蕾妮·古德（Renee Good）的幸存者们本周提起的诉讼指出，移民和海关执法局（ICE）探员乔纳森·罗斯（Jonathan Ross）于1月7日在明尼阿波利斯枪杀了这位37岁的三个孩子的母亲，且罗斯并无杀害她的理由。但原告方提出的另外两项具体指控，让我这位拥有40年执法经验、曾培训其他警员的资深人士深感不安。
The lawsuits filed this week by the survivors of Renee Good, who was shot dead Jan. 7 by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jonathan Ross in Minneapolis, make the general claim that Ross had no reason for killing the 37-year-old mother of three But plaintiffs make two more specific allegations that particularly trouble me as a 40-year law enforcement veteran who trained other officers.
诉讼文件称，至少有一名ICE探员告诉坐在SUV驾驶座上的古德，她可以离开ICE探员正在执行任务的现场，而与此同时，其他探员却命令她下车。诉讼还指控，现场的探员不仅未能在古德中枪后为她提供援助，还阻止了一名医生试图施救。这些目前仅是指控。
The lawsuits say at least one ICE agent told Good, who was in the driver’s seat of an SUV, that she could leave the scene where ICE agents were working at about the same time other agents were ordering her out of her car. The lawsuits also allege that agents at the scene not only failed to provide aid to Good after she was shot but also stopped a doctor from trying to help her. These are but allegations.
政府方面声称，罗斯是出于自卫开枪，因为他担心古德即将驾车撞向他，法院最终可能会裁定其行为是否正当。但关于古德收到相互矛盾的指令、以及中枪后被拒绝医疗救助的指控，描述的是我曾目睹过的失误，我深知这些行为在专业警务中绝不应存在。
The government has claimed Ross fired in self-defense because he feared she was about to run over him with her vehicle, and a court may eventually decide whether he was justified. But the allegations that Good was given conflicting orders and denied medical aid after she’d been shot describe failures I’ve seen before and know have no place in professional policing.
关于古德收到相互矛盾的指令、以及中枪后被拒绝医疗救助的指控，描述的是我曾目睹过的失误，我深知这些行为在专业警务中绝不应存在。
The allegations that Good was given conflicting orders and denied medical aid after she’d been shot describe failures I’ve seen before and know have no place in professional policing.
作为一名曾领导警察队伍的人，当警员行为正确时，我会为他们辩护。我深知车辆与枪支一样，同样能致警员于死地，探员理应对此保持警惕。但正因如此，规范的训练要求警员避开车辆行驶路径，而不是向车辆开枪。美国国土安全部自身的政策也禁止仅为了阻止某人驾车逃离而使用致命武力。现场拍摄的视频显示，罗斯本可以不必挡在古德的车前，但他却那样做了。
As someone who has led police officers, I have defended them when they are right. I know a vehicle can kill an officer as surely as a gun can, and agents are right to respect that. But that’s why sound training tells officers to step out of a vehicle’s path rather than fire into it. The Department of Homeland Security’s own policy bars deadly force used simply to stop someone from driving away. Video taken at the scene suggests Ross got in front of Good’s car when he didn’t have to.
根据古德及其同伴提起的诉讼，事发时“ICE特工们从车上下来，其中一人厉声命令道：‘下车！从那该死的车里出来！’据我们所知，另一名ICE特工还指示蕾妮离开现场。”设身处地想想古德的处境：一名警员命令他走，另一名则让他下车，还有第三名警员手按在他的车门上。无论他怎么做，都算违背某人的命令；无论他怎么做，事后都可能被认定为反抗行为。
According to the Good survivors’ lawsuit, in the incident in question, “ICE agents got out of their vehicle, with one instructing: ‘Out of the car. Get out of the f—ing car.’ On information and belief, another ICE agent gave Renee an instruction to leave the scene.”Put yourself in Good’s seat. One officer says go. Another says get out. A third has a hand on your door. Whatever you do, you are disobeying someone. And whatever you do can later be called resistance.
