每周，MS NOW的法律分析专家、《Main Justice》播客的联合主持人安德鲁·韦斯曼都会在MS NOW会员专属栏目《安德鲁·韦斯曼答疑》中，回答听众提出的法律问题。
Each week, MS NOW legal analyst Andrew Weissmann, co-host of our “Main Justice” podcast, answers legal questions from our audience in our MS NOW Membership exclusive series, “Answers with Andrew Weissmann.”
本周，韦斯曼回应了六位会员的提问，其中包括：“本周唐纳德·特朗普实质上是在邀请伊朗‘摧毁’洛杉矶和圣迭戈，还称这不过是‘很小的代价’。这怎么不符合叛国罪的典型定义呢？总统为何能说出这种话却无需承担任何后果？这又反映出我国当下的何种现状？”韦斯曼还和报道了此次集会的MS NOW国会记者迈克·施内尔，共同探讨了特朗普在集会上的言论。
This week, Weissmann addresses six questions from Members, including: “Donald Trump this week essentially invited Iran to ‘take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego, and that it would be a ‘small price to pay.’ How is this not the textbook definition of treason? How is the president allowed to say these things without consequence? What does that say about our country right now?”Weissmann discussed Trump’s rally comments with MS NOW congressional reporter Mychael Schnell, who covered the event. Other questions from this week’s discussion:
本周讨论的其他问题还包括：目前是否有针对现任政府官员违反《哈奇法》的投诉被提交至总法律顾问办公室？若有，这些投诉又是如何处理的？这部法律本身是否具有实际约束力？
Are complaints about violations of the Hatch Act on the part of members of the current administration being received by the Office of General Counsel, and, if so, how are those complaints being handled? Has the act itself any teeth at all?
任命纽约州总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯为特别检察官来调查康奈尔大学涉嫌集体强奸案，会对案件审理产生什么影响？
What does appointing Letitia James, New York’s state attorney general, as special prosecutor to investigate the alleged gang-rape at Cornell University, add or change to the case?
特朗普以存在选民欺诈为由推行诸多破坏选举公平性的举措，可为何从未被要求提供相关证据？要知道这类证据根本就不存在啊。
Why hasn’t Trump been required to produce evidence when he is making all these changes and moves against free and fair elections on the grounds of voter fraud, even though we know that evidence doesn’t exist?
最高法院大法官塞缪尔·阿利托表示自己计划任职至明年，否定了外界关于他可能提前退休、好让唐纳德·特朗普在明年新一届国会就职前填补其空缺的猜测。不过，如果民主党在中期选举后重新掌控参议院，难道不会阻碍特朗普的任命计划吗？
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said he plans to stay on the court through next year, brushing aside speculation that he could retire early and let President Donald Trump fill his seat after the election but before a new Congress is sworn in next year. But if Democrats could regain the Senate after midterms, doesn’t that block any appointee Trump picks?
明尼苏达州的法官们既然对移民及海关执法局无视法庭命令的行为如此不满，为何没有判定该机构藐视法庭呢？立即成为MS NOW会员吧
If the Minnesota judges were so upset about ICE thwarting their orders, why did they not hold ICE in contempt of court? Become an MS NOW Member to