
OpenAI和Anthropic承诺,如果英国情报部门向他们展示其AI系统不安全,他们将立即下架这些平台——一些人将此描述为启动“杀伤开关”。
OpenAI and Anthropic have promised to take down their AIs if the British secret services show them they are unsafe - activating what some describe as a "kill switch".
两家公司的代表告诉议员们,他们将对来自MI5、MI6、GCHQ以及AI安全研究所(AISI)的危害证据作出即时回应。
“如果AISI或MI5、MI6、GCHQ或这些当局中的任何一家来找我们说,‘我们认为您的模型不安全,我们认为它正被恶意行为者使用’,我们显然会以最高紧急程度立即审查这一点,”OpenAI EMEA政策负责人汤姆·达夫·戈登说。
Representatives from the two firms told MPs that they would respond immediately to evidence of harm from MI5, MI6 or GCHQ, as well as the AI Security Institute (AISI)."If either AISI or MI5, MI6, GCHQ or any of these authorities came to us and said, 'We think your model is unsafe, we think it's being used by a bad actor,' we would obviously look at that immediately with the utmost urgency," said Tom Duff Gordon, Head of EMEA Policy at OpenAI."
“如果我们对该模型拥有控制权,我们就会停止该模型的部署,或者暂停其训练,或者根本不进行部署。”代表Anthropic的布斯勋爵作出了同样的承诺。
If we are in control of the model, we would then stop the deployment of that model, or we would pause the training model, or we wouldn't deploy it." Lord Booth Smith, representing Anthropic, made the same commitment."
“如果任何机构拿出确凿证据表明该模型不安全或危险,我们当然会将其下架,”他在商务、创新、科学和贸易委员会面前对议员们说。
If any agency came forward with demonstrable evidence that the model was not safe or dangerous, we would of course take it off the market," he told MPs at the Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee.
然而,两人都警告称,他们只有在拥有模型控制权时才能这样做,而这并不总是可能的。
However, both men cautioned that they could only do this if they had control of the model, something that isn't always possible."
“由于模型有时由他人托管,我们并不总是能够控制其部署方式,因此在模型的一般部署方面存在一些细微差别,”达夫·戈登先生说。
There are some nuances with regard to how models in general are deployed because we don't always have control if they're hosted by somebody else," said Mr Duff Gordon.
更多来自天空新闻:谋杀调查启动,针对致命房屋火灾失败的911通话被公布。
今天早上,MI5局长警告称AI正在“超级充电”英国的安全威胁。
More from Sky News:Murder investigation launched into fatal house fireFailed execution 911 calls releasedThis morning the head of MI5 warned that AI is "supercharging" security threats to the UK.
肯·麦卡勒姆爵士表示:“它可以制造针对个人的宣传和激进化材料。
Sir Ken McCallum said: "It can produce propaganda and radicalising material tailored to the individual.
我们已经发现恐怖分子试图利用AI来改进他们的侦察和攻击方法,而配备AI的无人机增添了新的变数。”
We've caught terrorists seeking to exploit AI to improve their reconnaissance and attack methodologies, with AI-enabled drones adding a new twist."
尚未实现——但我认为最应关注的误用案例——是AI可能改变现有甚至新型生物武器的风险格局。
Not yet realised - but the misuse case to which I'd attach greatest weight - is AI's potential to change the stakes on existing or even new bioweapons."