人工智能（AI）已被视为全球权力斗争的核心要素。在美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的领导下，白宫召集了AI领域的顶尖人士，重新引发了关于“技术封建主义”（即技术巨头对全球政治和经济秩序的支配）的讨论。土耳其AI政策协会（AIPA）的负责人向《安纳托卢》杂志表示：“世界上最有权势的科技巨头们都参加了这次会议，这反映了新世界秩序正在形成的过程——埃隆·马斯克、黄仁勋（Jensen Huang）、马克·扎克伯格（Mark Zuckerberg）、桑达尔·皮查伊（Sundar Pichai）、萨蒂亚·纳德拉（Satya Nadella）和杰夫·贝索斯（Jeff Bezos）等人都与政府高级官员坐在一起。”
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been positioned as a central element of the global power struggle, with the White House under US President Donald Trump gathering AI leaders and reigniting debates over techno-feudalism, the head of the Turkish AI policy association AIPA told Anadolu. Zafer Kucuksabanoglu stated that the world’s most powerful tech figures took part in the meeting, which he said showed a snapshot of how the new world order is taking shape, with figures like Elon Musk, Jensen Huang, Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella and Jeff Bezos seated alongside senior government officials. He noted that these tech billionaires were also prominently placed during Trump’s January 2025 inauguration, which served as a harbinger of this new era.
扎费尔·库库克萨巴诺格鲁（Zafer Kucuksabanoglu）指出，这些科技巨头在2025年1月特朗普的就职典礼上也占据了显要位置，这预示了一个新时代的到来。他解释说：“这种权力集中正是‘技术封建主义’争论的核心所在：特朗普将AI重新定义为‘超级智能’（superintelligence），这不仅仅是一个术语上的变化，更是一种政治和战略上的主张，旨在宣称美国在该领域拥有全球领导地位。他认为AI竞争实质上是中美之间的竞争，并强调AI的发展速度不能放缓。”
“This concentration of power is precisely at the heart of the ongoing techno-feudalism debate — for instance, Trump’s push to redefine AI as ‘superintelligence’ is not just a terminological shift but a claim to global leadership in this advanced technology as a political and strategic narrative,” he said. “Trump asserted that the AI competition is essentially between the US and China, while stressing that development must not slow down.”
库库克萨巴诺格鲁还提到，虽然一些行业领袖出于安全考虑呼吁减缓AI的发展速度，但华盛顿方面认为这样做反而会有利于中国。
Kucuksabanoglu stated that industry leaders recently called for slowing the pace of AI development for safety reasons, but Washington is arguing that slowing down will only benefit China.
他强调：“美国的策略可以概括为：既要控制这项技术，又要保持其发展速度；既要增强安全性，又不能落后于创新的步伐。我认为未来的AI争论将主要围绕这些平衡点展开。”他同时呼吁土耳其必须积极参与这一全球变革进程，敦促当地决策者重视AI的发展，并评估这些全球趋势对土耳其可能产生的影响。
“The US approach can be summarized as controlling the technology but not slowing down and enhancing security but not losing the pace of innovation — I think the central AI debate will be shaped by these balances in the coming period,” he said. He emphasized that Türkiye must be a part of this global transformation, urging local decision-makers to prioritize AI and assess what these global developments could mean for the country.
“对潜力的评估不仅要在科技圈内进行，还要在一个汇聚公共和私营部门、大学和公民社会的平台上展开，”他说。“决策者和开发者必须更频繁地坐下来相互倾听，因为这是一个在几个月内就会出现重大变化的领域，所以一年一度的会议已经不够了。”库丘克萨巴诺格鲁表示，AIPA启动了月度对话会议，以弥合土耳其公共部门政策视角与私营部门实践经验之间的差距。
“The assessment of potentials must take place not only within tech circles but on a platform gathering the public and private sectors, universities and civil society,” he said. “Decision-makers and developers must sit down much more frequently and listen to one another as this is a field where significant changes come to the fore within a matter of months, so annual meetings are no longer sufficient.”Kucuksabanoglu stated that AIPA launched monthly dialogue meetings to bridge the gap between the Turkish public sector’s policy perspective and the private sector’s hands-on experience.
“就人工智能的每一个领域而言，土耳其要在同等规模上与美国和中国竞争并不现实，因此土耳其应该确定几个战略领域，并把资源分配到那里——我们通过国防部门建立了强大的工业基础和制造文化，而金融、医疗、物流、旅游和公共服务等其他领域则是人工智能可以创造显著附加值的领域，”他说。“我还要把农业加入这些领域，因为人工智能可以在从提高效率和水资源利用到早期疾病检测和作物规划等一系列活动中提供帮助。”
“It’s not realistic for Türkiye to compete with the US and China on the same scale when it comes to every area of AI, so Türkiye should identify a few strategic areas and allocate resources there — we’ve built a strong industrial base and a culture of production through our defense sector, while other sectors like finance, healthcare, logistics, tourism and public services are areas where AI could generate significant added value,” he said. “I would add agriculture to these areas as AI can help in a range of activities, from improving efficiency and water use to early disease detection and crop planning.”
“我们看到美国采取的是与创新和竞争相关的路径，而欧洲有自己的更偏监管的路径，中国则有一套完全不同的模式，但土耳其不必照搬其中任何一种——我们必须建立自己的平衡，一种既能确保安全又不会扼杀创新、并能加速人工智能转型的平衡。土耳其也许不会在每个领域都成为人工智能领导者，但它必须确定自己在这个新世界秩序中将处于什么位置，因为我们今天所讨论的关乎经济、生产、农业、企业、劳动力和全球力量平衡的未来，”他补充说。
“We see the US innovation- and competition-related approach, while Europe has its own more regulatory approach, and China has a whole other model, but Türkiye does not have to copy any of these approaches — we must establish our own balance, one that ensures security without stifling innovation and accelerates AI transformation. Türkiye may not become an AI leader in every field, but it must determine where it will stand in this new world order, as what we’re discussing today deals with the future of the economy, production, agriculture, companies, the workforce and global power balances,” he added.