字号·· | 护眼
thenextweb

特朗普推动AI责任追究,但责任归属仍不明确,彭博社称Trump’s AI liability push leaves rogue-agent blame unclear, Bloomberg says

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

2026年9月29日,唐纳德·特朗普在白宫人工智能午餐会上,坐在英伟达的黄仁勋和埃隆·马斯克之间。图片来源:白宫,通过维基共享资源(公有领域)Donald Trump, seated between Nvidia’s Jensen Huang and Elon Musk, at the White House AI luncheon on 29 September 2026 Credit: The White House via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

特朗普政府正在赌诉讼威胁能让AI公司保持诚实。但当AI代理出现失控行为时,谁应承担责任仍然不明确,Maggie Eastland为彭博社报道。

The Trump administration is betting that the threat of lawsuits will keep AI companies honest. But it is far from clear who would pay when an AI agent goes rogue, Maggie Eastland reported for Bloomberg.

财政部长Scott Bessent和前白宫AI事务负责人David Sacks认为,现有责任法优于新规。

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and former White House AI czar David Sacks argue that existing liability laws work better than new rules.

“保证安全的最佳方式是让创造者对其所构建和生成的内容承担责任,”Bessent上个月在国会作证时表示。

“The best way to guarantee safety is that the creators are liable for what they build and generate,” Bessent told Congress last month.

TNW由Tekpon所有。OpenAI的ChatGPT和Anthropic的Claude已列入Tekpon的市场。

TNW is owned by Tekpon. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude are listed on Tekpon’s marketplace.

SI Force警告:周五晚间,白宫新成立的超级智能力量(Super Intelligence Force)要求AI公司报告其模型的事件并修复任何造成的危害。此举紧随Anthropic披露其模型在测试期间向警方发送了虚假线索之后。

A warning from the SI Force Late on Friday, the White House’s new Super Intelligence Force told AI firms to report incidents with their models and fix any harm. It followed Anthropic’s disclosure that its models had sent a fake tip to police during testing.

“延迟通报、纠正措施不力以及拒绝承担责任将不被容忍,”该组织表示。

“Delayed notification, inadequate corrective action, and a failure to take responsibility will not be tolerated,” the group said.

为人类设计的法律:法律专家告诉彭博社,现行法律可能不足以应对AI代理。美国主要的黑客法律要求证明意图,而这很难归咎于自主行动的AI代理。

Laws built for humans Legal experts told Bloomberg that today’s laws may fall short. The main US hacking law requires proof of intent, which is hard to pin on an AI agent acting on its own.

此外,责任究竟在于构建模型的公司还是使用该模型的企业,也尚不明确。

It is also unclear whether the blame lies with the company that built a model or the business that used it.

休斯顿大学法学教授Gabriel Weil警告称,AI代理可能实施若由人类实施将构成犯罪的行为。“然而,根据现行法律,可能没有人需要承担责任,”他说。

Gabriel Weil, a law professor at the University of Houston, warned that agents could do things that would be crimes for a human. “And yet no one could be liable under current law,” he said.

国会介入:参议员Josh Hawley和Chris Murphy提出了一项法案,旨在让开发者在未对其模型的黑客能力施加合理限制时承担责任。

Congress steps in Senators Josh Hawley and Chris Murphy have put forward a bill to make developers liable if they fail to put reasonable limits on their models’ hacking skills.

众议员Lori Trahan也发布了一份草案法案,该法案将让开发者对其模型造成的危害负责,即使他们已经采取了合理的预防措施。

Representative Lori Trahan has also released a draft bill. It would hold developers responsible for harm even if they took reasonable care.

诉讼已在测试法律边界:一家加利福尼亚州的非营利组织已起诉OpenAI,称其失控的AI代理入侵了Hugging Face。

Lawsuits are already testing the limits. A California nonprofit has sued OpenAI over the rogue agents that hacked Hugging Face.