如果您看到了周日在NFL比赛期间播出的电视广告，您可能会觉得它似曾相识。
If you saw the television ad that aired Sunday during an NFL game, it may have looked familiar.
这则广告是唐纳德·特朗普总统2024年竞选视频的翻版，内容旨在宣扬针对“共产主义者”和“战争贩子”的“终极之战”。
The ad was a carbon copy of a 2024 campaign video from President Donald Trump touting the “final battle” against “communists” and “warmongers.”
但有一个重要的区别。这一次，该广告并非由特朗普竞选团队或政治行动委员会支付费用。在广告的最后，一段免责声明标明了其赞助方：“由美国政府支付”。
But there was one important difference. This time, the ad was not paid for by the Trump campaign or a political action committee. At the very end, a disclaimer identified its sponsor: “Paid for by the U.S. Government.”
“不可辩解”：阿里抨击特朗普使用纳税人资金投放广告 2026年9月28日 这则广告只是特朗普政府过去一周推出的一系列由纳税人资助的商业广告中的最新一例，政府称这些广告是“公共服务公告”。但即便是国会共和党人也表示担忧，认为这些广告可能违反了管理公共服务公告的相关法律。
‘Indefensible’: Ari slams Trump’s taxpayer-funded ad September 28, 2026 The ad is just the latest in a series of taxpayer-funded commercials that the Trump administration has rolled out over the past week, saying they are “public service announcements.”But even congressional Republicans are expressing concern that the ads may violate the laws governing PSAs.
“这是一个很好的信息。我喜欢这个信息，”参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党人约翰·图恩周一告诉记者。“但它不应该用纳税人的钱来支付。”
“It’s a great message. I like the message,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters on Monday. “But it shouldn’t be paid for with taxpayer dollars.”
即将退休的北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯言辞更为直接：“我讨厌它。”
Retiring Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., was even blunter: “I hate it.”
“这感觉就像维克多·欧尔班在对匈牙利人民讲话，”蒂利斯说。“你想投放那个广告？我们有充足的资源。这些广告花不了多少钱。”蒂利斯表示，这则商业广告“让我无法理解”，他提到了广告的内容以及支付方式。
“It feels like Viktor Orbán talking to the Hungarian people,” Tillis said. “You want to run that ad? We got plenty of resources. The ads didn’t cost that much.”Tillis said the commercial “didn’t make sense to me,” citing the content of the ad and how it was paid for.
“如果它是一个明确的、能够吸引更广泛受众的信息——一个真正的公共服务公告，那没问题。但事实并非如此，”蒂利斯说。“这就像我们刚与共产主义世界的领导人会面，转头却在宣扬对抗共产主义。”他补充说，这一切对他来说都“毫无意义”，但最让他无法理解的是用纳税人的钱来支付广告费用。
“If it were, you know, some clear message that was going to appeal to the broader — a real public service announcement, that’s fine. But that was not that,” Tillis said. “It’s like we’re fighting communism just after we met with the leader of the communist world.”He added that “none of it made sense” to him, but what made the least sense to him was paying for the ad with taxpayer dollars.
就连通常是特朗普捍卫者的南达科他州共和党参议员迈克·朗兹也对这些广告提出了异议。“这不是我会做的事情，”他告诉MS NOW。
Even Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., typically a Trump defender, took issue with the ads. “It’s not something that I would’ve done,” he told MS NOW.
截至周三，特朗普已经解说了三则由联邦政府支付费用的电视广告，这些广告已在各大媒体市场播出。
As of Wednesday, Trump has narrated three television s — paid for by the federal government — that have aired in major media markets.
在周日播出的最新一则广告中，特朗普说道：“我们将彻底把美国从这些恶棍手中解放出来。”他所指的“恶棍”包括“深层政府”、“战争贩子”、“全球主义者”、“共产主义者”、“马克思主义者”、“法西斯主义者”、“病态的政治阶层”以及“假新闻媒体”。“腐败”：特朗普挪用纳税人的钱投放个人广告的行为极其恶劣，连“让美国再次伟大”（MAGA）的支持者都对此提出了批评。
In the most recent one, which ran on Sunday, Trump said, “We will liberate America from these villains once and for all,” referring to the “deep state”, “warmongers,” “globalists,” “communists,” “marxists,” “fascists,” the “sick political class” and “the fake news media.” ‘Corrupt’: Trump’s use of taxpayer money for personal ads is so bad even MAGA is calling it out In another one, Trump said that “this is only the beginning of the golden age of America.”
