OpenAI首席执行官萨姆·奥尔特曼表示，在人工智能监管问题上，他的公司与竞争对手Anthropic之间仍存在根本性的立场差异。他在POLITICO旗下Decoded的独家采访中称，这项技术的益足以为承担某些风险提供理由，而且人工智能应继续广泛向公众开放。
The OpenAI CEO sought to distinguish his policy stance from rival developer Anthropic. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said there remains a fundamental difference in worldview between his company and rival Anthropic on artificial intelligence regulation, arguing in an exclusive interview with Decoded by POLITICO that the technology’s benefits justify accepting some risks — and that AI should remain broadly accessible to the public.
“我认为双方在很多方面仍有明显分歧。”奥尔特曼告诉Decoded的联合作者、POLITICO高级科技记者布伦丹·博德隆。当被具体问及他与Anthropic及其首席执行官达里奥·阿莫代伊存在哪些分歧时，奥尔特曼说：“我们认为，为了这项技术带来的益处，也为了让人们拥有自主权，世界应该接受一些负面后果。”长期以来，Anthropic一直被视为业内最坚定的人工智能监管支持者，而这一立场直到不久前仍与OpenAI所偏好的宽松监管路线相抵触。
“I think there’s a lot of daylight,” Altman told Decoded co-author and POLITICO senior tech reporter Brendan Bordelon. Asked specifically where he diverges from Anthropic and its CEO Dario Amodei, Altman said, “we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency.”Anthropic has long been viewed as the strongest proponent of AI regulations within the industry, a stance that until recently was at odds with the lighter-touch approach favored by OpenAI.
不过，随着OpenAI应对备受关注的黑客事件及其模型的不受控行为，并开始支持更严格的规定，这两家领先人工智能企业之间的政策分歧近几个月来已有所缩小。
But the policy differences between the two leading AI firms have narrowed in recent months, with OpenAI backing tougher rules as it grapples with high-profile hacking incidents and rogue behavior by its models.
奥尔特曼认同阿莫代伊上月提出的放缓最先进人工智能模型开发的呼吁。他的公司继Anthropic之后，也支持了各州新出台的法律；这些法律对安全提出了比ChatGPT开发商此前所支持的标准更严格的要求，标志着OpenAI此前的州级监管策略发生了微妙转变。最近，OpenAI的游说人员还支持了一项两党共同提出的众议院提案，该提案将要求顶尖人工智能公司引入外部安全评估人员。
Altman agreed with Amodei’s call last month to slow the development of the most advanced AI models. His company has followed Anthropic in endorsing new state laws that impose stricter safety requirements than what the maker of ChatGPT had previously supported — a subtle shift from its prior state strategy. And OpenAI lobbyists recently endorsed a bipartisan House proposal that would require top AI companies to embed outside safety evaluators.