训练有素的教官会传授一条原则：当多名警员接近目标对象时，仅由一人下达命令，其他人则负责警戒。这并非出于礼貌，而是战术需要。接到相互矛盾指令的人根本无法遵从，下达指令的警员也无法预料后续会发生什么。混乱引发恐惧，恐惧则导致枪击。
Good trainers teach one rule for this: . When several officers approach a subject, one gives commands and the others cover. That is not courtesy. It is tactical. A person given conflicting orders cannot comply, and officers who give them cannot predict what happens next. Confusion breeds fear. Fear breeds gunfire.
“ICE的枪击事件何时才会停止？”：米卡严厉批评移民执法手段“造成心理创伤” 2026年9月23日 明尼苏达州也曾出现过类似下达矛盾指令的指控。2016年，圣安东尼市的一名警员截停了驾车者菲兰多·卡斯蒂尔。当警员询问他是否携带武器时，卡斯蒂尔如实回答“是的”（他持有持枪许可）。几秒钟后，该警员朝卡斯蒂尔的车内连开七枪，并喊道：“我叫他别伸手去拿武器！”
‘When will the ICE shootings stop?’: Mika slams ‘traumatizing’ immigration tactics September 23, 2026 Minnesota is familiar with allegations of conflicting commands. In 2016, a St. Anthony police officer pulled over motorist Philando Castile who answered affirmatively when the officer asked him if he was armed. (Castile had a permit to carry a handgun.) Seconds later, the officer fired seven shots into Castile’s car and shouted, “I told him not to reach for it.”
坐在副驾驶座的卡斯蒂尔的女友则回应道：“警官，您当时是让他出示身份证件，也就是驾照啊。”后来该警员虽被判定无过失杀人罪，但圣安东尼市并未承认自身过错，而是向卡斯蒂尔的家属支付了近300万美元以和解，从而避免了一场联邦层面的不当致死诉讼。
Castile’s girlfriend, who was in the passenger seat, responded, “You told him to get his ID, sir, his driver’s license” The police officer was later acquitted of manslaughter, but St. Anthony, without admitting blame, settled with Castile’s family for nearly $3 million to avoid a federal wrongful death lawsuit.
当指令无法被遵从时，它们便不再是指令，而成了借口。我认为大多数警员并非故意设下这种圈套，但坐在车里的人无论如何都要付出代价。
When commands cannot be obeyed, they stop being commands. They become a pretext. I don’t believe most officers set such a trap on purpose. But the person in the car pays the same price either way.
有指控称，古德中枪后，执法人员拒绝为她提供医疗救助，还阻止其他人施以援手。这一说法实在令人难以接受，但今年1月多家媒体报道的现场目击者拍摄的视频恰好印证了这一点。视频中有人询问能否帮助古德，并告诉ICE执法人员自己是一名医生。那名执法人员回应道：“我不在乎。”
The allegation that agents denied Good medical aid after she was shot and prevented others from helping is even harder to stomach, but it is supported by bystander video that was reported by newsrooms in January. Included in that video was a person asking if he could help Good and telling the ICE agent he was a physician. The agent responded, “I don’t care.”
今年1月多家媒体报道的现场目击者拍摄的视频恰好印证了这一说法。
is supported by bystander video that was reported by newsrooms in January. I’ll be candid.
坦白说，罗斯射出的子弹有一发击中了古德的太阳穴，从头部另一侧穿出。当时那条街上恐怕没有任何医生能救得了她。但这一残酷的事实丝毫不能改变执法人员提供救助的义务。当时现场没有任何人知道她的伤势会致命。
One of Ross’ bullets entered Good’s temple and exited the other side of her head. It is unlikely any doctor on that street could have saved her. But that grim fact changes absolutely nothing about the duty to aid. No one at that scene knew the wound was fatal.