在另一则广告中，特朗普称“这仅仅是美国黄金时代的开始”。第三则广告中，特朗普表示“美国永远不会成为一个共产主义国家”，终极格斗冠军赛（UFC）首席执行官达纳·怀特则称特朗普是“我见过最坚强、最有韧性的人，没有什么能阻止他为他所热爱的国家而奋战”。背景音乐播放着歌曲《爱我》（Love Me）。
The third spot featured Trump saying that “America will never be a communist country,” and UFC CEO Dana White saying that Trump is “the toughest, most resilient person I’ve ever met and nothing is gonna stop him from fighting so hard for the country he loves.”The song “Love Me” is playing in the background.
这三则广告的结尾都带有相同的免责声明：“由美国政府付费”。白宫为这些广告进行了辩护，坚称它们是公益广告，并表示其他政府也曾发布过类似的内容。
All three ads end with the same disclaimer: “Paid for by the U.S. Government.”The White House has defended the s, insisting they’re public service announcements while saying that other administrations have published similar material.
白宫通讯联络主任史蒂文·张在社交媒体上写道：“别让假新闻媒体用关于我们正在电视上播放的史诗级公益广告的谎言蒙蔽了你们。”但没有任何一届政府像特朗普的白宫这样明目张胆。总统实际上直接照搬了一则竞选广告，而其他商业广告也采用了类似的主题和意象。
“Don’t let the Fake News get away with their lies about our epic Public Service Announcements that have been running on tv,” White House communications director Steven Cheung wrote on But no administration has been nearly as brazen as Trump’s White House. The president has literally recycled one campaign ad, while the other commercials feature similar themes and imagery.
更令公共信息与政治宣传之间的界限变得模糊的是，这些广告恰好在期中选举前几周播出，意图十分明显。
Further complicating the line between public information and political messaging, the ads conspicuously come just weeks before the midterm elections.
当然，一些共和党人声称对这些广告并不知情，坚称自己没有看过——尽管其中最新的一则广告曾在《福克斯周日新闻》、《周六夜现场》以及多场橄榄球比赛期间播出。
Of course, some Republicans pleaded ignorance about the ads, insisting they hadn’t seen them — including the most recent one that aired during “Fox News Sunday,” “Saturday Night Live” and a number of football games.
北达科他州共和党参议员约翰·霍文和犹他州共和党参议员约翰·柯蒂斯都表示他们错过了这些广告。“我不知道这是政治广告，因为我没看过，”柯蒂斯说道。
Sens. John Hoeven, R-N.D., and John Curtis, R-Utah, both said they had missed the commercials. “I don’t know it’s a political ad because I haven’t seen it,” Curtis said.
但没看过这则广告并不妨碍其他人拒绝置评。得克萨斯州共和党参议员约翰·科宁（John Cornyn）透露，他也没看过这些广告，但他表示，仅凭阅读相关报道就足以让他得出结论。“我们都知道，你不应该把纳税人的钱用于那种目的，”科宁说。
But not seeing the ad didn’t stop everyone from declining to comment. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, disclosed that he also hadn’t seen the commercials, but he said reading about them was enough for him to draw a conclusion. “We all know you’re not supposed to use taxpayer money for that purpose,” Cornyn said.
西弗吉尼亚州共和党参议员雪莉·摩尔·卡皮托（Shelley Moore Capito）也表示，她不会投放此类广告，但由于她实际上没看过这些广告，“我能说的也就这些了”。她说：“从围绕这件事的所有喧嚣来看，我认为这些钱花在其他地方可能会更好。”
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W. Va., also said she wouldn’t run ads like that, but because she hadn’t actually seen them, “that’s about all I can say.”“From all the hubbub about it, I think probably money’s better spent doing other things,” she said.
