Democratic California assembly member, said she introduced the shock-gloves legislation to “put a pause” on law enforcement’s use of the devices while the state examines their potential risks. The law requires the state’s justice department to study their safety and report to lawmakers by 2029.
“目前局势非常动荡,充满不确定性,”她在一次采访中表示,“很多人都非常害怕。”这项法律将再次考验该州在特朗普政府推行移民政策期间限制联邦官员权力的能力。今年早些时候,一位联邦法官驳回了该州制定的首项全国性法律——该法律禁止联邦官员佩戴面罩,认为这项规定具有选择性(因为它既适用于地方执法部门也适用于联邦执法部门,但却豁免了州政府官员的佩戴要求)。
“There’s a lot of unrest and a lot of uncertainty,” she said in an interview. “A lot of people are scared.”The law will again test the state’s authority to restrict federal agents amid the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown. A federal judge earlier this year blocked the state’s first-in-the-nation law barring federal officers from wearing face coverings, deeming it too selective because it applied to local and federal law enforcement but exempted state officers.
今年,州立法机构通过了一项新法案,将这一禁令扩展到所有政府官员。纽森州长签署了这项立法。
Lawmakers passed a new bill this year to make the ban apply to all officers. Newsom signed that legislation.
加州大学戴维斯分校法学院的名誉教授凯文·约翰逊表示,法院最终很可能会裁定该州无权禁止联邦官员佩戴防电击手套或面罩。他认为这些法律出发点是好的,但很可能与美国宪法中的“联邦至上”原则相冲突;根据这一原则,联邦法律通常应优先于与州法律相抵触的法规。
Kevin Johnson, a professor emeritus at the University of California, Davis School of Law, said courts are likely to ultimately rule that the state cannot bar federal officers from wearing shock gloves or face coverings. The laws are well-intentioned, he said, but likely conflict with the supremacy clause of the US constitution, which generally sets federal law as supreme over conflicting state law.
“该州几乎没有任何权力去规定联邦政府及其官员应该如何配备武器,”他说。
“The state has very limited, if any, powers in dictating to the federal government how its officers are armed,” he said.
萨克拉门托县警长吉姆·库珀(民主党人,曾任州议员)表示,禁止联邦官员佩戴防电击手套“实在毫无道理”——因为这些手套属于执法人员可以在必要时使用的非致命性装备。
Sacramento sheriff Jim Cooper, a Democrat and former state lawmaker, said banning shock gloves “really makes no sense” because they are among the non-lethal tools officers can use if necessary.
“每当联邦政府采取某种行动时,州立法机构就想出台禁令来限制它,”他在新闻发布会上说道,“这只会让我们的工作变得更加困难。”夏普-柯林斯指出,美国移民与海关执法局(ICE)使用防电击手套的计划是推动这项禁令出台的直接原因;但她同时也提到了其他执法人员也使用过这类装备的案例——例如2024年肯塔基州有一家人指控一名男子在执法部门关押期间被多次使用防电击手套电击,最终死亡。
“When the federal government does something, the state legislature wants to ban it,” he said at a news conference. “They’re making our job harder.”Sharp-Collins said ICE’s plan to use shock gloves was the catalyst for the ban. But she cited their use by other officers, including a case in which a Kentucky family alleged a man died after being tased and shocked with the gloves dozens of times while in law enforcement custody in 2024.
斯科特·维纳是加州参议员,也是去年推动实施面罩禁令的立法者;他今年又推动了这项将禁令扩展到州政府官员的法案的制定。
Scott Wiener, a state senator and San Francisco Democrat who wrote last year’s mask ban, also authored this year’s measure to expand it to state officers.
“加州必须动用一切可用的手段,来捍卫我们饱受移民和海关执法局(ICE)秘密警察恐怖行动攻击的社区,”他在该法案通过立法机构后发表的一份声明中表示。
“California must use every available tool to stand up for our communities under attack from ICE’s secret police terror campaign,” he said in a statement after it passed the legislature.