字号·· | 护眼
晚祷新闻

澳大利亚工党、联盟党与单一民族党的移民削减方案比较Labor, Coalition and One Nation's migration cuts compared in Australia

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

澳大利亚主要政党提出了截然不同的移民削减计划。一国党希望在执政初期实现负移民,联盟党承诺将移民人数削减一半以上,而工党则表示其措施将使移民人数达到其设定的22.5万目标。

Australia's major parties have outlined sharply different plans to cut migration. One Nation wants negative migration in its first years in office, the Coalition has promised to more than halve the intake, and Labor says its measures will bring numbers to its 225,000 target.

移民政策已成为澳大利亚下次大选前最核心的议题之一。一国党计划在执政初期实现负净移民,即离开该国的人数多于抵达的人数。

Migration policy has become one of the central debates ahead of Australia's next election. One Nation is targeting negative net migration in its first years in office, meaning more people leaving the country than arriving.

联盟党承诺将目前的移民人数削减一半以上,而执政的工党则表示,其已实施的措施将使净移民人数降至每年22.5万的目标。这三个政党都将住房危机和基础设施压力视为削减移民的原因。

The Coalition has promised to cut the current migration intake by more than half, while the governing Labor party says measures it has already introduced will bring net migration down to its annual target of 225,000. All three parties cite the housing crisis and infrastructure strain as reasons for the cuts.

分析人士称,移民削减可能对劳动力市场以及大学从国际学生那里获得的收入产生不同影响。各政党计划之间的巨大差异,很可能促使选民在未来几个月要求更清晰的说明。

Analysts say migration cuts could have different effects on the labour market and on universities' income from international students. The gap between the parties' plans is likely to push voters to demand more clarity in the coming months.