不过，也有一些共和党人站出来为总统辩护。佛罗里达州共和党参议员里克·斯科特（Rick Scott）向记者坚称，特朗普“不是第一个这么做的总统”，尽管特朗普确实是第一位将竞选广告重新包装，并动用纳税人的钱将其作为公益广告投放的总统。民主党人方面，他们不仅表达了担忧，还采取了行动。
There were, however, some Republicans defending the president. Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., insisted to reporters that Trump is “not the first president who’s done this,” even though Trump is certainly the first president to recycle a campaign ad and use taxpayer dollars to run it as a public service announcement. Democrats, for their part, went beyond expressing concern; they were taking action.
华盛顿州参议员帕蒂·默里（Patty Murray，参议院拨款委员会民主党领袖）和康涅狄格州民主党参议员克里斯·墨菲（Chris Murphy）致信国土安全部部长马克韦恩·马林（Markwayne Mullin），要求对这些广告及其资金来源做出说明。他们称动用政府资金播放“政治广告”既是“非法的，也是对纳税人资金令人震惊的腐败滥用”。
Sen. Patty Murray of Washington — the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee — and Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin demanding an accounting for the ads and how they are being funded, calling the use of government dollars to air “political ads” both “illegal and a shockingly corrupt misuse of taxpayer dollars.”
他们写道：“很难想象还有比这更令人愤慨的对比：特朗普总统在非法削减救命的健康研究经费的同时，还在非法利用美国纳税人的钱来资助政府宣传，并将他2024年的竞选广告重新搬上荧幕。”
“It’s hard to imagine a more damning split screen: while President Trump illegally cuts funding for lifesaving health research, he is also illegally using Americans’ tax dollars to fund government propaganda and to put ads from his 2024 campaign back on the air,” they wrote.
康涅狄格州民主党参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔（Richard Blumenthal）在接受MS NOW采访时表示，这些广告简直是“令人憎恶的”。
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., separately told MS NOW that the ads are an “abomination.”
“这些恶毒的、党派色彩浓厚的广告建立在谎言之上，绝对是一种耻辱，绝不应该用纳税人的钱来支付，”布卢门撒尔说道，并补充称“总统再次非法动用了他的权力。他必须为此承担责任。”墨菲（Murphy）则对这一可能造成的危险先例发出了警告。
“These vicious, partisan ads, based on falsity, and absolutely a disgrace, should never have been paid by the taxpayer money,” Blumenthal said, adding that the “president’s using his power, once again, illegally. He needs to be held accountable.”And Murphy offered a warning about the potentially dangerous precedent.
“如果这就是新规则，”他说，“那么未来的每一位总统都将利用纳税人的钱来开展他们的政治竞选活动。”当新罕布什尔州民主党参议员玛吉·哈桑（Maggie Hassan）周二试图通过一项一致同意的决议，声明纳税人不应为特朗普的宣传广告买单时，怀俄明州共和党参议员辛西娅·卢米斯（Cynthia Lummis）迅速表示反对。
“If this is the new rule,” he said, “then every future president is just going to run their political campaigns using taxpayer money.”When Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., tried to pass a resolution by unanimous consent on Tuesday stating that taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay for Trump’s promotional ads, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., swiftly objected.
“这些公益广告核心传达的信息很简单：美国价值观值得捍卫，以抵御共产主义和社会主义的失败意识形态，”卢米斯在参议院发言时说。“如果这就是让新罕布什尔州参议员感到担忧的原因，我会建议，这种担忧更多地反映了她所在党派的问题，而不是广告本身的问题。”
“The message at the heart of these PSAs is a simple one: American values are worth defending against the failed ideologies of communism and socialism,” Lummis said on the Senate floor. “If that is what has the senator from New Hampshire concerned, I’d suggest the concern says more about her side of the aisle than it does about the PSA.”The post‘I hate it’: Republicans call out Trump for his taxpayer-funded campaign ads MS NOW