当时，美国国土安全部发言人以古德已无脉搏为由为执法人员未施以救助的行为辩护。然而执法人员既不是医生也不是法医。他们的职责就是立即展开救助，或允许他人施救，直到具备专业资质的人员接手为止。美国国土安全部自身的武力使用政策也明确规定，必须为遭受武力伤害的人员提供医疗救助。其实明尼阿波利斯市对这类问题再熟悉不过：2020年，当明尼阿波利斯警察德里克·肖万用膝盖死死压住乔治·弗洛伊德的脖子时，一名休班的明尼阿波利斯消防员恳请警察允许她检查弗洛伊德的脉搏。
At the time, a DHS spokesperson defended the agents’ lack of aid by saying Good did not have a pulse. But officers are neither physicians nor coroners. Duty requires them to begin aid, or allow it, until someone qualified takes over. DHS own use-of-force policy calls for medical assistance for people injured by force Again, this is an issue Minneapolis already knows a lot about. In 2020, as Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin kept his knee planted on George Floyd’s neck, an off-duty Minneapolis firefighter begged officers to let her check Floyd’s pulse. They refused to let her do so Her testimony helped convict Chauvin Klobuchar questions Blanche on DOJ’s cooperation in investigations into deadly ICE shootings July 15, 2026 There is a deeper point.
但警察们拒绝了她的请求。她的证词后来成为判定肖万有罪的关键证据。2026年7月15日，克洛布查尔就司法部在调查ICE致命枪击事件中的配合情况向布兰奇提问。
What officers do after force is used tells the public who they are. An officer who fires and then rushes to stop the bleeding shows that force was used to end a threat, not to punish a person.
还有一个更深层次的问题：执法人员在使用武力后的所作所为，向公众展现了他们的真实面目。开枪后立刻赶去止血的警察，表明使用武力是为了消除威胁而非惩罚他人；而拒绝对受伤者施以救助的警察则传递了完全相反的信号。
Officers who wave off a doctor send the opposite message. Nearly nine months later, no one has been charged in Good’s death. The Department of Justice declined to open a criminal investigation and Minnesota officials have accused federal agencies of withholding evidence DHS said it launched an investigation into the shooting, but no details or updates have been released, and the status of that investigation is unclear.
近九个月过去了，至今仍无人因古德的死亡而被起诉。美国司法部拒绝启动刑事调查；明尼苏达州官员则指责联邦机构隐瞒证据。美国国土安全部称已对此次枪击事件展开调查，但并未公布任何细节或最新进展，调查现状也尚不明确。对于MS NOW关于该调查的提问，国土安全部未立即作出回应。
DHS did not immediately respond to MS NOW’s questions about the probe. Good’s brother Brent Ganger summed it up: “No accountability, no investigation, no expression of condolence, no change in policy.”Civil court is the one door still open to this family.
古德的兄弟布伦特·甘格总结道：“没有问责，没有调查，没有慰问，政策也毫无改变。”
Good’s brother Brent Ganger summed it up“No accountability, no investigation, no expression of condolence, no change in policy.”
民事法庭是这个家庭目前唯一能求助的途径。布伦特·甘格再次总结道：“没有问责，没有调查，没有慰问，政策也毫无改变。”其实所需的改进措施并不复杂：应培训联邦执法人员并要求他们统一使用指定的语音下达指令；在现场安全后，他们应提供救助或让具备资质的旁观者施以援手；一旦有人违反上述规定，主管官员必须承担责任。据我所知，所有管理良好的警察部门都是这样运作的。
The fixes are not radical. Federal agents should be trained and required to use one designated voice for commands. They should render aid or let qualified bystanders do it once a scene is secure. Supervisors should answer when either rule is broken. Every well-run police department I know already works this way.
坚定与人道并非相互对立。执法者理应兼具这两种特质。蕾妮·古德理应得到明确的指令以及争取生机的机会。然而据其家人所述，这两样她一样都没得到。这并非所谓的法治与秩序，而只是单纯的暴力罢了。
Being firm and being humane are not opposites. Law enforcement officers are expected to be both. Renee Good deserved clear instructions and a fighting chance. According to her family, she got neither. That is not law and order. It is only force. The post If claims from Renee Good lawsuits are true, ICE didn’t give her a chance MS NOW