10月1日:美联储理事丽莎·库克周四表示,她认为人工智能及其带来的通胀压力是2027年的首要风险,并指出日益频繁的供应冲击产生了出人意料的持久影响,对政策制定变得更加重要。
Oct 1 : Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook said on Thursday that she sees AI, and its inflationary push, as a top risk for 2027, and noted that increasingly frequent supply shocks have had surprisingly persistent effects and become more salient for policy.
库克在纽约联邦储备银行的一次活动中对纽约联储主席约翰·威廉姆斯表示:“人工智能的建设可能会产生通胀压力,这种压力可能不会很快消失。因此,我认为这是目前2027年最令我担忧的主要事情之一。”上个月,库克在美联储一致投票通过将政策利率上调25个基点,以支持通胀“更及时”地回到美联储2%的目标。美联储的目标通胀指标在8月份为3.4%,且高于目标已超过5年半。
"The AI build out is potentially creating inflationary pressures that may not resolve very quickly," Cook told New York Fed President John Williams at an event at the regional Fed bank. "So I think this is one of the main things that concerns me right now for 2027." Cook joined a unanimous vote last month at the Fed to raise the policy rate by a quarter of a point to support a "timelier" return of inflation to the Fed's 2 per cent goal. Inflation by the Fed's targeted measure was 3.4 per cent in August and has been above the goal for more than 5-1/2 years.
库克表达了美联储许多人所持有的观点,即她相信从长远来看,人工智能将提高生产力。但是,她说:“我担心产生通货紧缩的生产力收益何时会到来,以及接下来的供应瓶颈会在哪里。”包括中东冲突在内的地缘政治因素也可能阻碍供应链。
Cook, voicing a view shared by many at the Fed, said she believes that in the longer term AI will boost productivity. But, she said, "I worry about when the productivity gains that would produce disinflation will come, and where the supply bottlenecks are going to be next." Geopolitical considerations, including the conflict in the Middle East, could also crimp supply chains.
库克说:“我们过去的传统观点是,我们会忽视供应冲击,因为更紧缩的货币政策不会对油价产生影响,不会对战争产生影响,但它可能会放缓我们更关心的就业和产出结果。”
"Our conventional view used to be that we would look through the supply shocks because tighter monetary policy is not going to have an effect on oil prices, not going to have an effect on a war, but it could slow down employment and output outcomes that we would be more concerned about," Cook said.
然而,她表示,现在“最佳应对方式”可能会有所不同,这取决于受供应冲击影响的行业等因素。
Now, however, it is possible that the "optimal response" could be different, depending for instance on the sectors affected by the supply shocks, she said.