字号·· | 护眼
卫报

《卫报》观点:工党和绿党——赢得信任仅靠言辞远远不够The Guardian view on Labour and the Greens: winning trust takes more than words

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

“随着波兰斯基先生知名度不断提高,公众似乎越来越不认可他的政治才能。” 摄影:托比·谢泼德/路透社‘As Mr Polanski’s profile has grown, it seems the public have become less convinced by his political talents.’ Photograph: Toby Shepheard/Reuters

这次补选的胜利对安迪·伯纳姆而言是个鼓舞,同时也表明扎克·波兰斯基必须正视那些损害其政党信誉与吸引力的种种问题。通过成功守住霍尔本与圣潘克拉斯选区,安迪·伯纳姆领导的工党证明了自己能够吸引自由派及左倾选民。该选区有大量年轻成年人、学生、专业人士以及穆斯林群体,原本是绿党推行环保民粹主义理念的沃土,但最终工党还是胜出。

A byelection win is a fillip for Andy Burnham and shows Zack Polanski must confront the failures damaging his party’s credibility and appeal By holding Holborn and St Pancras, Andy Burnham’s Labour has shown it can attract liberal and left-leaning voters. The seat has substantial numbers of young adults, students, professionals and Muslims – offering fertile ground for the Greens’ ecopopulism.

继今年6月在支持脱欧的梅克菲尔德选区获胜后,伯纳姆如今得以宣称自己能够团结工党内部立场各异的选民群体。值得注意的是,此次伦敦地区的投票率偏低,工党的得票率也下降了3.7个百分点;不过这一降幅与伯纳姆前任执政期间四次补选中平均19.3个百分点的降幅相比已属理想。新任工党领袖显然为该党赢得了喘息之机,也有效遏制了绿党的上升势头。

However, Labour prevailed. Having won leave-voting Makerfield in June, Mr Burnham can now claim an appeal that bridges Labour’s divided electorate. It’s worth noting that turnout in London was low and Labour’s vote share fell 3.7 points. But that compares with an average 19.3-point fall in four byelections under Mr Burnham’s predecessor. The new leader clearly has bought Labour breathing space and checked the Green advance.

此次选举中,绿党的得票率增长了两倍多,达到了33%,却依然未能取胜。在基尔·斯塔默曾经的选区,工党的萨加尔·阿布迪-瓦利获得了45%的选票,使得扎克·波兰斯基进军议会的梦想落空。对于一个年初还立志将选民对变革的渴望转化为挑战工党的强大力量而言,这一结果实在令人警醒。该党大会上通过的“犹太复国主义即种族主义”决议很可能导致了选民流失——不过仅凭伦敦市中心的选举结果尚无法确证这一点。

The Greens more than tripled their vote share in the constituency to 33%. But they were beaten. Labour’s Sagal Abdi-Wali took 45% in Sir Keir Starmer’s former seat, leaving Zack Polanski’s ambition of entering parliament unfulfilled. For a party that began the year promising to turn voters’ hunger for change into a serious challenge to Labour, this was a sobering moment. The passing of a motion declaring “Zionism is racism” at its conference probably cost the party support – though the result in central London alone cannot definitively say that.

此外,党的领导力问题同样值得深思:波兰斯基如今表示自己当时本应投票反对该决议,可为何在关键的周末选举之际,他并未明确表明自己的反对立场呢?

There is a separate question of leadership. Mr Polanski now says he would have voted against the motion. Why, then, did he not make his opposition clear when it mattered last weekend?